Public Eye
June 20, 2006 10:19 AM

Rather Leaves CBS News

(CBS)
It's official: After 44 years, Dan Rather is leaving CBS News.

“With the utmost respect, we mark the extraordinary and singular role Dan has played in writing the script of not only CBS News, but of broadcast journalism," said Sean McManus, President, CBS News and Sports, in a press release. "There will always be a part of Dan Rather at CBS News. He is truly a ‘reporter’s reporter,’ and he has helped to train several generations of broadcast journalists. His legacy cannot be replicated.”

CBS has been criticized for the way it has handled Rather's departure, which first leaked with a Howard Kurtz story last Thursday that was sourced to "CBS executives." Jim Lehrer told Kurtz, "I think the man deserves better than this." Wrote David Blum: "it seems coldhearted and callous for CBS to cast Rather out so mercilessly, and so publicly, in the twilight of his career." An anonymous former CBS executive told Gail Shister that Rather's treatment has been "disgraceful. He's a legend. He gave his life to that company. Even though he made a big mistake, he did 43 years and 11 months' great work."

According to the release, "CBS News is currently finalizing plans for a primetime special on the newsman’s legendary career at CBS News." There will also be a story on Rather on tonight's "Evening News." The release, somewhat curiously, does not include a statement from Rather, who has already publicly commented about his departure.

It's important to remember that we don't know the backstory on how the Rather news first came out. Kurtz, in his "Media Notes Extra" column, noted Blum's piece, which suggested an organized leak on the part of CBS News, and suggested otherwise, writing: "sometimes stories aren't just handed to you." Rather had this season been a contributor to "60 Minutes," though with the arrival of contributors Anderson Cooper and Katie Couric, who join an already crowded group of correspondents, many of whom came over from the now canceled "60 Minutes II," there wasn't going to be a lot of space for him next season.

Rather is reportedly considering becoming host and producer of a weekly news program for high-definition television channel HDNet, which is owned by a company owned by Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban. The full CBS press release is after the jump.

UPDATE: According to Rather's assistant Kim Akhtar, Richard Leibner, Rather's agent, will be releasing a statement later today.

UPDATE 2:According to CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius, Rather was given the opportunity to comment in the release and chose not to do so.

UPDATE 3: McManus told the Los Angeles Times' Matea Gold: "We just couldn't come up with a schedule of assignments on '60 Minutes' that was satisfactory for both him and CBS. There's nothing disrespectful whatsoever in that we've tried to do this in a very fair and equitable way, knowing that we couldn't come to an agreement on a contract extension. It was an ongoing process that from our perspective was as cordial, lengthy and respectful as we could have made it."

---

June 20, 2006

DAN RATHER TO LEAVE CBS NEWS

Dan Rather will leave CBS News, it was announced by Sean McManus, President, CBS News and Sports.

“Of all the famous names associated with CBS News, the biggest and brightest on the marquee are Murrow, Cronkite and Rather,” said McManus. “With the utmost respect, we mark the extraordinary and singular role Dan has played in writing the script of not only CBS News, but of broadcast journalism. There will always be a part of Dan Rather at CBS News. He is truly a ‘reporter’s reporter,’ and he has helped to train several generations of broadcast journalists. His legacy cannot be replicated.”

“For more than four decades, Dan Rather has approached the job of broadcast journalist with a singular passion, dedication and, always, an unwavering desire to tell the story to the American public,” said Leslie Moonves, President and Chief Executive Officer, CBS Corp. “The unique mark he has left on his craft is indelible.”

CBS News is currently finalizing plans for a primetime special on the newsman’s legendary career at CBS News. It is scheduled to be broadcast sometime this fall. CBS News also will make a contribution to Rather’s alma mater, now called Sam Houston State University.

Rather, who joined CBS News in 1962, is one of a handful of individuals who, literally, have created and built the institution of broadcast journalism. He has covered virtually every major event in the world for CBS News in the past 44 years. His resume reads like a history book: from his early local reporting in Texas on Hurricane Carla to his unparalleled work for CBS News covering the assassination of President John F. Kennedy; the civil rights movement; the White House and national politics; wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, the Persian Gulf, Yugoslavia and Iraq. From his first days as the Associated Press reporter in Huntsville, Texas, in 1950, he more than earned his reputation as the “hardest working man in broadcast journalism.”

Rather regularly landed the biggest interviews with the world’s most important and compelling figures, from the famous to the infamous. His passion for the news, for getting the story and for taking on the most challenging assignments in journalism is unmatched—something his competitors knew only too well--and he has dedicated himself to delivering to the American public coverage that is fair and accurate, no matter the size and scope of the story. Rather has interviewed every United States president from Dwight D. Eisenhower to Bill Clinton and virtually every major international leader of the past 30 years. He landed two news-breaking interviews with Saddam Hussein. The first occurred in 1990 after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Then, in February 2003, with coalition forces poised to invade the country, Rather secured the most sought-after interview in the world, an exclusive one-on-one with Saddam in Baghdad, the first the Iraqi leader had conducted with a Western journalist since 1991. Rather and his team at 60 MINUTES II also broke, arguably, the biggest story of the year--the abuse of prisoners at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison--in April 2004.

Rather served as anchor and managing editor of the CBS EVENING NEWS from March 9, 1981 to March 9, 2005, the longest such tenure in broadcast journalism history. He anchored and reported for 48 HOURS from its premiere on Jan. 19, 1988, through September 2002. He was a correspondent for 60 MINUTES from October 1975 to September 1981, and again from March 2005 to the present. Rather served as a correspondent for 60 MINUTES II from its debut on Jan. 13, 1999, to its final edition in September 2005. His regular contributions to CBS News Radio included "Dan Rather Reporting," a weekday broadcast of news and analysis on the CBS Radio Network from March 1981 to November 2004.

During his four-plus decades with CBS News, Rather has held many other prestigious positions, including anchor of "CBS Reports" and of the weekend editions of the CBS EVENING NEWS. He served as the CBS News bureau chief in London and Saigon and was the White House correspondent during the Johnson and Nixon administrations.

He has received virtually every honor in broadcast journalism, including numerous Emmy Awards, a Peabody Award and citations from critical, scholarly, professional and charitable organizations.

In 1994, Rather was honored by his alma mater, Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, Texas, which named its journalism and communications building after him. On a more personal note, 1997 also saw the dedication of Rather's birthplace as part of the Wharton County Historical Museum.

Among the biggest highlights of his illustrious career was his critically acclaimed live reporting on the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Rather spent 53 hours and 35 minutes on the air over less than four days beginning the morning of the attacks. He anchored coverage in the studio and reported on the crisis from Ground Zero and then filed reports on the attack’s aftermath for 48 HOURS. He continued his coverage of the war on terror from datelines that included Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

In 2000, in addition to covering the Russian elections from Moscow and the peace process from Israel when they took a turn for the worse, Rather anchored Election Night 2000, a marathon that kept him on the air continuously from 6:00 PM on Tuesday, Nov. 7, to 10:00 AM on Wednesday, Nov. 8. During the time that the presidential race was undecided, Rather interviewed both candidates on how each felt about the stalemate in Florida. At the end of the year, Rather was the first anchor to be granted an exit interview with President Clinton as he prepared to leave the White House.

Rather was also the first to get an exclusive interview with President Clinton in March 1999 after the Monica Lewinsky scandal and Clinton’s impeachment by the House of Representatives; it was broadcast on 60 MINUTES II. It was one more first in a career punctuated by them. He was often the first of the U.S. news anchors to appear on the scene of major stories and did it once again that year when he was the first of the “big three” to report from Belgrade during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, filing stories for the CBS EVENING NEWS and other CBS News broadcasts. In addition to reporting on major events, including the Pope's visit to Cuba in January 1998, Rather was on the scene in New Orleans when Hurricane George struck the Gulf Coast in September that year.

Rather got down to even more familiar territory in 1997, when he conducted a rare interview with Horton Foote, a fellow Wharton, Texas native, for CBS NEWS SUNDAY MORNING and began a weekly syndicated newspaper column, reconnecting him to his roots as an Associated Press reporter in Huntsville, Texas, his first job in journalism. He also returned to China to report from Hong Kong as the British colony was formally turned over to Chinese rule. The trip included stops beforehand inside mainland China, recalling his earlier reporting there to cover events like the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy demonstrations and President Richard Nixon’s historic call on the Chinese leadership in 1972.

Rather made two trips to the front lines in Bosnia in 1995, reporting on American peacekeeping troops. He first reported from the region a quarter of a century earlier and has had unparalleled access to political and military leaders, as well as the innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. That October, Rather was literally once more in the eye of a storm, reporting on Hurricane Opal as it approached the Florida shore while two producers "anchored the anchor," clinging to his arms and legs during the ferociously high winds. That year, he reported on the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin from Jerusalem, was the only American anchor at Rabin's funeral, covered the 50th anniversary of V-E Day from London and made incisive contributions to four "CBS Reports" documentaries, including the multiple award-winning "In the Killing Fields of America."

In 1994, Rather reported from Eastern Europe on the rise of neo-fascism in the former Soviet Bloc, on the civil war in the Georgian Republic and on President Clinton's first Russian summit. He spent nearly a month in South Africa, covering that country's first attempt at true democracy and interviewing candidates of all the major parties in the elections. He went to the Middle East just before the Palestinians moved into Gaza and the West Bank, and conducted interviews with Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. His reporting from Haiti was memorable: he was the only network anchor on the scene before and during the crisis, and he obtained several exclusive interviews with Haiti's military leader, Lt. Gen. Raoul Cedras.

Rather is a prolific writer. He is the author of The American Dream (2001), Deadlines and Datelines (1999), The Camera Never Blinks Twice: The Further Adventures of a Television Journalist (1994), I Remember (1991), The Camera Never Blinks (1977) and The Palace Guard (1974). He also abridged Mark Sullivan's landmark popular history, Our Times: America at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century. He continues to be a much-sought-after contributor to many of the top newspapers and magazines in the country and speaks frequently on journalistic ethics.

Rather joined CBS News in 1962 as chief of its Southwest bureau in Dallas. In 1963, he was appointed chief of the Southern bureau in New Orleans, responsible for coverage of news events in the South, Southwest, Mexico and Central America. During that time, he reported on racial conflicts in the South and the crusade of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., as well as the death of President Kennedy. Rather began his career in journalism in 1950 as an Associated Press reporter in Huntsville, Texas. Later, he was a reporter for United Press International (1950-52), KSAM Radio in Huntsville (1950-53), KTRH Radio in Houston and the Houston Chronicle (1954-55). He became news director of KTRH in 1956 and a reporter for KTRK-TV Houston in 1959. Prior to joining CBS News, Rather was news director at KHOU-TV, the CBS affiliate in Houston.

He was born Oct. 31, 1931 in Wharton, Texas. In 1953, he received a bachelor's degree in journalism from Sam Houston State Teachers College (now Sam Houston State University), where he spent the following year as a journalism instructor. He also attended the University of Houston and the South Texas School of Law.
Tags:
Dan Rather
Topics:
CBS News Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
by steigejh June 22, 2006 10:37 AM EDT
Further comment to cathmurrell: I too am concerned about objectivity in media. At a critical point in a US presidential election, Rather rushed into action with a "scoop" based on an obviously fraudulent document. This is all described in excruciating detail in numerous places, including an official report. Dan thought he could swing the election. He hates Bush. He got caught. The assertion that the "gist" of the story might have been true is nonsense, another moveon.org fantasy. Bush did not try to avoid service in Vietnam, any more than tens of thousands of other veterans of that war did. Bush served, and, in case you don't know it, piloting a jet plane is actually hazardous. At the time he was allegedly trying to avoid service, the air force was downsizing and Bush couldn't have gotten to Vietnam under any circumstances. Again, all the lies Rather and others tried to promulgate have been thoroughly debunked at numerous blogsites. Try www.powerline.blog, for example. As for the notion that Bush "lied" to get us into war, this too has been thoroughly debunked so many times that your repeating it simply indicates an unwillingness to face the truth. Bush may indeed have relayed debatable facts based on intelligence information he and others were given. This is different from "lying." Actually WMDs have been found. They did exist. Try reading today's news. It says that declassified memos now reveal that over 500 chemical weapons have been found in Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by cathmurrell June 21, 2006 2:48 AM EDT
A few comments and questions inspired by steigejh's post. First of all, the objectivity of the media isn't a liberal issue or a conservative issue. It's a truth issue. And nothing in your response besides the vague assertion that Bush's National Guard Duty was more honorable than so and so's even addresses the main issue - whether the gist of the story Rather reported was or was not true given the preponderous of the evidence - and one faked document that a journalist has been misled into believing to be real does not magically erase all the other evidence. While the real matter isn't whether or not Bush's service was more or less honorable's than other peoples - if you want to play the comparison game you might want to start with someone who was actually running against Bush - like John Kerry. I'm more interested in whether Bush fulfilled his responsibilities or not. That's a fair question to ask of a candidate who sends thousands of young people overseas to risk their lives. The bottom line, steigejh, is that we and countless other Americans can waste time and energy that's greatly needed elsewhere in throwing around "liberal" vs. "conservative" labels. This isn't about Bush and Clinton or Kerry or any other one figure. This is about whether or not the news gives us all the information we need in order to make our own rational judgments - and generally the news doesn't - whether it's about Bush's service record or whether or not he lied to get us into war.
Reply to this comment
by jimgee1 June 20, 2006 10:09 PM EDT
I have mixed feelings about Dan. The man cares deeply, that's undeniable. But he's been kind of a walking embarrassment in some ways for CBS for years. He's an exhausting personality, spontaneous and contrived all at once. I was almost pulled apart during the 'Courage' signoff days. Like the CBS execs I thought, "What in tarnation is this guy saying?". But In another way it was quite moving. I imagined some guy recently diagnosed with cancer or some young mother who'd just lost a pregnancy staring at the Evening News trying to get their minds off things, and the man says simply: "Courage". It must have been like it was aimed right at you, a voice from beyond who recognized your suffering and gently urged you to put that chin up and meet the next day with strength and hope... Could Brokaw or Jennings do that? No way on Brokaw. Jennings, perhaps... In any event, it would have been better for Dan to move on right after losing the anchor chair. Maybe CBS was hoping it would occur to him on its own. When it became clear he was going to stick it out, what else could they do but downsize him until he got the message? Hey, our generation basked in the sun plennnnty long. Couric , Cooper, Brian Williams, Bob Woodruff (he'll be back).. it's their time now. We might resent being "put out to pasture", but some cultures did a lot worse by their elders. Energetic people like Dan have a hard time understanding they're old. Doesn't change the fact of the matter.
Reply to this comment
by aks644 June 20, 2006 9:35 PM EDT
In looking at the totality of Dan Rather's distinguished and lengthy career (at CBS), it is absolutely appalling the manner in which CBS has handled Mr. Rather's exit after his decades of service. It is beyond tacky and classless to attack Mr. Rather on CBS' own website. He deserves better than that. You have lost a loyal viewer in your coveted demographic. Best wishes to you Mr. Rather.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver June 20, 2006 8:33 PM EDT
Why are most people suprised at the way CBS treated Dan Rather? Starting with Ed Murrow it seems to be the disgraceful way they treat everyone who tried to make CBS what it could have been and never will be. Did anyone notice Sean McManus forgot Douglass Edwards altogether? It seems they ask everyday "hey Murrow,Edwards,Kronkite,Rather, we know what you did for us yesterday, what did you do for us today?" McManus is going to find out that all that glitters is not ratings GOLD. He is also going to find,"what goes around comes around". Good Luck Dan!!
Reply to this comment
by jimlocke1 June 20, 2006 7:21 PM EDT
Perhaps the rest of CBS will take note of the changes in news coverage over the last decade. You're actually alienating those you 'need' with slanted coverage, so keep up the good work. Oh, yeah... good-bye, Dan.
Reply to this comment
by bdfriedman0 June 20, 2006 7:15 PM EDT
You had to see this coming. This is exactly what CBS did to Walter Cronkite. He was told that he would continue to have a substantial role at CBS News even if he gave up the anchor chair, which he did. And then, he found himself being treated as a pariah when he would come to work. Cronkite finally resigned himself to reality, and stopped coming to work. If CBS News can do this to Cronkite--who, in my opinion, is the giant of television news--it can do it to anybody. Now, CBS News has done it to Dan Rather.
Reply to this comment
by daval2 June 20, 2006 7:06 PM EDT
The once mighty and respected organization called CBS News has done it again. They've taken one of their own who has given his professional life to the network and thrown them to the wolves. First it was Edward R. Murrow who, after he told the truth about the TV industry in 1958, was basically blacklisted at CBS as a traitor and left two years later. Later when Walter Cronkite prematurely stepped down from the anchor chair in 1981 to make way for Dan Rather, he too was put out to pasture even though hw wanted to continue on-air at CBS. In 1998, when John Glenn returned to space after 36 years, Cronkite was hired by CNN to co-anchor its coverage. CBS had a quick talking head and that was it. And now, after 24 years as anchor and a long career with CBS News, the network is giving Rather the royal shaft. They want to be rid of him and focus on the impending arrival of Katie Couric. Sorry folks...but I've been a loyal CBS News viewer since Cronkite in the 60s when I was a kid. I'm leaving and switching to Brian Williams and NBC. CBS News is not even a shadow of what it used to be. Shame on you!
Reply to this comment
by dustinbarnes June 20, 2006 7:00 PM EDT
I grew up on CBS. Because of Dan Rather, I have always wanted to be a news anchor. His style of words and his poise has always been an admiration. He IS and ALWAYS WILL BE MY ROLE MODEL. Everyone who knows me knows that I am a Dan Rather fan. I even get called Dan Rather sometimes. He is not only a great loss to CBS, but an horrific loss to the journalistic society. I hate that he had to leave, but Dan Rather is the type who just can't sit down. He has to be doing something, and since CBS didn't give him anything to do, he had to go. I am a student at Grambling State University in Louisiana, majoring in broadcasting, and I graduate in May. As I look toward beginning my reporting career, I just think about how would Dan do it. He is truly an icon in my heart, and I'll never, ever forget him. Oh, how I would love to meet him, and just have "A Day with Dan." That would make all the difference. Best wishes, Dan. I'll be watching for you.
Reply to this comment
by mwalkercook June 20, 2006 6:59 PM EDT
This is a sad day for the American public and for American broadcasting. While NBC and ABC chose the high road of showing such respect, honor and fidelity to Mssrs. Brokaw and Jennings, CBS has chosen the worst kind of public display for Mr. Rather. My family are all active duty military or retired. Mr. Rather interviewed my father, a former USAF fighter pilot during the Vietnam offensive and he was a brave reporter in the face of adverse reporting circumstances. He never fails to ask the difficult question, the important question, the question most never have the courage or character to ask out loud. And he does not relent until the interviewee gives an appropriate response that is in keeping with what the American and world viewers expect in such important settings. CBS corporate, CBS news, our family which comprises over 178 members will never grace your programming again. We are aware that you are so much more than just CBS TV, Showtime, etc. We will boycott you from this point forward until you APOLOGIZE to Mr. Rather and to his loyal viewers because no Katie Couric cookie cut-out will ever preempt a man who devoted 44 years of hard reporting and extensive decorated published works for you. Shame on you CBS. You deserve to be last in any ratings! Mr. Rather, we shall listen to you wherever you land, let us know where!
Reply to this comment
by brian5064 June 20, 2006 6:30 PM EDT
Dan Rather used to drive me crazy sometimes. His "Ratherisms" during a nerve racking yet chaotic election night would make me laugh, yet I also felt compelled to smash the TV! In all seriousness, this is a sad day for the enterprise of journalism and for CBS News. I'm afraid this is another step on the Moonves/McManus road to making the news more "entertaining" and devoid of substance. I've watched the CBS Evening News and other CBS News programing since I was a child. Despite his flaws, you always knew that Rather would give the viewers an honest effort to tell them the relevant news of the day. CBS can have it's fluffy "Assignment America" stories back. Give me back the hard hitting newscast I grew up with in the 80's that covered the world. I'll stick with CBS for now because Bob Schieffer is still one of the best, but I fear for the future of CBS News. It's in dangerous hands now. I wish Mr. Rather the best of luck.
Reply to this comment
by steigejh June 20, 2006 6:29 PM EDT
People like "cathmurrell" frantically try to rewrite history regarding the abject career of Dan Rather. Rather has been making serious mistakes for decades. I remember when he did a radio commentary on the Zapruder film and informed the viewers how Kennedy's head "snapped forward," when the film showed it snapping back. Real convenient for LBJ and Dan's career. RatherGate turned into a scandal when the arrogant Rather tried to stonewall an obvious error. The original error, occurring in the midst of a Presidential election, was unforgiveable. Rather apparently still thought he was living in the 1980's, when the strict liberal control of the media could drown out the truth. He thought nobody would know! Poor Dumb Dan. Even now, he appears at festivities like the Emmy Awards, where brainless Hollywood elites give him standing ovations, and Rather responds by getting teary and giving eulogies to his own shabby career. Sorry Dan, and sorry Cathmurrell. You made your bed, and now you'll lie in it. And, by the way, cathmurrell --- Bush's National Guard Service was vastly more honorable, and more dangerous, than that performed by tens of thousands of young Americans during that period. Where was Bill Bradley? Where was Bill Clinton? I rest my case.
Reply to this comment
by illumen8 June 20, 2006 6:29 PM EDT
It is with disappointment and disgust that I read the news of the marginalizing and forced exit of Dan Rather from not only CBS News, but from 60 Minutes in particular. To replace a journalist of his stature with the current pop stars of entertainment reporting, Katie Couric and Anderson Cooper, is a sad testament to the deterioration of what was once the flagship of responsible reporting in America. Whatever the internal politics are of the 60 Minutes production, however egos might have collided and with whom, more respect should be afforded for not only Dan Rather, but for the legacy of what he represents in the history of television news. I certainly hope that a public show of support for your colleague is being prepared for your audience. Although I would like to see Ed Bradley, Leslie Stahl, Steve Kroft, Morley Safer, Bob Simon, Andy Rooney, et al walk off the show in protest, that kind of courage has all but left the arena of news reporting in this country. Instead of the allegiance to the Fourth Estate, allegiance has become more to the corporations that own "the news", the advertisers that own the corporations and the old political guard that dictates that news in the first place and who they deem safe enough to report it. Except for perhaps the unbridled frontier of the blogosphere, what has the Fourth Estate become after all in the age of the "(im)moral majority", but the State itself. Edward R. Murrow must be rolling in his grave.
Reply to this comment
by Rockboy106 June 20, 2006 6:22 PM EDT
Good riddance Dan!! One of the worst sins any journalist or newsperson can commit is losing their objectivity and not presenting a fair and balanced story. CBS News always had a political agenda and was "rather biased" because of Dan. It is not surprising that in his fervor to get revenge on George Bush, he fell flat on his face, thus deserving the the cold send-off he is getting. Dan's ego and political agenda came before all else and was more important for him to get his version of the story out, rather than for the story to get accurate. Because of Dan, I switched to ABC World News Tonight with Peter Jennings a long time ago. His tirades and over the top drama was just too much for me. I hope that future journalists will learn from his many mistakes. He never was, nor will he ever be, on the same scale as Walter Cronkite (the most trusted man in America). Dan was more like the most mistrusted man in America. Goodbye and good riddance.
Reply to this comment
by rochester_ny June 20, 2006 6:03 PM EDT
Many people have strong opinions of Dan Rather, but I was surprised that there is a "weird comments by Dan Rather" web site out there. I found it when I was trying to recall the bizarre story about Dan Rather where someone kept asking him "What's the frequency, Kenneth". I found the site with a Google search for What is the Frequency Dan Rather. The unfortunate journalistic incidents with both the elder and younger Presidents Bush may have made people forget the other things that have happened to Mr. Rather! http://www.ratherbiased.com/bizarre.htm#weirdStatements This web site says the rock band R.E.M. even made a song after the "frequency" incident, a song called "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?". They also say that Dan Rather later appeared onstage with R.E.M. on CBS's The Late Show with David Letterman. What an interesting career Mr Rather has had !
Reply to this comment
by nunuvyer June 20, 2006 5:22 PM EDT
There was nothing brave about Rather (and Mapes) putting fake documents on the air. They were shooting for the big target and the gun backfired - that's the risk they took by going on the air with such flimsy proof - photocopies of faxed documents provided by a partisan nutcase without provenance. They WANTED to believe that the documents were real and ignored all evidence to the contrary, though there was plenty of reason to be suspicious. The idea that the documents were some kind of Karl Rovian plant, while amusing, is totally without foundation, but it might as well be true given how badly their effort to "help" Kerry backfired not only on them but on their favored candidate as well (and who doesn't think that Rather and Mapes voted for Kerry?). As bad as their original sin was the refusal to back away after it became obvious to everyone but them how obviously fake the documents were. Rather could have perhaps salvaged his career with an abject apology but he was too proud to admit that he had been fooled because he wanted to be fooled.
Reply to this comment
by cathmurrell June 20, 2006 5:01 PM EDT
Dan Rather has much to be proud of - and CBS much to be ashamed of. Rather's much publicized fall from grace was the result of nothing more than a good reporter being misled by a source into believing the authenticity of a fake document. That's a risk faced by any reporter who is actually doing his or her job and going forth bravely into the terrain where mainstream media fears to tread. Examining all the other, authenticated data pointing towards a shameful Bush service record - including the black lines crossing out much of the information on official documents (who knew that the service records of an individual who didn't even make it overseas could contain so much sensitive information?) - a reasonable observer might wonder if Rather were purposefully fed a fake document by Bush supporters fearful of the impact of Rather's reporting on the issue. Regardless, I have to question the credibility of a news organization that overreacts to an honest error while paying so very little attention to the deliberate lies and deception emanating from the most powerful office in the world today. If CBS applied the same standards to the Bush administration as it has to Dan Rather, the network would have come out loudly and emphatically in favor of impeachment years ago.
Reply to this comment
by roger6895 June 20, 2006 4:52 PM EDT
After never accepting responsibility for the fake documents fiasco, I think this a fitting send off to a hack journalist who was more concerned with being first than with being right.
Reply to this comment
by sanfelz June 20, 2006 4:43 PM EDT
Dan Rather could give a revealing interview to John Roberts or Howard Stern and scoop CBS on its own story and increase the ratings of two former CBS stars. I speculate on how a young Dan Rather would report on the war in Iraq. My guess is that he would refuse to be embedded Dan Rather was unafraid to ask the inconvenient unanswered questions about Iran-Contra that Daddy Bush still has not answered.
Reply to this comment
by CBSTV June 20, 2006 4:28 PM EDT
I feel that Dan Rather was miscast as an anchorman. He is a reporter, and an outstanding one at that. The undignified treatment that CBS News afforded Mr. Rather after he stepped down from "The CBS Evening News" is indeed a disgrace. I suspect that corporate CEO Les Moonves is a major factor in this. This serves as another example of why the News Division ought function independently from the rest of CBS. Whether intentional or not, here is the message that Messrs. Moonves and McManus are sending to journalists both inside and outside CBS News: You can crawl on your stomach through the jungles of Viet Nam with bullets flying over your head, devote your life and soul to a company for 44 years, be on call 24 hours a day to go anywhere in the world where important news is happening, and at the end of the day, we'll let you twist in the wind. This is an ignominious conclusion to a remarkable career.
Reply to this comment
See all 32 Comments

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye