CBS News/ May 23, 2011, 9:31 AM

Lance Armstrong blasts CBS' "60 Minutes" report

Lance Armstrong, who declined to be interviewed by "60 Minutes" for an explosive report Sunday night, has posted a statement on his publicist's website, facts4lance.com, in response to the doping allegations made by fellow cyclists Tyler Hamilton and George Hincapie.

In part, it says, "CBS's reporting on this subject has been replete with broken promises, false assurances and selective reliance on witnesses upon whom no reputable journalist would rely."

The response comes after the "60 Minutes" report seemed to dismantle Armstrong's inspiring story.

On "The Early Show" Monday, CBS News Chief Investigative Correspondent Armen Keteyian said Armstrong's life story is one for the ages -- he survived a lethal form of cancer to go on and win the world's most grueling bike race a record seven straight times, never once, Armtrong claims, resorting to illegal drugs that infected his sport.

But on Sunday night, Armstrong's inspiring story appeared to come crashing down.

The "60 Minutes" investigation reconfigured Armstrong's iconic image from American hero into, allegedly, a secretive, systematic user of performance-enhancing drugs, including the blood-boosting drug EPO.

Correspondent Scott Pelley's two-part report was built around the eyewitness account of Tyler Hamilton, Armstrong's top lieutenant for the first three of his seven Tour de France victories.

Pelley asked, "You saw Lance Armstrong inject EPO?"

Hamilton replied, "Yeah, like we all did, like I did many, many times."

Pelley reported, "Tyler Hamilton always denied doping until this moment. He's an Olympic gold medalist who kept the secrets of his sport for 14 years. He refused to cooperate with the federal investigation of Armstrong. But in June, he was served a subpoena which forced him to testify before the grand jury."

Pelley asked Hamilton, "Tell me what you saw in terms of what Lance Armstrong took in performance-enhancing drugs?"

Hamilton responded, "He took what we all took, really no difference between Lance Armstrong and I'd say the majority of the peloton, you know. There was EPO, there was testosterone. And I did see a transfusion, a blood transfusion."

As part of "60 Minutes"' six-month investigation, Pelley broke the news that George Hincapie, Armstrong's closest, most trusted teammate for all his Tour wins, had broken his silence, as well.

Pelley reported, "Now we are told that Hincapie, for the first time, has told federal investigators that he and Armstrong supplied each other with the blood-booster EPO and discussed having used testosterone - another banned substance during their preparation for races."

Keteyian said on "The Early Show" it was all part of what Hamilton portrayed as a cycle of deception -- complete with code words and secret cell phones.

Hamilton told Pelley that Armstrong had a secret phone.

Before the story was over, the "60 Minutes" report also appeared to put an end to Armstrong's most powerful defense: that he's never failed a drug test.

Hamilton told Pelley, "I know he's had a positive test before."

Hamilton said Armstrong tested positive for EPO at the Tour of Switzerland in 2001. When Pelley asked him how he knew of the positive test, Hamilton replied, "He told me."

On "The Early Show" Monday, Bill Strickland, editor at large of Bicycling magazine, said he has evidence that Armstrong had used drugs.

He told co-anchor Chris Wragge, "I wrote a story in May for Bicycling ... that said I thought he was guilty, I knew he had doped. In the course of investigating around him, I finally found the conviction. So I've known for awhile. This is just inevitable, I think."

Strickland, who had unique access to Armstrong's circle for Armstrong's 2009 comeback tour, said he was told by Armstrong himself point-blank that he didn't use performance-enhancing substances.

"He looked me in the eyes and said, 'I'm looking you in the eyes and telling you no.' We were on a bike ride. Very powerful when he looks directly at you and he says that."

"And you believed him?" Wragge asked.

Strickland said, "I did."

As for the "60 Minutes" report, Strickland said it's "pretty damaging" to Armstrong that each of these cyclists is corroborating the others. Strickland referred to biker Floyd Landis' claims in recent years that Armstrong had used performance-enhancing drugs.

He said, "It certainly, the fact that Tyler is corroborating Floyd (Landis) -- both of them independently have some credibility problems -- (but) the fact that they're both saying the same thing is pretty damaging to Lance. The news about George Hincapie is probably more damaging than Tyler."

Wragge remarked, "We also heard from Frankie Andreu that he noticed teammates in the Armstrong era all getting faster. It was very, very difficult to compete with competitors who were (allegedly) using EPO, and other performance-enhancing drugs. Was it one of those elements where you just did (it), in order to keep up, you've got to shoot up - that type of mentality?"

Strickland said, "The best that could be said of him: He was the champion of a dirty era. We looked at the top 10 finishers of all seven tours he won - 41 out of 70 have been convicted of doping, confessed to doping. Just an era filthy with dope."

Wragge asked, "Do you think this is strong enough that Lance Armstrong finally has to go the route of like a Mark McGuire or other famous steroid users like an A-Rod and come out and say, 'You know what, I did do it?' Or does it continue to go down the line of a Roger Clemens who vehemently denies any type of performance-enhancing drugs no matter how concrete the evidence may be?"

"Lance is a fighter," Strickland said. "He's going to go all the way. I know he thinks he won't be indicted. I tend to think that, as well. A lot of people out there - he has a big fan base, a lot of people on his side. I don't think he's going to confess."

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
19 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pathamilton1236 says:
What about Contador he tested positive and is still riding. 60 minutes where is that story? Guess it is to factual for your liking. Go do some good reporting for a change or are you capable of that?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pathamilton1236 says:
Funny how 60 minutes says George Hincape said Armstrong used drugs when George never spoke with 60 minutes. first off the testimony before the grand jury has not been released, so how does CBS know what George said? Just another smear campaign by CBS and shoddy reporting. Just like after hurricane katrina the report they did was so inaccurate. I say get your facts right or shut up.
reply
pathamilton1236 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
From George himself " I have never spoken to 60 minutes"
linkicon reporticon emailicon
incog-nito says:
It will come down to Armstrong and his allies' words against the accusers' words. Unless there's a huge bombshell such as new test data, the prosecutors are grasping at straws. The verdict will be a farce just like the Barry Bonds trial.

But "victory" is not really their goal. Their goal is to stretch the investigation as long as possible and rack up tens of millions of dollars in billable fees, courtesy of the American taxpayer. Just like "Whitewater" other investigations of this kind, they take on a life of their own and change direction as needed in order to alive as long as possible.

Their goal is not justice, or even to clean up the sport. Only better testing can clean up the sport. Their goal is self-enrichment, pure and simple
reply
lovetoride2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
you are an idiot. Federal investigators and prosecutors don't earn billable fees, they are paid a salary for doing their jobs. Lance's defense lawyers are the ones who'll make lots of money trying to obfuscate the truth.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
twclarke39 says:
Why are such large government resources being thrown at something that happened 10 years ago in Europe...from an investigation in California? Have you heard of statute of limitations...have you heard of jurisdiction. Oh, that's right. It's the same agent and prosecutor as in the BALCO case. So who has the large EGO? Which one of you "leaked" grand jury information about Hincapie testimony and other details? I do know of at least one crime that was committed....and it committed by someone from the government.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ridestrong says:
If you cheat, you lose. If you lie under oath, you go to prison.
reply
cubbyjimmy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OK, Barry Bonds.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So_Brazen says:
I couldn't believe what I was seeing from Tour of California pictures my Dad sent me from the final Thousand Oaks stage. Barry Friggen Bonds, Novitzy's former nemesis, enjoying a sunny day of bike racing action. I posted the pics on my blog.

http://brazencycleworks.blogspot.com/2011/05/amgen-tour-of-california-attracts.html
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,

le dopage dans le sport c'est une r?alit?,
mais alors qu'en est-il de ces contr?les antidopage subis par les athl?tes dans toutes les disciplines,
si les les athl?tes dop?s reussissent ? d?tourner ces tests,
est-ce ? cause du manque de la fiabilit? de ces tests, ou il s'agit de complicit?

...........

the doping in sport is a reality,
but then what about these doping controls sustained by athletes in all disciplines,
if the doped athletes managed to divert these tests,
Is it because of lack of reliability of these tests, or it is is complicity
"Tyler Hamilton" has been silent for years,
for confess now, why?
This also called "complicity" or the "fear"
"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ridestrong says:
I know Frankie Andreu and Tyler Hamilton well. I know George Hincape fairly well. If they ALL testified UNDER OATH to a Grand Jury that he used EPO and Testosterone, then it is a fact! No sour grapes. Just the facts of a real loser coming out FINALLY! And the problem is that he testified UNDER OATH that he NEVER used ANYTHING and intimidated witnesses. I know that for a fact. I know him well.
reply
betterusa replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I know the CEOs of the 4 major oil companies well. I know the CEO of the fifth major oil company fairly well. If they ALL testified UNDER OATH to a Grand Jury that they have no control over raising oil prices and there is a shortage, then it is a fact! No idea why they are getting record profits. I know that for a fact. I know them well.

This shows how much your BS statement really means - I bet Lance beat your azz in a race.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ridestrong says:
I know Frankie Andreu and Tyler Hamilton well. I know George Hincape fairly well. If they ALL testified UNDER OATH to a Grand Jury that he used EPO and Testosterone, then it is a fact! No sour grapes. Just the facts of a real loser coming out FINALLY! And the problem is that he testified UNDER OATH that he NEVER used ANYTHING and intimidated witnesses. I know that for a fact. I know him well.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bkrman says:
Yeah, leave the poor guy alone! Who cares if he cheated? Everybody does it and those who don't must just be suckers or French. So I say they get what they deserve.
And look at all of the great advances in medicine! They are like human Formula One cars and doing our testing for us. So what that several Dutch cyclists in the 90's died while taking EPO or that some Italian named Marco Pantani or a Belgian named Frank Vandenbrouke(sp?) moved on to harder drugs and overall depression and even suicide. That's just sour grapes, dude. Buck up!
I tell you, I would rather live like Lyle Alzedo and be a glorified gladiator who gets whatever he wants for years and then happily "catches" cancer and dies at a far early age than live out my normal life. What a deal! It's like Logan's Run or the Running Man but real! We have real life gladiators who sacrifice their bodies and their potential longevity for our entertainment and to win. That's America, baby! Just win! All the others are suckers.
Oh, but don't let me get burned by that cheating attitude, dude. All those Enron and Wall Street types are crooks! Who told them it was ok to take what they want and cheat me out of my money! Nobody, that's who! That's why I say they should get away with it too! It's all a game, man! If you don't get yours then you just don't know how to play!
reply
See all 19 Comments