Garner decision sparks social media debate on body cameras
NEW YORK -- A series of controversial, and high-profile, fatal confrontations this year between police and young African-American males has spurred nationwide calls for police to use body-worn cameras, but social media users were quick to point out that a grand jury's decision Wednesday highlights the limitations of video footage.
Twitter users noted that, despite the movement to require police to wear cameras, July footage of New York City police officer Daniel Pantaleo using a chokehold on Eric Garner, who died after the confrontation, was not enough to get an indictment.
A New York City grand jury began reviewing evidence in the case Sept. 29 and announced Wednesday that it would file no charges in the case.
In cellphone video of the Garner incident, Pantaleo is seen placing his arm around Garner's neck and then taking him to the ground after Garner refuses to be handcuffed.
Garner is heard saying repeatedly, "I can't breathe!" He died a short time later.
Dear Obama: You're gonna need to do something more than just buying body cameras. Today showed us how much that'll help...
— Anu Dhillon (@adhillonz) December 4, 2014
Body cameras are not going to fix this. Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, and countless others' deaths were filmed. No one cares. No justice.
— Gen Marco (@garfjovi) December 4, 2014
Body cameras will be the same as high school football highlight films...bragging rights.
#EricGarner
#OutofOrder
— William Hardrick (@wzell81) December 4, 2014
Apparently the only reason why we need to put body cameras on cops is so they can watch and enjoy their work after the fact.
#EricGarner
— Joey Vincent (@mrjoeyvincent) December 4, 2014
NYPD choked #EricGarner to DEATH-yet they plan on implementing new body cameras on police officers to "eliminate" excessive force #FalseHope
— Deborah Martins (@Debb_Martins) December 4, 2014