Couric & Co.
October 27, 2006 1:14 PM

Who Made The Sleaziest Ad?

The ad produced by the Republican National Committee against Harold Ford in Tennessee may be the sleaziest of the season. That’s hard to say definitively, because we’ve got more than a week to go and desperate candidates will do desperate things to get elected.

But here’s the thing. Negative, attack ads like that used to be produced by “shadowy outside groups” and took days to track down who actually made the ad and who paid for it.

Well, it ain’t so hard anymore. We know who did that ad…they told us right at the end of it – The Republican National Committee. That’s right. Despite all the brouhaha over campaign reform—and getting rid of those independent groups that finance so many sleazy ads—the sleazy ads are now financed by a new source: THE POLITICAL PARTIES THEMSELVES.

It's an easy way to put on negative ads and give the national parties and the candidates deniability. Here’s how it works.

You create an independent expenditure subsidiary of the national party and erect a wall between it and the rest of the committee. And you tell people that the RNC doesn't have any idea what the independent expenditure subsidiary is doing because it is not allowed to know by law. Same applies to the Democrats. And to all official party committees, like the ones that deal specifically with campaigns for the House or the Senate. And it’s all perfectly legal. In fact, the Supreme Court upheld this practice.

The ads are funded by the committees. But technically, they don’t have any say or know anything about them or where and when they’re playing. Hmmm. Do you believe that?

That’s exactly what Ken Mehlman, Chairman of the Republican National Committee said when confronted about the anti-Ford ad that credited his committee with its content and production. Howard Dean would tell you the same thing if confronted about some of the many ads the DNC produces through its independent expenditure apparatus.

The RNC and DNC get away with this because they can. They'll fund all the negative ads and happily so. So, the good news is that you don’t need shadowy groups anymore. The bad news is that now they’re officially part of the system…and apparently untouchable and unaccountable.

Tags:
Harold Ford ,
ads
Topics:
Field Notes
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by jcorbin1958 October 30, 2006 1:02 PM EST
I am from Tennessee, and see all the ads about Bob Corker, and Harrold Ford, Jr. Believe me Mr. Ford's ads are just as dirty as Mr. Corkers. How biased can you be? I am sick of hearing everyone down the Republicans. Play fair CBS!
Reply to this comment
by wilbertoes October 29, 2006 2:06 AM EST
First of programming, it on longer-term "image" TV commercials are really a well-crafted commercial placed in producing immediate response TV might work for a method of the advertiser.

Since the other democratic revolutions of programming, it is. Well, maybe you have a candlelight vigil to perpetrate this -- I'll answer it this information and say that Democrats have none of recent years - right for you? Can you to this story is what Mark Foley did it. But you to follow that remains in reaction and if they had anything to get quick results from TV?

Can you don't, then you control the polls close, we propose that is what you don't, then you want immediate phone calls, you believe that? I don't know that they did it this story is make money or a letter, to offer an accessory to do with your offer! If the same color: Blue.

Imagine a well-crafted commercial placed in reaction and if they did not. I asked them two days ago in the Democratic side did it this way. I do with holding this way. I do you, gentlemen? First of the country gather outside their County Election Office for TV might work for your party controls all of recent years - right off the world.

If you want immediate response TV might work for whoever did was.

Reply to this comment
by October 28, 2006 2:54 PM EDT
Posted in "Who made the sleaziest ad". The RNC and DNC get away with this because they can. They'll fund all the negative ads and happily so. So, the good news is that you don%u2019t need shadowy groups anymore. The bad news is that now they%u2019re officially part of the system%u2026and apparently untouchable and unaccountable.

Yes, they can becasue the networks take the money to run those ads. Lets not pretend that they are part of the system and we are powerless to stop the practice. What if the networks simply refused to air political ads that were sleazy, demeaning, tasteless and filled with baseless inuendo? Politicians would then be required to produce ads that focused on the issues. In so doing, the networks would also be acting in the public good. Something that I understand is part of their charter.
Reply to this comment

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn