• Home
  • Blogs
  • Public Eye
Public Eye
November 7, 2006 4:25 PM

'Late Term' Vs. 'Partial Birth'

Posted by Brian Montopoli
(AP)
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will be hearing the case of Gonzales v. Carhart, which is effectively a constitutional test of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. With the case approaching, CBS News Senior Vice President, Standards and Special Projects Linda Mason sent an email to the CBS News staff regarding the terms "late term abortion" and "partial birth abortion." Mason wrote that CBS News should use the term “late term abortion” when referring to the procedure in question, not "partial birth abortion." I asked her why.

"We thought that 'partial birth' is a color phrase for people who are anti-abortion rights," said Mason. "This is a procedure usually done after 20 weeks. Therefore, 'late term' is appropriate. Now, some colleagues have come back to me and questioned this because the name of the law before the Supreme Court is the 'Partial-Birth Abortion.' When people refer to the case, they should call it by the correct name. But a CBS reporter should call the procedure a 'late term abortion.'"
Tags:
abortion ,
partial birth ,
late term
Topics:
CBS News Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx

More From Public Eye

Add a Comment
by bmidji November 7, 2006 10:31 PM EST
CBS is actually a minute bit better on this topic. This, from 2003:

In an MRC study of 217 stories mentioning the issue of partial-birth abortion on ABC, CBS, and NBC, analysts found news reports explained the medical basics in only 18 of those stories, and 15 of those descriptions occurred before 1998. Including this week%u2019s debate, Big Three reporters have only described the procedure three times in the last five years %u2014 all of them on CBS. Even on June 28, 2000, when the Supreme Court overturned Nebraska%u2019s partial-birth ban, only CBS described the procedure in dispute. ABC and NBC have avoided it for five years.

http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/2003/fax20031027.asp
Reply to this comment
by bmidji November 7, 2006 9:25 PM EST
Brian, what Linda Mason is arguing for here is a term with LESS precision (and less emotion). A ban on the partial-birth procedure is NOT a ban on late-term abortions in general. So you're left with reporters saying "a certain type of late-term abortion procedure," and then reporters rarely actually explain the grisly particulars of the procedure.

The obvious question is that if CBS means to avoid "color phrases" from advocates, then will it stop using "affirmative action" instead of "racial quotas"? If CBS means to avoid partisan sounding bill titles, will it stop describing a bill by its title like the "Clean Air Act"? CBS seems to hate using "anti-abortion rights" terms because they oppose the "anti-abortion rights" movement.

Tim G.
Reply to this comment

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye