Couric & Co.
January 10, 2007 12:12 PM

Co-Bloggers: Katie & Bob Preview The Speech

(CBS)

Chief Washington Correspondent Bob Schieffer and Katie attended a briefing this morning at the White House, giving a preview of tonight's speech. Here’s their report of what they were told.



The plan the president will outline tonight will call for increasing the number of American military troops in Iraq by more than 20,000, a move that will force the administration to extend the tours of duty for many troops in Iraq by two to four months, according to White House officials.

In a briefing for network anchors, officials said it may also require calling some reservists and members of the National Guard to active duty.

They also said the President will acknowledge that the current policy has failed. They said the President would characterize the policy as “not working, that what was happening was not acceptable to the American people or to him.”

These officials said the President was aware that he was going against public opinion and congressional sentiment.

Those who know the President said he knew he was “sticking his neck out.”

But the President is known to feel that the country can’t afford to fail and, while he recognizes there is a consensus on that, no one—including those in Congress—has come up with a solution.

Officials say the current plan will divide Baghdad into nine neighborhoods with the majority of Iraqi military taking charge, supported by smaller numbers of U.S. forces.

Their aim is to reassure Iraqis that their own forces will be providing security.

While the President will outline his plan tonight to the American people, he will also make it clear that American patience is not unlimited. His message to the Maliki government and the Iraqi military will essentially be, “You have to perform.”

People who have been around the President in recent days say he has had it with the Iraqi government, and has told them in no uncertain terms that things have to change, that they must decide if they can live together, that they must stand up and that these messages have been delivered directly to Maliki.

White House officials also think the internal dynamics of Iraq may be working in their favor--that if Maliki can’t step up to the plate, there is competition, so he’s feeling the pressure externally and internally. They also believe that the pressure Congress is putting on the President will actually be helpful, and that it drives home to Maliki the pressure President Bush is facing.

These officials say the main thing the Maliki government needs to understand is that they could lose their primary benefactor, George Bush, if they don’t pick up their share of the burden. An interesting back story, by the way, is this: the White House says this is Maliki’s plan that was presented to the President Bush in Amman, Jordan. It was reviewed by General Casey, who added the additional US troops because the Iraqis, he felt, were not up to speed.

The President, these officials say, knows he will get some opposition from Congress, but is banking on their support because, if they cut off funding, he believes opponents will be seen as putting American troops in harm’s way. If Americans see it that way, the White House will spell it for them.

When asked about a “Plan B,” White House officials paused and said: “Maybe you should ask the Iraqi’s about their Plan B.” Clearly the onus is on Maliki and the Iraqi government, and White House officials continue to insist they believe this latest strategy, unlike its previous plans, will work.



Tags:
katie ,
speech ,
Iraq
Topics:
Field Notes

Video and Galleries

Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by theanchores January 10, 2007 1:49 PM PST
How can the president be going "against congressional sentiment" when the Democrats have been saying "we need more troops" for a few years, now? Have the Democrats changed their minds? Did they only support troop increases when they thought Bush wouldn't do it? Or are they just in knee-jerk opposition to any position Bush takes?

Senate Democrats call for increase in troops: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/14/politics/14army.html?ex=1168578000&en=65adbaafab411966&ei=5070

Pelosi for the surge before she was against it: http://www.iowavoice.com/2007/01/10/pelosi-was-for-a-surge-before-she-was-against-it/

Bush Critics call for more troops: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/06/29/national/w075030D43.DTL

Reid backs temp. rise in troops:http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2006-12-17T220051Z_01_N17432969_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-IRAQ.xml
Reply to this comment
by educates January 10, 2007 2:33 PM PST
George Bush went to war without enough troops. 20,000 more will not be enough troops. It will cut our military response to other situations such as Darfur, Iran, Korea, Palestine, Lebanon. We cannot afford to keep fighting a war without a purpose. The current purpose as stated by Bush, is to have a country that can sustain itself. The country could sustain itself when we went there. More troops equate to total American insanity. We are despised by the world. France is rubbing our noses in it by saying "We told youso." Hell, everybody, including the UN told us so.
Pull the troops home. No more lies. No more false promises. No more.
Impeach if he goes against us.
ed u cates
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 10, 2007 2:43 PM PST
So, Democrats have been saying all along that "we need more troops". Now the Democrats want to say "too little too late".

Democrats run the serious risk of looking like they are surrendering, if they don't make this last best effort to make Iraq a success. If they choose to deny the President, then the failure of the Iraq War, and a failed Iraq State will be entirely on the heads of DEMOCRATS, AND DEMOCRATS ALONE.
Reply to this comment
by tejasdemo January 10, 2007 4:09 PM PST
Bush and Republicans are complete morons. No more money for Iraq ! No more Republicans ! No more Bush !

Dems--have the guts to tell Bush to go to hell and do what 75% of the entire country (and, I'd say that's a majority) want-GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW !
Reply to this comment
by lambcannon January 10, 2007 5:45 PM PST
Ms. Couric states in her interview that folks feeling discomfort with her braindead "news broadcast" they should consider a suppository.

That's great, K.T. As someone who has watched CBS news every night for twenty-five years, I am considering that suppository right now, and exactly where it should be permanently implanted. Thanks so much for your "youth-conscious excellence."
Reply to this comment
by dblclik January 10, 2007 6:00 PM PST
Give our people in the military a chance to see
that all their sacrifice has not been for naught.
Bad leadership decisions have been written in stone through the age's. I can't see them coming
home as defeated, after all the horror they have
experienced. I know, it stays with you forever.
Remember that little "Police Action" in South East Asia. We came home to jeer's and things thrown at us, by our own people, after we saw
our best friends die. For nothing. It truly sucks.
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 10, 2007 6:55 PM PST
Tonight President Bush will outline in his speech the plan that the Iraqi Government, the Troops on the Ground, and the Baker Commission all contributed to, and support.

As a responsible American, your job is to pay attention to the speech, because this is, in fact, what we will be doing to achieve success in Iraq.

Any foolish brinkmanship by the Democrats to deny funding will be paramount to the Democrats declaring defeat in Iraq, and would signal waving the white flag to Islamic radicals and terrorist, and would mean the permanent end of the Democratic Party.

My guess is the Democrats, even though they will go into hyper-sound-byte mode, and seethe about a troop increase of 22,000 - they will go along with it, purely for self-preservation of their party.

After a successful completion of the mission in Iraq, the Democrats will hold private meetings on how to claim all the credit for the success.
Reply to this comment
by tonytang-2009 January 10, 2007 9:50 PM PST
Iraq war is all about oil money for big oils who actually started this war(Bush is just their represents, he had no chiose but to start this war). Big oils calcaulated no matter win or loss of the war, they would make huge money from this war both long turn and short turn. Troop surge or not, America and American already lost the war, middle class american are going to pay for this war for generations.
Reply to this comment
by sjahaase January 10, 2007 9:52 PM PST
I agree with the person who posted why does the President not send his own girls there? Easy to send some one elses love one for his experiment. This president uses the word terrorist over and over. He uses the fear position too much that I believe most Americans are sick and tired of that platform. When the Generals disagreed with him he changed them (I spoked to one of those generals)! I look back to history and hear a voice load and clear %u201Cwe have nothing to fear but fear itself!%u201D We should of never went there. Sadam was going to use chemical warfare against us, he never did. We have see over 3,000 men & women of our armed forces die for what, how many injured? Also lets not forget how many Iraq people are being killed each day! We have spent dollars we do not have but told some in our land that we will cut back on their own benefits. He is not a leader; he has engaged us in a struggle we never asked for. He lied to us, in the beginning, the middle (the mission was over on the ship he flew on to) and now! If the Democrats do not cut off the funds they are not listening to the people as well, the next election will be the removal of all with ties to this mess!

Reply to this comment
by sjahaase January 10, 2007 10:07 PM PST
Oh by the way katie keep up the good work. If someone does not like what you say hey it is America, turn the channel! This is the harsh environment we now live in. a government that no longer talk but uses force. I watched last week how the voice of President Ford could of and should of taught us, our now president a lesson. A true leader leads and does not have to be the biggest bully on the block. We now have more enemies than in 2001. Some who were for us are now against us. There does come a day when someone has to stand up and say enough is enough! We can%u2019t just say we can do and go anywhere we please. The truth is that Sadam was about to step down and we had him surrounded under control. Now those borders allow the vast land of Iraq to be a training ground to kill ore troops and Iraq citizens. Sadam was wrong but we were above him because we were civilized, at least that is what the world used to say. So the bullies who now attack you, Katie stand firm, let them got to fox and listen to that guy who I would not say his name or write to him. If I do not like something I am not going to waste my time and write to them, unless it is about my country that I fought for. We need a healer again like President Ford!

You, Bob and the staff are doing a great job!
Reply to this comment
by movsrus January 10, 2007 10:08 PM PST
Iraq is a mess and is past the point of hope. The time when the US could influence events there is long past and the Shiite and Sunni radicals are only marking time until they can go after each other with wonton abandon. When they do, rivers of blood will run in the streets and it will make the genocide in Rwanda look pale in comparison.

It is time to leave Iraq and know that history will judge Bush and the American intervention there as a colossal mistake. Bush's legacy will be that of a fool whose pride prevented him from ending the insanity before hundred of thousands of innocents were killed or maimed.

Hopefully, the Democrats will stop this insanity but refusing to commit the funds for the proposed buildup. It is time to bring all the troops home and let the Iraqi destroy themselves in religious extremism if that is their desire.
Reply to this comment
by jcorbin1958 January 10, 2007 10:27 PM PST
Katie, play no attention to the wacko's who criticize you and the job you are doing. You're doing great. Way to go CBS for having the good sense to hire Katie Couric!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by sjahaase January 10, 2007 10:40 PM PST
I want all to think about this. The troop build up will have American troops living outside of the base. These troops will not return to base each night. It is one thing to go on patrol in Iraq, I have done it but now to sleep out in Baghdad. There will be more American casualties. Some of my friends are now on there 4th time there. It is like rolling dice, to survive 3 times there is a miracle in itself. We are fighting the enemy but we really don%u2019t know who they are so now we call them terrorist because it inflames the American mind! This is a war that we destroyed a country that has two religions that hate one another, the one that is in control now was not in control before and is ruthless as the prior one.
Reply to this comment
by mindyakern January 11, 2007 12:42 AM PST
About that "clear mission": My son is a U.S. Marine soon to be deployed. He understands his mission thoroughly--work to quell sectarian violence. This is a reqion inhabited by people who may have never learned tolerance, or who, if they've ever practiced tolerance, have seen that effort disrespected by extremists. The Iraqi people might be actually pulled from the cycle of violence if given another focus-their children. U.S. forces could help re-build schools and then help guard them- giving Iraqi children a safe place to be. Diplomatic efforts could include encouraging Iraqi government to encourage Muslim educators to teach tolerance along with educating. Ten years from now, there just might be a thoroughly educated Iraqi public capable of governing itself peacefully. As a mother, it horrifies me that parents in Iraq have to accept daily death in the streets as a part of their childrens' lives. As a U.S. Marine's Mom--I'm proud of my son, and proud that my country is doing something in Iraq versus leaving the Iraqi people to their own, obvious fate.
Reply to this comment
by flolake January 11, 2007 3:46 AM PST
I have felt since the "WMD" issue turned out to be mostly smoke & mirrors, that there was a lot more that had not been discovered.

Is this latest Bush push a save face move? God help us for giving the insurgents too much advance notice.

At this point I am unsure if there is a clear way out. Pelosi or no Pelosi.

We do need a fast track out of Iraq but our casualty losses should be our No.1 priority.

U.S. Forces have now passe 3000 lives lost. It's time to pack it up & bring our troops home. Now.
Reply to this comment
by petersemkiw January 11, 2007 9:26 AM PST
Dear Katie,I think you and the CBS News Team are doing an excellent job in reporting the news!
Reply to this comment
by cmedina2-2009 January 11, 2007 9:37 AM PST
Katie Couric is this generation's model TV news anchor/personality.

Good reportage Katie!

CHRISTIAN MEDINA
Manila Philippines
Reply to this comment
by sjahaase January 11, 2007 11:54 AM PST
I want this question answered, what will happen if the Iraq government does not do what they said they will? We are paying with American lives! As a child I knew if I misbehaved there was a price to pay. That is what is missing from this new approach. The President said that they would loose the support of the American people, they have already lost that. He refused to say that we now send these 22,000 troops and if you do not do A & B then we will be gone, or what ever the plan is. Remember that last summer we sent 15.000 additional troops to Iraq on another failed promise. Here we are less than a year doing something now more publicized in the news. He had his own plan and did not consider the Iraq study group just as he did when he 1st invaded Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by stevehal007 January 11, 2007 8:19 PM PST
Well, now that a hand full of chosen CBS staffers have done their obligatory "lovefest praises for Katie and Bob", maybe we can hear from a more-and-more infrequent viewer of CBS Nightly News. Katie and Bob have done a great job....not of reporting objectively regarding the events in Iraq, but of carrying the liberal Democratic Party's water. Why don't we question why all of the major leaders within the Democrat party (Pelosi, Reid etal) have in the recent past (like, last month) said that they would support a short-term increase in the troop numbers to get a handle on sectarian violence so that the newly formed, democratically elected government in Iraq can get a grip on controlling their own destiny...but now, these same "put their finger in the political breeze & change their mind Democrat leaders are now opposed to the idea??? Seems like that would be a good news story. Oh, your report on the murder rate in New Orleans raises an interesting question...at the current rate of 5.6 homicides per 100,000 population nationaly, we experience roughly 16,800 murders in this country annually. That's 46 murders per day. Question: why don't you post the daily U.S. murder count along with the daily soldier fatalities??? Might keep things in perspective. We have lost over 70,000 of our people to needless murders compared to the noble loss of 3,000 honorable soldiers defending against a ruthless enemy.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented