Al Gore's (Latest) Media Moment

(GETTY)
Gore is having quite a week – an Oscar win for his film, fawning praise from Hollywood stars, fantastic press. The Washington Post claimed on its front page that Gore may be "America's Coolest Ex-Vice President Ever," while Andrea Mitchell and Meredith Vieira also called the rather stiff ex-veep "cool" on "Today." Political observers are now speculating that Gore may harness his momentum for an '08 bid. "Former Vice President Al Gore's triumph at the Oscars is already stoking activists' pleas for him to make a dramatic late entry into the fractious presidential race," noted Mike Allen.
The "Evening News" got into the act last night too. "Now that Al Gore's documentary on global warming won an Oscar, a lot of people are wondering if he'll use it as a springboard for another presidential run," said Katie Couric. Gloria Borger discussed how "he's not just another defeated presidential candidate. He's an Oscar-winning environmental evangelist." Over on ABC, meanwhile, Charles Gibson trumpeted "Gore's Moment" "following his star turn at the Academy Awards."
All that buzz presumably has Republicans worried. Enter The Tennessee Center for Policy Research, "an independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan research organization dedicated to providing concerned citizens, the media and public leaders with expert empirical research and timely free market policy solutions to public policy issues in Tennessee." The group put out a release noting that Gore's home "consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year."
Matt Drudge gave the story huge play, and conservative blogs gleefully dismissed Gore as a hypocrite.
"George Bush lives environmentalism whereas Al Gore only gives it lip service, yet he's is hailed as God's greatest gift to the environment," wrote blogger Kim Priestap. She was but one of many conservatives jumping on the story. (Gore's office has responded to the charge, saying the Gore family has "taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their private residence" and has puchrased carbon offsets "to offset the family’s carbon footprint.")
Gore has faced his share of criticism, legitimate and otherwise – remember the "invented the Internet" stuff? The events of the last few days have surely reminded him of the media wringer that comes with a presidential campaign. It's got to be a lot more fun to bask in praise from Leonardo DiCaprio than put oneself smack in the middle of the impending political storm.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
Secondly, I would be VERY interested in knowing how the Swiftboat Veterans for Kilowatt Hours got their hands on his utility bill.
If it isn't a forgery, then it's been illegally obtained. Funny, how the right-wing objections to leaking just evaporate when it's one of their own stooges doing it, eh?
Let's get things straight.... You CANNOT compare Al Gore's house to the average house. Why? Because his house is also his office and Tippers office.
They have a staff and office equiptment which means that gas and electric will be higher than a private residence.
Gore's house uses energy efficient lights and will be moving to solar panels shortly.
Oh and the electric he uses is more expensive becuase it comes from renewable sources.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDk3NDNlMDAwMWNhNTJmZmFmYzY5NjQ3ZDE3MWY1Mzc=
Let me see now..Who do we believe...The great majority of climatologists or...starlight/starbright?
You are a fool. How can anyone be motivated to change anything when the very people who spout this nonsense don't follow their own advice??
I could care less if Gore has changed every light bulb in his house (which I bet he has!); he single-handedly has gotten the worlds most important crisis on the map and being acted-on.
As for him being President? Just stop and think about the last several years. How many 100,000s of people do you think would still be alive if Gore were behind the wheel instead of the right-wing nut job we've had. I voted for Gore (who, let's not forget WON the popular vote), but was Bush-Whacked!
And don't you dare make any comment about his efforts if you haven't seen the movie! Everyone needs to see this movie! Bubba needs to just hold his tongue. Yeah Right! ;)
Sincerely,
David
http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/greenland/
Let's start right there. How did they get the utility bills? They also didn't have the courtesy to ask Vice President Gore about them (despite their hollow claim of being non-partisan.) And why would a "think tank" possibly care about what Al Gore spends on gas?
Actually, let's start with a more basic question. Who are these people? Well , a quick check of Alexa reveals their web site gets no traffic. Are they legitimate? Well, again, they claim to be non-partisan but only link to far-right and conservative groups so regardless of what their status is with the IRS, this is a conservative, strongly-leaning Republican organization
The world as we know it cannot be changed over night, I would like to be more efficient and have alternatives readily available for my transportation and energy needs.
After Al Gore completes his model energy efficient house, then what will the right wing have to attack with? It is clear the Republicans are pro-Global Warming, and there is nothing else.
The GOP should try to incorporate all the hot air they produce into some sort of co-generation program!
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3085ee175c.htm
http://www.hgtv.com/hgtv/pac_ctnt_988/text/0,,HGTV_22056_56190,00.html
- by mattcat25 February 27, 2007 4:01 PM EST
- Whether Al Gore is an energy hypocrite, or not, doesn't change the fact that Republican Party anti-Global Warming tactics and support of polluting industry for profit is a constant indignity. Global Warming isn't a political issue, it's a humanitarian concern.
- Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments