Couric & Co.
January 15, 2007 9:14 AM

Katie: A Woman At The Table

One week ago, Katie sat down for a briefing at the White House, and noticed something unusual.

(CBS)
Last Wednesday, President Bush gave his address to the country about “the new way forward” for Iraq, and lots of journalists—including me, of course—were in Washington to cover it. But before the Big Speech, there was the little-known Big Meeting.

The White House invited all the network anchors, and some cable anchors, along with the Sunday political show hosts to a meeting with unnamed VERY senior administration officials. (Obviously I know their names, but the agreement was that in order to attend the meeting, we couldn’t reveal the people who spoke to us.)

And even though I’ve been in this business for more years than I’d like to admit, and interviewed countless Presidents and world leaders, it’s still thrilling—and even a little awe-inspiring—to get “briefed” at the White House, no matter who is sitting in the Oval Office.

And yet, the meeting was a little disconcerting as well. As I was looking at my colleagues around the room—Charlie Gibson, George Stephanopoulos, Brian Williams, Tim Russert, Bob Schieffer, Wolf Blitzer, and Brit Hume—I couldn’t help but notice, despite how far we’ve come, that I was still the only woman there. Well, there was some female support staff near the door. But of the people at the table, the “principals” in the meeting, I was the only one wearing a skirt. Everyone was gracious, though the jocular atmosphere was palpable.

The feminist movement that began in the 1970’s helped women make tremendous strides—but there still haven’t been enough great leaps for womankind. Fifty-one percent of America is female, but women make up only about sixteen percent of Congress—which, as the Washington Monthly recently pointed out, is better than it’s ever been...but still not as good as parliaments in Rwanda (forty-nine percent women) or Sweden (forty-seven percent women). Only nine Fortune 500 companies have women as CEO’s.

That meeting was a reality check for me—and not just about Iraq. It was a reminder that all of us still have an obligation to ask: Don’t more women deserve a place at the table too?

Tags:
katie couric ,
white house
Topics:
Field Notes
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 72 Comments
by kenthe2-2009 January 18, 2007 3:14 PM EST
joycewest,
Child care benefits? Whatever happened to parents being responsible for their own children? There are some things that should never change. If both parents working means that children are to be raised by someone other than the parents, then there is a severe problem. It might sound old-fashioned, but if the old way works, leave it alone.
By the way, this quota Rwanda imposes on its Parliament and these fabulous child-care benefits Sweden provides have sure done a lot to advance those nations on the world's scene. Would people (including Ms. Couric) please quit using other nations, especially waste-of-time nations like these, as some sort of useless standard by which we should judge our own nation. When Rwanda or Sweden can honestly and justifiably take the title of 'the greatest nation on earth' away from the U.S., maybe then we can idolize them as beacons of hope in an old-fashioned USA, but until then let's find some Better Standard by which to judge ourselves.
Reply to this comment
by joycewest January 18, 2007 2:19 PM EST
I got to thinking after reading your post about why is it that women are not in positions of power in this country in greater numbers. I felt instinctively that Sweden has greater female representation in politics because of its very generous child care benefits. However, I was curious about Rwanda, and in the little research I did I was intrigued to find out that Rwandan law -- since 2003 I believe -- requires a third of its Parliament to be female. Beyond that, initiatives there focus on the role women played and continue to play in helping the country rebuild after the genocide. The background here is actually very interesting for those who want to look beyond stereotyping. Back to the U.S., I think lack of help with caregiving hinders women to some extent. However, clearly Rwanda shows how the caregiving role can be the impetus to get into politics.
Reply to this comment
by rkkirizzy January 18, 2007 12:02 PM EST
Katie,
When you say "deserve" what are you emplying? Should we just hand over elected positions in congress or turn over CEO positions to women just because they are women? No, our country grants all sexes the oppurtunity to serve as our representatives and elected officals. If you want more women in Congress should you not be encouraging women to vote for women (if 51% of the population is made up of women then you should be good to go). Frankly it does not matter to me if it is a man or a woman that represents myself and my country, just ensure they have my best intrests in mind and are not on some personal mission to set their agendas into motion. Take a look at your progression as a professional. Would you be satisfied if you did not earn your role as a leader in the media industry through hard work and great talent? I think you would not be happy if you were just handed your position due to your ability to wear a "skirt". Oh, in the future please due not ever compare my Great Nation to Rwanda or Sweden, that is an insult.
Reply to this comment
by auklandfan January 18, 2007 11:25 AM EST
Katie asks, "Don%u2019t more women deserve a place at the table too?" The answer is yes; however, the "womens's rights groups" are more focused on abortion, lesbian rights, anti-war, environment and far left ideology. Take a look at the NOW.ORG front page and you find nothing about education other than an ad for NOW on campus. Unless you espouse to their left wing agenda you are not a true feminist or whatever tag they want to place on an individual.
Reply to this comment
by terri1957 January 18, 2007 10:40 AM EST
What does it matter about the demographics? This is America, and there are plenty of other careers available to women. Did you ever think that just maybe women dont want a career such as yours? Maybe they want to be at home more, maybe they just want a private life with family... maybe they want to stay at home with the kids. Remember, Katie, this is the USA.. not all females want what you have.
Reply to this comment
by pokenhorn January 18, 2007 10:00 AM EST
To reach Katie's goal would require quotas everywhere. Quotas are people telling other people what to do. Bad idea. Imbalances by race and gender exist everywhere....athletics, science, and so on. Freedom first. Social tinkering last, if ever at all.
Reply to this comment
by brentclanton-2009 January 18, 2007 9:18 AM EST
So Katie--who, in addition to you, wearing a skirt, should have been included at the table...and who among that august group should have been replaced by someone wearing a skirt?
Reply to this comment
by rlbaker0000 January 18, 2007 9:04 AM EST
So which woman or women who were supposed to be there were excluded? Perhaps Ms. Couric would have been satisfied had a few women been selected at random from the Washington phone book and invited to attend. This identity group political movement has grown very tiring, and those who still subscribe to it come off as extremely vaccuous for adhering to it.
Reply to this comment
by ghgore January 18, 2007 7:25 AM EST
As long as the premiere female woman in mainstream news continues to make such cliche statements as this for women... "it%u2019s still thrilling%u2014and even a little awe-inspiring%u2014to get %u201Cbriefed%u201D at the White House, no matter who is sitting in the Oval Office.", don't expect things to get better.

Yes, the characature of many female managers being particularly more defensive and standoffish with female coworkers is true. Yes, the catty, "just HAVE to get it in there" comment by women is true. And, yes, there IS a reason why there were more men at that table.
Reply to this comment
by midashand January 18, 2007 7:23 AM EST
Just because our ratio of men to women in Congress is not near a 1:1 ratio doesn't mean that we don't have equality in our government....

Last I checked, our officials are elected. This fact, coupled with the statement that 51% of America is women, leaves little room for unequality jabs.

If a woman wants to run for an elected office... nothing is stopping her.... If a woman wants to vote for a woman... nothing is stopping her. Anyone can vote for whoever they like. As it stands now, fewer women run and fewer women get elected. Not because women are barred from holding office.... but because women don't run for office nearly as much as men do. And, that.... is their choice

The people elect the government, never forget that. You seem to think that having more women in congress is automatically a good thing. The truth may be a different story. In the end, we Americans have the freedom to choose who we want in office representing us... If it so happens that that particular person happens to be male, so be it. If it so happens that that particular person happens to be female, so be it.

But saying we still suffer from unequality is just plain.... well... silly!
Reply to this comment
by jimboblaze7 January 18, 2007 6:47 AM EST
Third, anyone who has been following the news can see that Bush is a complete flop regardless of one's political affiliation. Republicans in Congress are distancing themselves from this guy like he has bird flu. I get a kick out of the uptight rubes (and there's a FEW of them as I recall) who have used phrases such as "sitting President" and (my heavens!) "Commander in Chief" as if to equate George Bush with Jesus Christ or God. He isn't God, he's a stubborn and foolish man who has done a horrendous job of leading this country. I'm sure these holier-than-thou posters were just FURIOUS when "Commander in Chief" Clinton was dragged through the mud and insulted by EVERYONE (including the so-called "liberal media"). Suuuuure they were...hypocrites.

As for Couric, I'm not a fan, but not for the reasons many of the goofy reactionaries on this thread are spouting...I simply think she covers unimportant stories too frequently. People knocking her for libral bias should get a life...the comment was completely indirect and unspecific. THEY put the meaning there in their heads because deep down they KNOW Bush is staggeringly unpopular (and he is). This isn't about politics, its about a lousy reporter trying to do right by not sniffing the throne of a lousier President. You hear that Conservatives? GW Bush will be a JOKE in the history books. A JOKE! And you goofy Conservatives will all eat crow...
Reply to this comment
by jimboblaze7 January 18, 2007 6:44 AM EST
All the Conservatives on here who are complaining about that "no matter who is in office" line need to get a reality check. For one thing, Katie only said that because she's been frequently criticized for not being "hard news" enough. Think about it...what would people be saying if she ONLY talked about how wonderful it was to sit in the Oval Office? You'd say she "lacked objectivity" by letting herself be wowed by the experience. I can see the Drudge headlines now..."Couric swoons at White House...brown nose?" Think about it...

I especially liked the hypocrite who complained about Couric's "bias" and then said "Brit Hume should have been the only reporter there". Oh really? So when a Democrat is President I guess we can ban all Fox News reporters eh? Fox News is EXTREMELY biased to the right (and logic would dictate that Conservative bias is bias nontheless) and only ask tough questions when the stench of incompetance and corruption is so strong that spin simply doesn't work (Hurricane Katrina, Mark Foley, the last election).

Reply to this comment
by petersemkiw January 18, 2007 6:21 AM EST
Dear Katie, I am so very happy and proud that you are the first woman at that table! I think more women deserve places at that table, too,as long as they are well qualified and have good table manners, and good manners in general,which as you know, are getting harder and harder to find anywhere!!including the internet!!! You are as great a broadcast journalist as any of your other colleagues sitting at that table and in addition you are the Managing Editor and Anchorwoman of the CBS Evening News as well,and have brought new journalistic and artistic creativity,intelligence, humor,sensitivity,and warmth to the cold, hard,and these days, often bitter news! I wouldn't watch anyone else! You are the amazing Katie "Columbus" Couric who passes by Columbus Circle,the Christopher Columbus Statue, and its beautiful gushing fountains almost every single day! Like Christopher Columbus, you have the courage and fortitude to sail the oceans,despite the threats of severe storms ,and of firebreathing monsters, dragons, and crawling reptiles that inhabit the seven seas and some countries of the world, and even live along parts of the Hudson River! Just get out your Laser Sword,and May the Force Be With You!And,as I've said before, if you need any help,I'll personally come down there and help you "take care" of any firebreathing monsters,dragons and crawling reptiles like Arnold Schwarzenegger used to do - even on crutches!!!
Reply to this comment
by trwxxa January 18, 2007 5:22 AM EST
"Fifty-one percent of America is female, but women make up only about sixteen percent of Congress%u2014which, as the Washington Monthly recently pointed out, is better than it%u2019s ever been."

Katie, you need to understand that to get into Congress, you need to win an election. Its not a group of people that are suppose to mimic the diversity of the US population. If so we would have even more stupid Congress people.
Reply to this comment
by soothsayer59 January 18, 2007 4:14 AM EST
And even though I%u2019ve been watching the news for more years than I%u2019d like to admit, and have seen countless news anchors, it%u2019s still thrilling to watch the news each night hoping that it will be "reported" and not "written", and I wish I could say "no matter who is sitting at the anchor desk".... but I can't. There is a reason that you are failing in the ratings and it's not because you are a woman. It's because you present written opinion as news instead of reporting unbiased events.
Reply to this comment
by djs67-2009 January 18, 2007 4:10 AM EST
True there should be more women in powerful media positions, but I%u2019m more concerned about WHAT was said or dictated to the media at this %u2018little known meeting%u2019. People get upset by Katie%u2019s %u2018tilt%u2019 @ CBS, miffed that she%u2019s so cute, outraged by the %u2018liberal media elite%u2019. I love to turn on State-run Fox news to get my sunny fair and balanced view of the end of times. Remember Katie got her job because Dan Rather %u2013 heaven forbid %u2013 accused our President - $affirmly acted$ into Yale - of being a spoiled rich brat draft-dodger who lied, cheated and stole his way to the White House. I%u2019m still wondering how Katie and the liberal media elite w/all it%u2019s power and influence couldn%u2019t stop Bush/Cheney from killing 650,000. people - stealing their progenys'oil and unwittingly turning Iraq into Iran west?
Reply to this comment
by don5028 January 18, 2007 4:05 AM EST
Out of eight people, Katie was the only female at the table. Did she notice that Brit Hume was the only one out of the eight who was not liberal? And even more important, at least four of the eight have worked directly for Democrat polititions; e.g., former presidents Carter and Clinton. Now THAT'S bias! Unfortunately, Katie is too self-absorbed to notice.
Reply to this comment
by hellokatie-2009 January 18, 2007 3:55 AM EST
Hello Katie,

Read your blog. I know you're a busy person, so please appreciate my direct message.

You have never been a credible hard journalist, and you should know it. If you don't know it, you have been pumped up by those who, unsuccessfully, have tried to exploit your TV popularity. I don't think this is your fault, directly. You have been given opportunities for two reasons: you are intelligent, intuitive and pleasant, and you are attractive. You do a great job at morning light-news lifestyle shows. You, however, are not a hard journalist. You simply don't have a solid grasp of the world. I have witnessed significantly superficial interviews by you and feel CBS management was, well, simply dumb in putting your in your current position.

I regard you much more highly than this email may seem. But you're wrong in blaming anti-feminism for your being in that room where you felt alone. Clearly woman belong in the room. But you don't. If you didn't feel comfortable, it is because it is YOU shouldn't be there. You simply have not earned it, and do not really want it. If you don't agree with me, and if you can, please do a show to educate me

Merideth V? is no subsitute for you, and you need to go back to the Today Show and do what you do well.

Thanks for years of good TV, but not on CBS, and not as a hard news journalist anywhere. Enjoy your life, you don't need to prove anything.
Reply to this comment
by chocolatefro January 18, 2007 3:06 AM EST
Katie, do you think that because someone possesses a uterus that gives them all the clout they need to attend the meeting? What ever happened to the phrase "most qualified?" This has become such an "even steven" world. I'm so tired of the whining over having an equal number of males, females, blacks, whites, hispanics, etc. It should be quality, not quantity. Katie, perhaps you were the only female principal that could have been invited to the meeting.
Reply to this comment
by retsacnal1 January 18, 2007 2:33 AM EST
For a "journalist" she shows a weak grasp of the English language. "Jocular" means funny, or humorous, and has nothing to do with gender or gender roles. So, everyone was gracious in spite of a light-hearted athmosphere. ??? What is that supposed to mean? Or was she trying to imply that everyone was gracious in spite of the palpably "jock," macho, masculine athmosphere?

Palpable isn't a good journalistic word; it's a worn-out, amateurish, freshman literature kind word.

And why is it that the few women who manage to attain these "heights" are always so self-congratulatory? Did you "cut in line," Catie? Do you have the "power?"

Keep in mind people, for all the women who aren't Fortune 500 CEOs, Congresswomen or Senators, there are essentially the same number of men who aren't either. Those people number around a thousand, and there are millions and millions of people in this great nation.
Reply to this comment
See all 72 Comments

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR