Across The Media Universe: Hair, Drugs and Rupe Edition

(AP)
Stoned Cold: Recent PE interviewee Maia Szalavitz has posted her thoughts on media coverage of “a new study claiming that marijuana increases the risk of later psychotic illnesses like schizophrenia by 40%.” She argues that most media coverage has neglected to point out that schizophrenia rates have not increased in line with marijuana use rates, a significant point in light of the study’s implications. She also complains that most accounts don’t quote prominent researchers who say that there is no conclusive proof that cannabis causes psychotic illness. “Such comments don't help the media stir up reefer madness, which they've been doing, quite successfully, for the last few decades,” Szalavitz concludes. “Perhaps covering the marijuana beat makes you crazy.”
My First Journal: It looks like Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp has won the battle to take over Dow Jones & Co. and its flagship Wall Street Journal. Is this, as some seem to think, going to result in the paper transforming from a first-rate news outlet to a mediocre publication willing to sell out its journalistic principles when it helps the parent company’s bottom line? We report, you decide.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
Soon the owners of the United States %u201Cthe private sector%u201D will only allow party propaganda as news to support their perpetual wars along with energy, medicine, food, and water shortages to maintain their complete and malevolent control of the plebs.
Gee, wonder why I don't believe that old B.S. about being a party of the little guy anymore....
If this doesn't trouble you, you get an autmomatic pass into the category of sycophant.
Very clever, Mr. Felling. Squeezing more mileage out of the haircut "story" and linking Edwards to Dukakis. A two-fer -- double axel into a toe loop and he NAILED the landing! That's pretty hilarious. We should put you down for one of those 30% of journalists who "hate" John Edwards then? Good to know, this early on. Yes, indeed.
Fairly or unfairly, there's also a difference in narrative timing: when the first quarter ended, the press was trying to bury Edwards. It's not so much interested in burying Romney right now -- many reporters think he's the Republican frontrunner."
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/07/romney_wore_makeup_film_at_ele.php
That's from Marc Ambinder, one of the founders of the conventional wisdom ("up is down") Note at ABC.
When is the press going to let us choose the President?
He's benefited because blogs combat journalists who want to make stupid fluff a character issue. How much do millionaire Republican Congressmen usually pay for a haircut? They'll never ask. Being rich is never a problem, so long as you line your own pockets. It's fine not to wear a tie, unless you're Obama, which sounds like Osama, so he must be trying to emulate the President of Iran. Aids scramble to explain one inch indentation sticking above Hillary's V-Neck!
Did it ever occur to you that if these people are "calculating" about what they wear, it's because you write stupid sh@% like this? As a reporter admitted recently, as with the past two presidential elections, the media hates them and wants to take them down -- but Republicans they want to have a beer with. So if you want to destroy him, he might as well point it out.