Has The "Evening News" Gotten Better? Or Worse?
I was talking to a CBS News correspondent the other day about the quality of the "Evening News," and the conversation turned to the notion, popular among media critics, that the "Evening News" has declined in quality over the years. The correspondent said he believed that the show has actually improved, in large part because journalists have learned to tell stories more clearly and efficiently over time.
To test the theory, I've dug up an episode of the "Evening News" from Nov. 18th, 1964. The anchor is Walter Cronkite, and the top story is an announcement by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara of a large reduction in military bases. Bill Plante – who you can still see on the "Evening News" today – offers a report from the Brooklyn Navy Yard. And the first commercial you'll see is for Parliament cigarettes -- apparently, tobacco tastes best when the filter's recessed. (You'll love the jingle.)
Anyway, have a look at the show by clicking on the video box above. I've also included a link to Tuesday's episode of the "Evening News" for comparison's sake. Decide for yourself if the show has improved or declined over the years.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
Walter Cronkite was the first to caution that he couldn't cover everything on the Evening News, but this sample proves it wasn't for want of trying. Notice how crisp and clean Walter's broadcast was. No glitz. The introduction was quick. The teasers before the breaks were pithy. There were only four minutes of advertisements and no cross-promotion of other CBS News programs. There was more time for the news, and more was delivered. Of course it was a better broadcast, and CBS should take note: "That's the way it was."
They gave a good 5 minutes on the Monday after Hillary declared that she is running for President. Apparently, they didn't have enough time left to even mention that Sam Brownback (R) was running.
Hey Katie: It's OK to run stories of fallen heroes. But why don't you call them "Fallen Heroes"? There are tons of LIVING hereos in parts of the world that you've never heard of, fighting for your right to spew your liberal bias.
Nowadays, video can be beamed live to the audience, sometimes without regard for context or fairness, accuracy, or the dilligent fact-checking necessary to get the story right.
This has proven in the recent past be a convenient excuse for those with an agenda to slant the news.