Couric & Co.
October 9, 2007 2:16 PM

When Is A Leak Not A Leak?

Peter Maer is a White House correspondent for CBS News.

(CBS)

The White House has come up with a new euphemism for leaks.

Press Secretary Dana Perino said intelligence agencies would be responsible for investigating what she described as any "process problem " in the alleged disclosure of sensitive information from a tip the administration received in advance of Osama bin Laden's video message last month.

Perino was reacting to the Washington Post's front page disclosure that a small private intelligence-gathering group's ability to monitor al Qaeda websites was severely compromised by administration leaks. The newspaper reported that just hours after the group SITE, the acronym for Search for International Terrorist Entities, privately shared advance details of the bin Laden message with the White House and intelligence agencies, word of the video spread to news organizations. The published report quoted SITE as saying the leak caused al Qaeda supporters to block access to the web links the intel-gathering outfit had used in past successful efforts to get the jump on the terror group's communications. The Post quoted SITE founder Rita Katz as saying, "Techniques that took years to develop are now ineffective and worthless."

Spokeswoman Perino was quick to insist that the White House was not the source of the leak. The Bush administration, like its predecessors, abhors leaks except for self-serving disclosures. Now the White House is in the uncomfortable position of worrying that release of the SITE data will have a chilling effect on other commercial outfits or individuals who want to provide private tips to federal law enforcement or intelligence agencies.

Presidential Homeland Security Advisor Frances Townsend told reporters, "any time an individual or a commercial entity cooperates with us and asks to be protected and doesn't get the protection that they either sought or deserved, that's a cause for concern."Spokeswoman Perino said the administration wants people to be "alert and aware" and to provide information to the government. She promised their sources will be protected.

Perino described the leak of the bin Laden video material as "an isolated incident."
Tags:
Katie Couric ,
Osama Bin Laden
Topics:
Field Notes
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by memekiller October 10, 2007 4:26 PM EDT
Or...
"WH: You Didn''t Hear This from Me."
"WH Source Denies Own Existence".
"Leaker Investigate Leak"
"Source of Tape Vows to Find Self"
Reply to this comment
by memekiller October 10, 2007 3:43 PM EDT
Perhaps a better title of this post would be, "Whitehouse Sources deny Whitehouse source of this leak"
Reply to this comment
by ericmichael1 October 10, 2007 3:16 PM EDT
Intelligence such as this is almost impossible to keep a wrap on when it comes out.

Even in the intel realm, it will get electronically forwarded to scores of law enforcement and intel personnel in an instant. And you really want that trickle-down info to happen quickly with information that needs to be passed on. But each time it is forwarded it slips a little more out of the grasp of those who created it.

My feeling is that, if SITE had wanted it not to be passed on, they should have waited until it was posted before passing it on to the White House. Was there any new information gleaned from its quick disclosure? SITE should have protected its own sources if it worried them enough.

Who knows, maybe it was put out there by AQ in an effort to figure out SITE''s secrets. And they may have just taken the bait too quickly. It was undoubtedly Rita Katz and other SITE staff who wished to "scoop" the other contractors in an effort to look better, and it backfired.

A misfortune of war, not something to convene congressional hearings about. Congress would be better tasked to look to itself and actually pass a federal budget before the fiscal year passes.

Eric
Reply to this comment
by memekiller October 10, 2007 2:33 PM EDT
Okay, this is a prime example of what''s wrong with journalism. Obviously you were given this video like every other media outlet. So, who gave it to you?

You just sat there and gave us their spin, but you didn''t tell us who made the call. You don''t need to give up your source, but you can tell us if it came from the White House.

I remember when we found out Tim Russert was one of those called by the White House about Plame, which meant the whole time people used his show to spread the meme that this didn''t come from the White House, he knew otherwise, and did NOTHING to prevent his show from being used to misinform the public. Now you''re doing the same.

Who gave you the video?
Reply to this comment
by r_lamprey October 9, 2007 7:58 PM EDT
Disgusting...spelled with a capital "W". Another example of the Bush Administration putting politics ahead of the Intelligence services, and the safety of Americans. Dana Perino can''t plead incompetence any more. Numerous selective "leaks" for political fear mongering has made it clear that the Bush administration places politics above all. The media should identify the administration "leakers".
Reply to this comment

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR