A Story Slipping Away?

(AP / CBS)
This afternoon, Verizon became the second of three companies identified in the USA Today story to deny having provided bulk customer information to the NSA. To backtrack a moment, the USA Today story claimed that Verizon, BellSouth and AT&T had entered into a contract with the NSA in the aftermath of 9/11 to provide data on its customers. According to the paper, the NSA “has been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans” under the program and one source was quoted calling it the “largest database ever assembled in the world.” The database, reportedly only consisting of phone numbers, are analyzed to detect “calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity.”
Now, however, both Verizon and BellSouth are denying having been asked or having provided such information to the NSA. A statement from Verizon this afternoon stated, “contrary to the media reports, Verizon was not asked by NSA to provide, nor did Verizon provide, customer phone records.” Similarly, BellSouth yesterday said “that it never gave the NSA that information, nor was it ever asked by the NSA to provide that information.” So far, no comment from AT&T, but there appears enough here to start wondering about the accuracy of the original USA Today story.
It is curious that these two companies took several days to issue these denials (the story broke last Thursday and the companies did not deny it then). A BellSouth spokesperson said the company wanted to do a thorough review to ensure that no such agreement had been made. It’s also worth considering there have been several class-action lawsuits filed in the wake of the USA Today story, so that could have something to do with the denials.
Still, we’re entering some rocky territory, especially for a story about a “secret” program based entirely on anonymous sources. Given the administration’s refusal to confirm or deny the report, the company denials and the anonymous sources, it may be time to ask how we’ll ever get the truth out of this story.
-
by ragweed42
May 19, 2006 10:57 AM PDT
- Two companies PR departments and lawyers craft denials and the story is going away? Since when has the "nothing to see here, please move on" response been meaningful, much less cause for a journalist to abort their inquiry.
I'd point out that BellSouth and Verizon did not originally deny the story. They only did so after lawsuits were filed. AT&T didn't bother because an insider turned over physical evidence (and the judge denied a motion to exclude it). The ex CEO of Qwest has no personal interest and he still sticks to his story.
And what if you read the statements from Verizon and BellSouth? They don't deny what USA Today said, only the implication that the companies don't value privacy or that "contracts" or "billing records" were involved.
And what incentive do those companies have not to lie? How about Verizon, their denial has at least one clear falsehood: they don't keep records of local calls (in fact, they do -- ask someone with a copy of a Verizon EODUF). It may not appear on your bill -- but that's because it's an internal record, not a "customer record", intended for CLECs and such.
No. The story isn't dead. Vever's attention span might be spent, but that's about it.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 11 Comments