Public Eye
May 4, 2007 2:15 PM

CBSNews.com Turns Off Comments on Obama Stories

(AP Photo)
Today CBSNews.com informed its staff via email that they should no longer enable comments on stories about presidential candidate Barack Obama. The reason for the new policy, according to the email, is that stories about Obama have been attracting too many racist comments.

"It's very simple," Mike Sims, director of News and Operations for CBSNews.com, told me. "We have our Rules of Engagement. They prohibit personal attacks, especially racist attacks. Stories about Obama have been problematic, and we won't tolerate it."

CBSNews.com does sometimes delete comments on an individual basis, but Sims said that was not sufficient in the case of Obama stories due to "the volume and the persistence" of the objectionable comments.

There has been a fierce debate about how news outlets should handle reader comments. Washingtonpost.com's Jim Brady, whose site, like CBSNews.com, does not have the resources to filter comments in advance, told Howard Kurtz that he'd "rather figure out a way to do it better than not to do it at all."

But Post reporter Darryl Fears told Kurtz that comments should be eliminated if they can't be pre-screened for offensiveness.

"If you're an African American and you read about someone being called a porch monkey, that overrides any positive thing that you would read in the comments," he said.

CBSNews.com has no plans to disable comments on stories about the other presidential candidates, according to Sims. As for comments on Obama stories, he said the site is open to eventually bringing them back.

"We'd like to be able to return to them, and I'm not ruling that out," said Sims. "But at this point it's not possible."
Tags:
comments ,
barack obama ,
mike sims
Topics:
CBS News Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 37 Comments
by westsidebob June 4, 2009 11:12 AM EDT
I disagree strongly with the direction the president is taking our Republic. However, my comments here refer to the journalistic practices of CBS itself.

In my fifty five years of watching many elections come and go, I have never seen the sort of biased news coverage that was afforded the president when he was on the campaign trail. I never witnessed the sort of complete and utter character assassination that was afforded Governor Palin when she was on the campaign trail.

Now CBS has denied WND advertising space on its bill boards. WND wanted to post a board that asks; "Where is the birth Certificate?"

Its obvious to anyone with an open mind, such a response from CBS to WND to valid business proposition in a down economy; smacks of political censorship.

In the end, I won't change hearts, minds, or business practices based on politics with this comment. However, I do wish that CBS would be honest enough to admit thay are in the propaganda business not the business of journalism.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 7, 2007 5:46 PM EDT
"Perhaps the reason for this is to try to sweep under the rug the racial prejudice that exists with liberals and the Democratic Party in America, in order to promote a man of color within their party to the White House."
Posted by One_American at 02:31 PM : May 07, 2007

This is what Rush "the drugged up" Limbaugh said on his show in reference to his Magic Negro song%u2026 "by airing this song my friends (hick-up) I've exposed the drive-thru media for what they are folks". What I don't understand is why Rush Limbaugh, his listeners, and members of the Republic Party can't just consciously accept what they really stand for, it's not like it's a secret or anything.
Reply to this comment
by one_american May 7, 2007 5:31 PM EDT
It would appear (dare I say it) BIASED for CBS to be selective about which party's politicians they are willing to subject to derogatory commentary.

If heading off "offensiveness" is the objective here, then the more than abundant stream of venomous comments aimed at the President of the United States should have been turned off a long time ago.

But in fact, I am not advocating the elimination of "free speech", as CBS is; in fact I think CBS is making another serious mistake here, as the Imus debacle was shown to be.

Perhaps the reason for this is to try to sweep under the rug the racial prejudice that exists with liberals and the Democratic Party in America, in order to promote a man of color within their party to the White House.

Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 7, 2007 5:12 PM EDT
People should have some sort of basic assembly of order, or etiquette when discussing and criticizing each other on blog issues. But, more so professional media outlets should restrict overt and unconstructive hate and discriminatory comments. The EIB radio network should be castigated for airing Rush the Magic Negro Hater everyday on hundreds of radio markets. And, like I've stated before it's not really what Rush Limbaugh, or Ann Coulter say that is damaging it's the fact that many people in our country follow them.
Reply to this comment
by ritaflynn1 May 7, 2007 2:18 AM EDT
This is so sad. But CBS is doing the right thing to keep blatant racism off its web. If only more news organizations would follow suit.
Reply to this comment
by marie2233 May 6, 2007 9:25 PM EDT
Bigotry is ignorant-Calling Bush names is ign orant. Anyone remember Hillary blaming the right wing for making up the story of her husband having an affair? Did she ever apologize?
Reply to this comment
by portrower8 May 6, 2007 4:24 PM EDT
I think we should not block the comments. Get them out...expose them for what they are...
As the idiots out there post racist comments...the mass public can respond with the common sense and brain power lacking in the morons posting such comments.

There couldn't be anything better for Obama. I have heard so many people say he can't be electable because of his race -- let the racists post -- and then let's tear them a part.

-Obama supporter from Tennessee!
Reply to this comment
by graphictruth-2009 May 6, 2007 11:53 AM EDT
You know, I think this is a huge mistake - and from two perspectives.

First, it's unfair to racists.
Second, it's unfair to those of us who would like to engage them on ground favorable to us.

Oh, wait, there is a third point. Racism exists and it is newsworthy. Pretending it doesn't exist, for the sake of the tender hides of those targeted and those who would like to believe we are now all better people is just denial. If you like, emplace a digg-like system where readers can mod down offensive comments, while preserving the record OF those opinions.

"Porch monkeys." Snort. Yep - and everyone in the South was a "porch monkey" before air conditioning made it possible to be an INDOOR couch potato.

I mean, God forbid people should sit on their porches and interact with their neighbors, as opposed to Faux TV on the Hi-Def.

That comment alone is a priceless example of the inherent stupidity and willful ignorance required to maintain racism in the face of reality, and I think all such remarks should be allowed to stand in all their awful majesty.
Reply to this comment
by markleiman May 6, 2007 7:44 AM EDT
CBS shouldn't allow a "heckler's veto." Why should the racists be able to deny Obama's supporters a chance to comment on stories about him? Spend the money to assign a monitor, but don't give in to the cyberthugs.
Reply to this comment
by phil4876 May 6, 2007 1:59 AM EDT
Royal-Lyme, please research facts before stating them online. Senator Byrd has apologized over and over again for joining the KKK, saying "intolerance [has] no place in America." I'm not sure that Pat Robertson ever apologized for agreeing with Jerry Falwell's statement that 911 was caused by "abortionists, feminists, ***, lesbians, the ACLU....." Instead, he claimed his earpiece was malfunctioning and he didn't know what he was agreeing with. Interestingly, Tommy Thompson used the same excuse after stating the other night that employers should be able to fire their workers for being gay. What a coincidence.

Also it seems that whenever a liberal says something inflammatory (see Harry Reid, Don Imus, John Kerry), the media and the right wing jump all over them, but conservatives say those types of things all the time (Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, John Gibson), with almost no coverage of the left side's outrage or any media involvement. And I typically see Democrats apologizing and explaining, while Republicans tell us we're stupid and petty for being upset with them. Recall McCain's lack of an apology after singing "bomb, bomb Iran," choosing instead to tell his critics to "get a life."

I think it's safe to say that both sides harbor bigots, but it is MUCH more common among conservatives, especially since the Democratic platform is more geared towards minorities and that's a good proportion of their voter base.
Reply to this comment
by royal-lyme May 6, 2007 12:30 AM EDT
How are you so sure that it was Republicans who made racist remarks about Obama? I've met plenty of people on the Left who are are racist bigots. Bigotry and racism has no political bounds. For example, Senator Robert Byrd, the perennial Democrat, belonged to the KKK. Democrats and Lefties in general are so self-righteous; they love to contemplate how pure they are; and they love to see themselves doing so much good in the world.
Reply to this comment
by impch-w May 5, 2007 8:52 PM EDT
***! When I sign in to read the comments, it posts a previously written comment... I guess there's no hope for the technologically inept. If there's a moderator, please DELETE the duplicate post(s). Thank you.
Reply to this comment
by impch-w May 5, 2007 8:48 PM EDT
All Republicans are not racist bigots, but
all racist bigots are REPUBLICANS.
Reply to this comment
by quicksite May 5, 2007 7:13 PM EDT
I believe the comment posted elsewhere is true: Thanks, Republicans. You're not all bigots; but all bigots happen to be Republicans. Shame on all of you -- and for those who tolerate this kind of behavior within your "compassionate conservative" phony party.

Funny, how, think-tanked marketing phrases can't quite quell the inherent drives within your base.
Reply to this comment
by phoenixandy May 5, 2007 7:02 PM EDT
It's a harsh fact that 100% of all personal attacks, especially racist comments, on online message boards such as this is fueled by right-wing partisan hate poison from Fox News, talk radio and conservative bloggers. It may also be the reason why the Secret Service feels they need to give Sen. Barack Obama special protection.

All white people who have a racist attitude are insecure eunuchs who should not be allowed access to any computer. In fact, there should be a law enacted to take computers out of the hands of white trash racists.

I personally feel that all media outlets, whether they be TV news or newspapers, should continue to have blogs, but require that comments need to be approved before posting it or, better yet, but disable the comments section altogether, since most people on the Internet are either sexual predators or pedophiles anyway.

Another solution would be to require posters to reveal their full name and send into a message board database their mailing address, their phone number, E-mail address and a photo, so such posters would think twice before posting vitriolic, racist garbage.
Reply to this comment
by impch-w May 5, 2007 6:40 PM EDT
Apologies for the double post. I stand by the content, though.
Reply to this comment
by swift2--2008 May 5, 2007 5:41 PM EDT
I'm torn. The racist comments are disgusting, of course. But as a precedent, I'm not sure it's good. Feedback is often the most entertaining and pithy part of online journals, and if you start censoring the controversial, it worries me.

However, calling George Bush a fascist is an exaggeration based on what he's done. Spouting anti-black and anti-female hate speech is another thing. However, I wish CBS had just taken the more expensive approach: pay somebody to watch comments and delete racist comments.
Reply to this comment
by phil4876 May 5, 2007 5:16 PM EDT
Comparing this hate speech to the garbage that gets thrown at Bush by liberals is such an egregious misunderstanding of what is being said by both sides and why. While I strongly disagree with those extremists that call Bush a "fascist" and a "nazi," Bush supporters must realize that these comments are based on policies of the President's that offend people enough to spark these inflammatory labels.

Meanwhile, right wing bigots who are attacking Obama for his race (see FOX "news" using his middle name to defame him) are basing their attacks on racial prejudice, not any policy of his. There is an ENORMOUS difference between political ignorance and racial intolerance - CBS was right to make this move, and should not be condemned for not blocking other attacks as long as they're not overtly personal or defamatory.

"Mainstream" media being liberal is a joke; even Pat Buchanan and William Kristol have admitted that. Notice how much *** Clinton got for his impeachment, while Bush has suffered so little scrutiny by comparison for all the REAL scandals plaguing his administration.

And thom_77.....Bush really is pushing the Presidency closer to a dictatorship than at any point in our nation's history, so those attacks are actually legitimate.
Reply to this comment
by impch-w May 5, 2007 4:35 PM EDT
All Republicans are NOT racist bigots.
All racist bigots are Republicans.
Reply to this comment
by luckyoldson May 5, 2007 3:10 PM EDT
thom 77,
"I can't even begin to list with whats wrong with all of this."

You left out the fact that your a moron.
Reply to this comment
See all 37 Comments

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye