Public Eye
September 28, 2007 11:35 AM

Limbaugh's Loose Lips

(AP)
As discussed in this space last week, there’s a lot of inappropriate things said and done that are trumped up into Major Media Controversies. Left-leaning groups and right-leaning groups – the screaming monkeys on both sides – are always trying to publicize things and raise their profile on the nation’s agenda. So you weigh their claims see if the event meets the threshold for attention.

Bill O’Reilly’s insipid observation about African-American restaurants earlier this week seemed like a media diversion that – given all the other events this week – didn’t tip the scales into an actual problem.

But some things are outrages despite being spotlighted by ideological groups.

Take what was said by Rush Limbaugh this week, as reported on Talking Points Memo – inspired by the liberal group Media Matters -- yesterday:
In a conversation on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, a listener named Mike said that antiwar people never talk to "real soldiers," adding that they take their cues from soldiers who are against the war and "talk to the media."

To which Limbaugh rejoined: "The phony soldiers.”
According to the account, Limbaugh also later added:
"What is the imperative in pulling out? What's in it for the United States to pull out? I don't think they have an answer for that, other than, `It's gonna bring our troops home. Save the troops. Keep the troops safe. Or whatever. It's not possible intellectually to follow these people."
Maybe it’s because my father was a Marine. Maybe it’s because my brother has been deployed to both Afghanistan and Iraq in the past few years. But suggesting that a soldier who has qualms with the military’s operations in Iraq and chooses to vocalize those reservations is phony ... well, it tips this reader's scale.

It’s too early to know how much is going to be made of this story, but it’ll be interesting to see how the coverage of Rush belittling some soldiers compares to MoveOn.org’s ad criticizing General Petraeus. (Labelled a "misstep" here.) He might not generate the media buzz he once did, but Rush still ranks as the number one most influential talk show host… and is heard on the Armed Forces Radio Network.

Regardless of how zealously (or not) they support our military engagement in Iraq, each and every soldier deserves our respect – a sentiment echoed in polls commissioned surrounding the Petraeus testimony. Are their wounds or scars “phony” if they take issue with our foreign policy?

Coincidentally or not, I see a small left-generated online campaign has begun to urge the Armed Forces Radio Network to remove Limbaugh from its airwaves. And the network’s website today indicates that “there was a hard drive failure yesterday” at the site.

Stay tuned.

Update: (12:27pm) In writing this post, I reached out to a few sources. Al Jazeera's Josh Rushing -- the former Marine press liason who now serves as a correspondent for the English-language Al Jazeera network.

His thoughts? "It's ... exactly the kind of rhetoric that is devestating to the hope of having a fruitful dialog about Iraq.

"It assumes that all service members think the same way, undermining the idea that our military represents a cross section of our society with a wide representation of the views on the subject."
Tags:
Rush Limbaugh ,
Talking Points Memo
Topics:
In The News
Add a Comment See all 48 Comments
by mattcat25 October 1, 2007 2:48 PM EDT
Rush Limbaugh is against our Soldiers serving in Iraq and isn''t a "real american".
Reply to this comment
by actornaught October 1, 2007 2:30 PM EDT
therealextex and Rush are both lying scumbags.

If rush was only referring to one person, why did it take him 2 minutes, and a couple transitions, between saying "phony soldiers" and "Jesse MacBeth", and then why did he edit out almost the entire "context" on his website and his later diatribe about it, lying every bit about it??

http://mediamatters.org/it
ems/200709280009?f=h_latest
Reply to this comment
by therealextex October 1, 2007 1:54 PM EDT
All of you who actually listened live to Rush''s show- the whole show- on the ''phony soldiers'' day, please raise your hand.

As I thought- only ME! Rush was talking about Jesse Metcalf and Scott Beauchamp BY NAME!
Now all of you stupid libs who insist on saying that "Rush called soldiers who disagree with the war phony soldiers" PROVE IT! None of this ''it''s clear from the text stuff''- just show the quote that identifies phony soldiers with anti-war soldiers. You can''t- because he said nothing of the kind.

And ABC, CBS, and NBC should be ASHAMED for taking the word of MediaMatters that he did!
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 October 1, 2007 12:36 PM EDT
"This absurd and scurillous campaign is going boomerang on the Democrats and their partners in the media.?

The logic of this statement is elusive, what does Right Wing Wacko Rush Limbaugh%u2019s attack against all Military Personnel serving in Iraq that may have a differing opinion on the mission, agenda, and mismanagement of the Bush Administration have to do with the Democrat-ic Party?

Rush Hudson Limbaugh is attempting to threaten, shame, and segregate those troops that may from a first hand experience be against the Republican War Scheme, or they oppose the manner in which the Bush Administration have implemented it.

In typical Limbaugh style, %u201Cthe back lash from the back lash will be a severe%u2026.back lash?%u201D
My fiends%u2026

Reply to this comment
by geno8808 October 1, 2007 1:10 AM EDT
This absurd and scurillous campaign is going boomerang on the Democrats and their partners in the media.

MSNBC devoted an entire evening to this completely contrived story. How embarrassing is that?
Reply to this comment
by actornaught September 30, 2007 2:56 PM EDT
Rush is a lying scumbag. His claim to only referring to one person is total BS, and to "defend" himself, he''s used a heavily editted version of the "context".

http://mediamatters.org/items/200709280009?f=h_latest
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 September 30, 2007 6:24 AM EDT
It is People like Rush that are prolonging this illegal war and who never had the balls to sign up themselves. It''s time to remove this Un-American Loud mouth from the air waves. Or better yet, put a gun in his hand and send Him to Iraq and see what his comments are then. Frickin'' JackA**.
Reply to this comment
by stevencee September 29, 2007 6:15 PM EDT
Obviously, Limbaugh is blind to his abject hypocrisy,(as if his "all drug users need prison time, uh, except for me" exposure wasn''t blatant enough), for if ANYONE is the "phony" in this dialogue, it is HIS smarmy, "I''ll talk tough, but hell if I, or anyone as smart/wealthy as me, will put my *** on the line" and enlist, or at the least, URGE his listeners/dittoheads to do so, cause "Uncle Sam Wants (& needs) You"!

His un-American, hateful divisiveness, & abuse of free speech, along with his tough-talking cowardice & true disrespect for our brave soldiers (ALL of them, not just those who swallow his malarky, is truly repugnant.

For any commentator, caught in as many lies as he, to have even a shred of credibility, speaks volumes to the unfortunate dumbing down of so many Americans.
Reply to this comment
by smoyerjx September 29, 2007 4:27 PM EDT
It''s quite the comedy to watch the misinformed so foolishly froth and foam-at-the-mouth. Doh!




Reply to this comment
by memekiller September 29, 2007 3:38 PM EDT
What''s your point? That Rush would never impugn the reputation of a veteran''s service based on politics? The only reason you''re trying to claim this example is a fraud is because the media is running with it, but there are many other examples. For instance, in Rush''s defense, he called an active service man and Vietnam veteran "phonies" by name because they disagreed with him politically. That''s beyond question. He coined the term "Betrayus" for Senator Hagel, another Vietnam vet. he also said, "I want to respectfully disagree with the president on the last part of what he said. I am going to challenge the patriotism of people who disagree with him because the people that disagree with him want to lose." Immediately preceding the "phony soldiers" (plural) comment, he berated a veteran, Republican and Rush listener as being a "phony Republican" for disagreeing with him on one issue: the war. He said Hacket, an Iraq Vet, was a "staff puke" who only joined the military to "pad his resume" -- he served, you see, but as a Democrat, his service was -- how do you say it? -- phony? Yes, that''s the word.
Reply to this comment
by jessemacbeth September 29, 2007 3:44 AM EDT
Sergeant Bauchamp?!? If you''re going to promote that lying scumbag four paygrades just for sliming his fellow soldiers, you could at least start referring to me as Major Macbeth. It has a nice ring to it.
Reply to this comment
by memekiller September 29, 2007 1:46 AM EDT
"And by the way, Jesse MacBeth''s not the only one. How about this guy Scott Thomas who was writing fraudulent [still serving in Iraq], phony things in The New Republic about atrocities he saw that never happened? How about Jack Murtha [Vietnam Veteran] blanketly accepting the notion that Marines at Haditha engaged in wanton murder of innocent children and civilians?"

http://mediamatters.org/items/200709280011?f=h_latest
Reply to this comment
by algibbs3 September 29, 2007 12:07 AM EDT
It is pretty obvious that the author of this hit piece is a Democrat/liberal snmpatico. I can''t believe he is quoting a source from Al Jazeera !!! He lost all credibility with that quote.
Reply to this comment
by September 28, 2007 9:49 PM EDT
When Rush finally hits a high note and it offends certain people, people scream out.

But when RUSH does his thing EVERYDAY OF THE 5 DAY WEEK - belittling with amusement - tearing down good so he can think he''s GOD - calling people any word he chooses ---no one seems to scream back.

His FREEDOM OF SPEECH is not a given - his ABUSE OF SPEECH is abundant proof that he has been strung out too long for the wrong purposes and it has got to be a brain wave that he succumbs to every day on the airwaves.

NOT ONE MEMBER OF THE MEDIA has ever said anything negator about his activities regarding calling Democrats - "commie libs". That phrase is a calm top of the head lingo he reverberates with a chuckle.

Have listened to Rush for the last few years - some things he is right on and throws it out to be examined, while most of the time he is clawing his way up any wall that reads - squash em. He is literaly bonkers - true ballistic when he hears or thinks the word Democrats - Liberals --- yet over 12 million people apparently enjoy his antics every week.

william j clemons
willclem@grics.net
Reply to this comment
by uncleraisin September 28, 2007 9:30 PM EDT
This stuff of media saying this-and-that about other media types, kind of irks me.

Go to www.UncleRaisin.com to see what exposing injustice is really about - the local issues. This national stuff is all a bunch of out-of-reach-to-the-average-Joe stuff and doesn''t hit us where we live, for the most part.

Uncle Raisin
www.UncleRaisin.com
"Raisin" the standard against injustice
Reply to this comment
by memekiller September 28, 2007 9:10 PM EDT
And while I''m pounding nails, the audio Rush used to exhonerate himself HAD BEEN EDITED!!!!

http://mediamatters.org/items/200709280009?f=h_latest
Reply to this comment
by memekiller September 28, 2007 8:47 PM EDT
Okay, the final nail in the lid of this whole MacBeth sideshow. If there was ever any doubt that Rush, after a long history of smearing the service of veterans with whome he does not agree, had suddenly stopped and been wrongly accused with his "phony" comments, Limbaugh now lists some "phony" soldiers by name: Jack Murtha and Scott Bauchamp. Murtha has unquestionably served this country in the armed forces, yet he is a "phony" for not agreeing with him politically. The Sergeant Bauchamp is the one subjected to a smear campaign after writting about his experiences for a pro-war magazine.

Game. Set. Match.

Listen:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Download/21845/1/Rush-non-apology-phonies.mp3
Reply to this comment
by rlwhitedov September 28, 2007 8:25 PM EDT
Any military man/woman that goes into harms way I would never call a phony soldier. However, when my husband was in service (30 years) a soldier never talked to the media and never spoke out against his President or country policy. It just does not sit right with me that they are doing it now. They do not have to agree with that policy, but this is an all-voluntary force and when you join up you can pretty well know at some point you will be in a war situation.

When you get home and you are out of the service then if you wish to complain you have all the rights for which you fought to keeping them safe in this country.

Now mind you that is just my opinion.

Dr. Roberta Lee PhD
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 September 28, 2007 8:14 PM EDT
Limbaugh states that the US should stay in Iraq until the job is done. But, he fails to answer the question of what determines what that might be. Bush and the Republicans keep changing our motivation to keep our fighting force occupying the country of Iraq. After five years with no improvement in sight for bush%u2019s puppet regime to seize control of the Iraqi oil production, Limbaugh stresses to the Dittos that the goal is to sustain this conflict as long as possible, until the Democrat Party can manage to end it, then we blame them for the foible that was completely managed by the Republicans.
Reply to this comment
by raymo15-2009 September 28, 2007 8:02 PM EDT
You went to .." one of your sources"...Al Jazeera, Al Jazeera for God''s sake. What about your other primary sources...Move On and Daily Cos ????
Reply to this comment
See all 48 Comments

60 Minutes

The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
Read More

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye