Public Eye
April 13, 2007 12:34 PM

The Madrassa Rumor Returns

Liberal media watchdog group Media Matters has posted a complaint about Wednesday's installment of "Katie Couric's Notebook," which centers on Barack Obama's background. You can watch the Notebook by clicking on the video box.

"Is America ready to elect a president who grew up praying in a mosque?," Couric asks at the outset of the Notebook. She goes on to say this:
Barack Obama has arguably the most diverse religious background of any candidate ever. He was raised in Indonesia by a Christian mother and Muslim stepfather and attended a Catholic school -- but while growing up, also studied Islam. That background sparked rumors that he had studied in a radical madrassa, or Quranic school -- rumors his campaign denied, declaring that Obama is now a practicing Christian.
As Media Matters notes, on Jan. 23 CNN posted a story headlined "CNN debunks false report about Obama," noting "[a]llegations that Sen. Barack Obama was educated in a radical Muslim school known as a 'madrassa' are not accurate, according to CNN reporting." Other media outlets followed.

Media Matters is making a fair point here: To bring up the madrassa rumor and note only that "his campaign denied" it leaves open the possibility that the claim is true. Since we know that it is not, Couric would have been well served to have pointed out as much.
Tags:
Media Matters ,
Obama ,
Notebook
Topics:
CBS News Issues
Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by memekiller April 16, 2007 1:00 PM EDT
Thank you for this. I remember you were one of the few who didn't fall for the Drudge virus about Iran making non-Muslims where armbands (with the exception of CBS radio).
Reply to this comment
by maxfieldd-2009 April 15, 2007 5:18 PM EDT
Okay CBS NEWS, so what are you going to do about this contradiction between fact and faux news? It is only fair to make the correction as public and prominent as the original disinformation. If not, then a pox on your record and veracity.

Ms Couric can be blamed only to the extent that she is a mindless, Stepford-reader of other people's disinformation propaganda. We know (given the plagiarism of one of her writers) that she doesn't produce anything of her own accord. Who is going to take the blame for this shameless smear?
Reply to this comment
by cikaris April 15, 2007 2:51 PM EDT
There is no doubt that Katie Couric's commentary is flawed since it is factually incorrect. It would have been better had she studied the record more carefully. Instead of focussing on rumor and innuendo she should have just stuck to the facts.

For example, contrary to her assertion that Barack Obama%u2019s mother was a %u201CChristian mother,%u201D she was not a %u201CChristian mother%u201D by any reasonable standard. She was an avowed atheist. "She touted herself as an atheist, and it was something she'd read about and could argue," said Maxine Box, who was Dunham's best friend in high school. [Chicago Tribune, 25 March 2007].

In %u201CThe Audacity of Hope,%u201D Obama characterizes her orientation as secular. In his own words, his mother had a %u201Chealthy skepticism of organized religion.%u201D

In %u201CDreams from My Father%u201D Obama describes his mother as "a lonely witness for secular humanism."

The facts clearly show that she was definitely not Christian and by no stretch of the imagination was she a %u201CChristian mother.%u201D

Katie definitely needs to do her homework before commenting on this, or any other, issue.
Reply to this comment
by jimspice-2009 April 15, 2007 6:55 AM EDT
Forget the political bias, the a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/arts/television/12cbs.html?_r=1" NYT /a is reporting blockquote CBS News said yesterday it planned to install a new level of editorial oversight to its Web site since revelations that the CBS anchor Katie Couric read a plagiarized commentary on the site last week. /blockquote
Reply to this comment
by jerjantzen April 15, 2007 3:47 AM EDT
It is not a matter of Katie Couric inseting personal opinion/views into a news story, it is the Rovian style bias that is driving her reporting...'Killroy" is alive and well. Couric is getting paid to carry water for neocon agenda.
Reply to this comment
by tarthur727 April 14, 2007 6:12 PM EDT
Katie Couric demonstrated from week one where her political bias lies. In her first "free speech" segment, she had Rush Limbaugh and rejected Bill Maher as to partisian?! Ms. Couric has made one mis-step after another to zazz up the evening news ( Edwards interview and WSJ plagerism to name a few). Her interviews on the Today Show were more hard hitting and relevent than anything she has done as the ANCHOR for CBS News. The damage that she does for future nightly news broadcasters is for now incalcuable.

Oh, how I wish credibility could be restored...

Step 1 CBS: Hire a REAL journalist as your anchor.
Reply to this comment
by p_lukasiak April 14, 2007 4:57 PM EDT
The whole "Note" was pathetic -- not just Couric's "madrassa" nonsense.

Rather than ask the question, "Is America ready to elect a president who grew up praying in a mosque?," she should be asking "Just how stupid and bigoted are the American people?"

Barack Obama has been a Christian all his adult life. The fact that he studied Islam (as well as Christianity)-- and prayed in a mosque (as well as church) -- as a child, is relevant ONLY insofar as it provides him with unique qualifications at a time when US relations with the Islamic world are at an all-time low.

My guess is that what Couric really wanted to ask was "Is America ready for a black President?" but (like all the major media) has been afraid to touch that subject --- and for good reason. You ask that question, and the answer you get is "probably not; if a black conservative like Harold Ford Jr can't win against a non-incumbent in Tennessee in a year when GOP incumbents were being thrown out of office all over the country, its pretty obvious that the Democrats will have to write off all the Southern AND border states -- and just about sweep what left -- if they run a black progressive."

Katie Couric doesn't want to say out loud what everyone already knows -- there is more than enough racism in this country -- concentrated in the Confederate and border states --- for a Black Democrat to win without a miracle happening.
Reply to this comment
by ramguy06820 April 14, 2007 4:50 PM EDT
Rick Kaplan needs to get a grip on this show's reporting, or he'll have another "Rather-gate" on his hands. It seems like Katie is straining very hard to juice her ratings but a few more gaffes like this and hse'll have Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on her case.
Reply to this comment
by pbg3445 April 14, 2007 4:23 AM EDT
Neo-McCarthyite?
But didn't Ann Coulter prove (with a book with lots of footnotes!) that McCarthy was right?

So if they're Neo-McCarthyite they must be steadfast warriors for the truth!

Glad we cleared that up.
Reply to this comment
by mudlake54 April 14, 2007 3:38 AM EDT
Agenda? I thought it was healthy to have as many groups of concerned citixens as possible keeping an eye on what is published in our free speech country. If somebody is broadcasting false and harmful information it needs to be pointed out.

Is this the first time Katie has corrected her notebook?
Reply to this comment
by ceecee34 April 14, 2007 3:21 AM EDT
It's a shame CBS needed Media Matters to point out the bogus nature of Couric's "reporting." Out of nowhere she brings up rumors that had already been reported and then thoroughly debunked by a CNN investigative report from Indonesia where facts were obtained first hand--and yet puts it out there as if it were an open issue. It's tabloid journalism. Don't bother to get the facts, just go for a sensational story and rely on a lot of innuendo.
Reply to this comment
by oldhacks April 14, 2007 12:39 AM EDT
FIRE COURIC NOW! We're all done giving her a chance. Shes made it perfectly clear that she fully intends on keeping pace with the other partisan hacks out there and it does a severe disservice to this country in not delivering honest news. FIRE HER NOW! WE"RE DONE WITH HER. And while you're at it have a progressive commentator at the round table on sunday mornings instead of two conservatives.
Reply to this comment
by edrieb April 14, 2007 12:34 AM EDT
it seems like katie needs to re-read the standards and practices manual - inserting personal opinion or views into a news story is inappropriate and against cbs policy.

if this is NOT her personal opinion, then the only other option would be seriously incompetent reporting and research.

please return to the standard of cronkite, edwards, kuralt, collins, osgood and all - this biased and inaccurate reporting gives CBS a real black eye!
Reply to this comment
by oldhacks April 13, 2007 10:47 PM EDT
After Courics attack on Elizabeth I'm sickend by the site of her. CBS needs to give her that 40,000,000 dollar check and see her to the door befor she sinks this network. I miss Dan.
Reply to this comment
by unhipcat April 13, 2007 8:51 PM EDT
katie should stick with plagiarizing. at least she won't get her facts wrong that way.
Reply to this comment
by m2key-2009 April 13, 2007 8:42 PM EDT
"That's a page from my notebook. I'm Katie Couric," See -- BS News. There, fixed that.
Reply to this comment
by david.helms April 13, 2007 8:41 PM EDT
What exactly was the news event that prompted CBS News to re-air this discredited rumor. As far as I can tell, there was none. So I'm left with having to conclude that this was just a gratuitous attack on a Democratic presidential candidate.

And you wonder why your operation is sliding into irrelevancy?
Reply to this comment
by burfordholly April 13, 2007 8:32 PM EDT
It was not a "rumor," it was HOAX put out by the Moonies and picked up by Drudge and Fox.

It was HOAX like the hacking of Liebermann's web site, or the Licoln quote that members of Congress should "arrested, exiled, or hanged."
Reply to this comment
by coopermb1 April 13, 2007 8:17 PM EDT
You'll note that Media Matters only posts actual quotes of the speaker or author...they then provide the entire transcript in order to avoid the standard "taken out of context" defense....and then, if it's simply an inaccurate statement of fact, they provide the actual fact with links so that you can check it out yourself...as someone stated earlier they are transparent, open, and do nothing more than what they say they do which is to correct conservative misinformation...no name-calling, personal judgements, or subjective rants....just objective, accurate facts...kind of like what journalists are supposed to provide rather than this "fair and balanced" fallacy/fantasy that has nothing to do with true journalism.
Reply to this comment
by id269 April 13, 2007 8:01 PM EDT
Isn't this the way "news" works these days? Instead of there being any truth, there is only (as Stephen Colbert would say) "truthiness." There must always be a debate and both sides must be reported without commentary, despite the fact that one side verifiably incorrect. Why not parrot back the line of one side or the other even though it's clearly incorrect? Why not pretend there is a controversy, when there is only fact and lie?

This just in: Democrats and Republicans sparring. Democrats say the grass is purple, and Republicans insist that it's pink.

Why even bother to point out thte grass is green? Good for you Katie Couric; we're all proud of you reporting on the pink and purple grass.
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye