​Good news for a change in Afghanistan

Maybe I'm just so used to the bad news lately that I'm making more of this than I should, but wasn't that a little good news last week from, of all places, Afghanistan?

I am serious! I read in the paper that Ashraf Ghani was sworn in as the new Afghan president, and get this: before the ceremony was done, he appointed Abdullah Abdullah -- his chief rival in the recent election -- to become the government's chief executive officer.

That's taken as a strong signal he intends to give the political opposition a real role in governing the country -- exactly what we had hoped for, but never got, in Iraq.

And unless I read this part wrong (and let's not say it too loud), this may be the result of U.S. diplomats who helped the two sides negotiate the power-sharing agreement after a long and bitter election process. So, a little shout-out here to that beleaguered American crew.

And here's the part I'm still not sure I believe but appears to be so: The Afghans are also signing an agreement that allows us to keep a small force of U.S. military people in the country as we draw down our forces -- that's the kind of arrangement, critics say, we should have insisted on before we left Iraq. [And had we had such a thing, maybe the country would not be in the state it is.]

No one believes Afghanistan is anywhere near where it needs to be -- corruption is rampant, the economy is a mess and terrorism is still a deadly force. But folded into the other events of last week, that's some progress.

f

We and our partners use cookies to understand how you use our site, improve your experience and serve you personalized content and advertising. Read about how we use cookies in our cookie policy and how you can control them by clicking Manage Settings. By continuing to use this site, you accept these cookies.