Obama mocks GOP, jokes they want border moat
Obama discusses immigration reform in El Paso, Texas, May 10, 2011.
Delving anew into an explosive issue, President Barack Obama stood near the border with Mexico on Tuesday and declared it more secure than ever, trying to build pressure on Republicans to take on a comprehensive immigration overhaul -- and eagerly working to show vital Hispanic voters that he is not the one standing in the way.
Countering Republican calls to focus on border security before moving to a comprehensive overhaul, Obama said their demands have been more than met by his administration but "they'll never be satisfied."
On his first trip to the U.S.-Mexico border since becoming president, Obama boasted of increasing border patrol agents, nearing completion of a border fence, and screening more cargo.
"We have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement," Obama said. "But even though we've answered these concerns, I gotta say I suspect there are still going to be some who are trying to move the goal posts on us one more time."
"Maybe they'll need a moat," Obama said mockingly to laughter from the crowd. "Maybe they'll want alligators in the moat."
Trying to build public support for legislation congressional Republicans don't want to pass, Obama said: "The question is whether those in Congress who previously walked away in the name of enforcement are now ready to come back to the table and finish the work we've started."
Obama also tailored his argument to the times, making his case for immigration reform in newly sharpened economic terms. He argued that the middle class would benefit from bringing illegal immigrants out of an underground economy and drawing on the abilities of immigrants educated in American universities.
Republicans disputed Obama's contention that the border has been effectively secured and accused him of playing politics in pursuit of the ever-growing Hispanic electorate ahead of the 2012 election. With Republicans in control of the House there's no longer any appetite on Capitol Hill for the comprehensive legislation Obama wants that would offer a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country.
"The president's off talking about comprehensive reform. We've been down that road before," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., told reporters on Capitol Hill. "I believe, in turn, we should do things that actually produce some progress and results."
But instead of trying to make deals on Capitol Hill -- where even some Republicans who once supported a comprehensive overhaul have turned against it -- Obama is taking his argument to the country, using the singular megaphone of the presidency to try to build a groundswell of support for legislation.
"I am asking you to add your voices to this," Obama said in El Paso. "We need Washington to know that there is a movement for reform gathering strength from coast to coast. That's how we'll get this done."
The push comes as many Latino voters, believing that the president never made good on his campaign promise to tackle immigration laws in the first year of his presidency, want to see him do more. They want Obama not just to push legislation but to act unilaterally to slow some deportations, something he has refused to do.
At the same time, the strategy allows Obama to highlight that Republicans are the ones blocking an immigration bill -- shifting responsibility away from himself as his re-election campaign approaches.
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 272 Comments
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 176 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Obama: Racism is no excuse for not excelling Play Video
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 116 Comments
- Both parties vow to "get to the bottom" of IRS scandal
Do you think you could throw in a few more liberal talking points? For that matter, do you have any clue what freedom and democracy even mean?
I guess I am "free" (under penalty) to purchase health insurance, huh? I'm "free" not to own a handgun. I'm "free" to pay for the health care and education of illegal invaders. I'm "free" to wear a helmet when riding my motorcycle. I'm "free" to pay taxes for things I don't want or disagree with. I'm "free" to have my land seized for the betterment of the community. I'm "free" to pay high gas prices because the government prints money and refuses to allow us to extract our own natural resources. We are free to have our businesses driven overseas because of restrictive regulations. If this is the liberal ideal of freedom, I want no part of it.
No. The problem is not that we are against freedom and democracy. We are just against your particular brand of freedom. BTW. Obama is one of those filthy rich, of whom you speak.
FU-Q OBAMA
See:
Clashes between Liberals and Conservatives - Washington, United Nations, Madison - Common denominator?
http://sytereitz.com/2011/04/clashes-between-liberals-and-conservatives-%E2%80%93-washington-united-nations-madison-common-denominator/
If you don't joke about the Republicons, you would have to cry.