How CBS, And Its Competitors, Are Handling The Cho Materials

(APTN)
"In no case do we want this video to be used as wallpaper, in much the same way we did not want to use the video of the planes going into the World Trade Center or the buildings coming down," wrote Friedman.
This morning, the video and pictures were all over the CBSNews.com homepage. You could watch the video in the upper left hand corner of the site, and slightly further down on the right side; a large Flash slideshow of Cho's disturbing photos of himself ran in the middle of the page. As of this afternoon, the shooting is the lead story, but the video links are gone from the homepage, and the focus is now on the victims. That's by design, says CBSNews.com Editorial Director Dick Meyer.
"We felt we needed to make it prominent during one news cycle, because we have some readers who are primarily at-work users and they may not have had a chance to see it," said Meyer. "By mid-morning it didn't need to be smack dab in the middle. We're certainly sensitive to how disturbing it is."
I asked Meyer if it really mattered how prominently CBSNews.com showcased the video, since it is so easy for anyone who wants to find the video to do so.
"From a practical standpoint, no, it doesn't matter for most news consumers," said Meyer. "By this morning, it was omnipresent. It was omnipresent for savvy Web users by 8:15 last night."
ABC News released a statement about how they are handling the video. It reads in part:
We are planning to severely limit the use of the video. Obviously in the first news cycle there's some breaking news value to that video. But once that first news cycle has passed, the repetition of it is little more than pornography.Here's Matt Lauer discussing NBC's handling of the material on "Today":
There are some big differences of opinion right within this news division as to whether we should be airing this stuff at all, that we're taking the right course of action. But we've made the decision, because by showing some of this material, perhaps it'll help us understand or answer the question 'why?' Why did it happen? If we can examine how a person who can say what he says and then do what he did, fail to be taken off the streets prior to committing these murders. But let me say that while we will show you some of what we received, it will be just a very small percentage. Because to be honest, after you see a bit of it you're going to get the idea. We feel strongly that this is not video that we need to run in some kind of an endless loop, and so we will severely limit the amount of footage that you're going to see.On "Good Morning America" today, forensic psychologist Michael Welner argued that the videos should be pulled immediately, something that would be virtually impossible.
"If anybody cares about the victims in Blacksburg and if anybody cares about their children, stop showing this video now," said Welner. "Take it off the Internet. Let it be relegated to YouTube. This is a social catastrophe. Showing the video is a social catastrophe."
He added: "This is not him. These videos do not help us understand him. They distort him. He was meek. He was quiet. This is a PR tape of him trying to turn himself into a Quentin Tarantino character."
The media is the cause of repeat violence in our schools - disturbed people know you will deliver their "message" - because you always do.
STOP THE MADNESS - NOW!
ANGRY - From Salisbury MD
He said, "This is a social catastrophe." I couldn't agree more. This entire incident is.
While I mean no disrespect to the families whatsoever, how are we as a society supposed to learn from this if we compartmentalize the parts that are challenging to us? It's easier to be the compassionate one -- to be the shoulder to cry on -- than to really think about how this happened. Why did he develop the way that he did? How were we as a society unintentionally complicit in his angry mind? Most importantly, how can we prevent it in the future?
To censor these words and images is to sweep our societal responsibility for this tragedy under the rug. If we ignore this, then we become societal Kleenex -- just something to cry on and discard. We'll turn the channel back to American Idol or some such nonsense.
Cho was a minority and not a ladies man at that, else, it is my contention that "for the sympathy of one living being", he would have "made peace with all." (Quote comes from Mary Shelly's Frankenstein of 1994)
Same explannation holds true for Columbine and violence in world's sexually repressive societies.
Boys Barbara Ann. He has turned pathological killer like George Bush.
Cho was a minority and not a ladies man at that, else, it is my contention that "for the sympathy of one living being", he would have "made peace with all." (Quote comes from Mary Shelly's Frankenstein of 1994)
Same explannation holds true for Columbine and violence in world's sexually repressive societies.
Just like America -well look at Britney Speers and Mariln Monroe. Dammed to be in a mould forever that will kill the nicer sexual instincts..
Bring back "The Sound of Music" type movies I say!
Then see how our young folk respond upwards - not down in to the pits..
evansbrianjohn@gmail.com
http://connectkiwis.com
http://apoem.com
Cho was a minority and not a ladies man at that, else, it is my contention that "for the sympathy of one living being", he would have "made peace with all." (Quote comes from Mary Shelly's Frankenstein of 1994)
Same explannation holds true for Columbine and violence in world's sexually repressive societies.
Just like America -well look at Britney Speers and Mariln Monroe. Dammed to be in a mould forever that will kill the nicer sexual instincts..
Bring back "The Sound of Music" type movies I say!
Then see how our young folk respond upwards - not down in to the pits..
evansbrianjohn@gmail.com
http://connectkiwis.com
http://apoem.com
I believe much of the viewing audience would have appreciated viewing stories and pictures of the victims, honoring their memories. The "achievement" of having killed the most should not be a statistic that is publically recorded or mentioned.
Opening my morning newspaper and seeing his face and gun staring at me was offensive as was continually seeing his face and propaganda on my TV! I changed channels and refused to view any of it!
Their actions gave Cho's his pathetic fame he was hoping for and the actions of the network news will fuel the fires of future maniacs. Some time in the future, instead of 32 innocent people murdered, some other deviant will seek to out-do Monday's killed and the networks will share in complicity.
In a perfect world, I'd like to see no pictures of the killer in the future. We need to focus on the victims and fill the news with their stories. One family of an injured Virginia Tech student said it best today when they declined to be interviewed. Their reason, they wanted the focus to be placed on the lost. What a class-act! The networks should take example of that!
t
From: Gail in Tennessee
Yes, tell us the facts. No, don't run everything into the ground. Definitely, leave the grieving students and families alone. Don't stick a microphone under any and everybody's nose trying to get a comment that will get ratings. Responsible journalism is reporting the facts, and not reporting opinions as facts.
I appreciate CBS allowing me to vent my thoughts on this issue.
-
by brucesmall
April 20, 2007 1:42 PM PDT
- I have to give CBS some praise for restraint. The media in general, as usual, has run amok. Do we really need a horde of reporters descending on the parent's home, or a detailed bio on his sister, or tracking down the grandparents in Korea? This is essential news?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 14 Comments