Public Eye
September 16, 2005 12:45 PM

Stringers In Tight Places

Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal and New York Times told the story of Abdul Ameer Younis Hussein, an Iraqi cameraman for CBS News, who has been detained by the U.S. military "for alleged insurgent activity." Hussein had been shot in the thigh by an American sniper while filming in Mosul after a suicide bombing and was taken into custody while recovering.

As the Wall Street Journal notes in a correction to its original story, CBS "hasn't taken the position that it knows" Hussein is innocent. But the network has argued that the U.S. government has not made evidence available of his guilt.

For us, the situation has illuminated the unique challenges faced by Iraqis employed by foreign news organizations.

Western media organizations say their Iraqi employees are regularly detained by the U.S. military for reasons that are unclear. Iraqi employees of CNN, Associated Press Television News, and Agence France-Presse, and Reuters have been detailed for extended periods, and three of the Reuters employees claimed after their release that they were abused by American interrogators. According to the New York Times, American commanders believe that Iraqi reporters who arrive at the scene of an attack too quickly likely have ties to insurgents; their advocates counter that the Iraqi reporters and cameramen are often merely acting on tips.

PE talked with Randall Joyce, a London-based producer for CBS News who is acting Baghdad bureau chief, about the challenges facing CBS News' Iraqi employees, and the reasons the network uses them.

(CBS)

"There are a lot of places where it is easier for an Iraqi to go, because of the security situation here," Joyce says. "It's always an issue at this point when foreigners – especially Americans or British people, but basically any foreigners at this point – go on the road and go out and travel around. It's no big secret that the insurgents have a technique of kidnapping foreigners and holding them for ransom or killing them."

But the Iraqi employees, he says, have to take care not to let people know exactly what they're up to. "We're always worried that the Iraqis working for us are at a greater risk, especially because they are working for an American television network. A lot of the people who work for us have to be very quiet about who they work for, because the insurgents make no difference between working for an American news organization and working for what they consider to be the American occupation."

We've posted a six-minute audiofile of our interview with Joyce, who spoke to us from Baghdad. You can listen to it here.
Tags:
Randall Joyce ,
Iraq ,
CBS cameraman ,
Abdul Ameer Younis Hussein
Topics:
Media Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by tomgrey2 September 17, 2005 11:01 PM EDT
It seems that the insurgents understand info management -- and kill the reporters who don\'t put out the anti-Bush propaganda they want. Is that what is going on? Is this part of a future terrorist success, much like the N. Vietnamese were successful?
Reply to this comment
by sacralvoice September 17, 2005 3:16 AM EDT
Tonight on Bill Mayer one of his guests was saying that 35% sitting in the Iraqi congress are women as well as many other good things that are happening there. Why not start broadcasting that rather than the latest bombing or attack. When I heard this guy talking, I wanted to know more.
Reply to this comment
by neuro-con September 17, 2005 2:50 AM EDT
There are two key ingredients to successful terrorism: 1) the explosion itself, which is propaganda-of-the-deed, and 2) someone able to capture this propaganda on film and willing to broadcast it to the world, to instill fear and despair. As documented by the Belmont Club, there have been far too many instances of Iraqi \"stringers\" actually being key enemy operatives. CBS and other American MSM have not taken this at all seriously.
Reply to this comment
by tomgrey2 September 16, 2005 6:58 PM EDT
Where\'s the background note of the Iraqi cameraman whose camera, when captured, was full of film of successful terrorist attacks? i.e. he was a terrorist (recruiter?) cameraman? Why aren\'t there more fotos of schools & hospitals that have been refurbished? Aren\'t they any facts about that? (Public Eye seems a great idea)
Reply to this comment
by sacralvoice September 16, 2005 5:19 PM EDT
The Iraqi employee ventures out unaccompanied by an American representative of CBS while trying to hide the fact that they work for CBS. This person will always appear suspicious. Hence the army detains them. No matter how much I oppose this war, our troops are still there and I want them to be safe. The only solution is to have an American employee of CBS partner them at all times. If it is too dangerous for that, then pull out of the coverage. Drastic move? Maybe. One never knows.
Reply to this comment
by nylawyer2 September 16, 2005 3:55 PM EDT
I\'m glad to see that the Wall Street Journal told the story of CBS News\' cameraman who has been taken by the american military in Iraq. But I wonder why no CBS news broadcast (so far as I can tell) has covered this story. I\'d be interested to hear a response from CBS News. Thanks--
Reply to this comment

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye