Vindication or a Global Warming Whitewash?

The Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England. The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee said on March 30, 2010 that they'd seen no evidence to support charges that the CRU or its director, Phil Jones, had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate the threat of global warming two of the most serious criticisms levied against the climatologist and his colleagues. CBS

The first round of evidence is in but the controversy continues.

The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee investigating e-mails leaked from one of the world's leading climate research centers has largely vindicated the scientists involved. The inquiry said it had seen no evidence supporting charges that data was tampered with or the peer review process perverted to exaggerate the global warming threat.

Those are two of the most serious criticisms levied against the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit and its director, Phil Jones. In their report, the committee says, as far as it can determine, nothing in the more than 1,000 stolen e-mails challenged scientific consensus that global warming is real and caused by human activity.

As this is only the first of three planned investigations, the debate over the integrity of the science underpinning the argument for the existence of global warming is likely to go on. What's your opinion? Participate in our poll and let us know.



  • CBSNews

Comments

CBSN Live

pop-out
Live Video

Watch CBSN Live

Watch CBS News anytime, anywhere with the new 24/7 digital news network. Stream CBSN live or on demand for FREE on your TV, computer, tablet, or smartphone.