Liberals Concerned About Sotomayor's Abortion Views

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Pro-abortion rights groups are concerned about the fact that Sotomayor's judicial record does not reveal much about her position on abortion rights or the right to privacy. Not once in her 11 years as a federal appeals court judge has Sotomayor addressed the issue of abortion rights directly -- though in related cases, she has sided with both pro-abortion rights groups and anti-abortion rights groups.
"We simply don’t know Judge Sotomayor’s view on the bedrock constitutional case of Roe v. Wade," Nancy Northup, the president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, told CBS News Supreme Court correspondent Wyatt Andrews on Wednesday night.
Northup's organization sent an e-mail to its supporters, urging them to pressure the Senate to get answers from Sotomayor on her views.
NARAL Pro-Choice America sent out a similar message, the New York Times reports.
"Discussion about Roe v. Wade will — and must — be part of this nomination process," Nancy Keenan, president of Naral Pro-Choice America, wrote in a letter to the group's supporters. "As you know, choice hangs in the balance on the Supreme Court as the last two major choice-related cases were decided by a 5-to-4 margin."
Sotomayor's related rulings do not necessarily indicate where she falls on the issue. For instance, she ruled for renewed consideration of asylum claims from Chinese immigrants battling deportation orders on the grounds that China's policy of forcing women to have abortions for the purpose of population-control amounts to persecution.
In her opinion for Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, Sotomayor denied a claim from an abortion rights group arguing that a Bush administration policy violated its First Amendment, due process, and equal protection rights. The "Mexico City Policy" prohibited foreign organizations receiving U.S. funds from performing or supporting abortions. In her opinion, she said the government "is free to favor the anti-abortion position over the pro-choice position" with public funds.
White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday Mr. Obama did not ask Sotomayor specifically about her position on abortion.
"What we know about her we like, but I don't know the answer on abortion rights," said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Liberal concerns with Sotomayor's views extend beyond the issue of abortion.
Kevin Cathcart, executive director of the gay advocacy group Lambda Legal, is also asking the Senate to carefully scrutinize Sotomayor's record, the Politico reports, as other liberal activists weigh in as well.
"She is a mixed bag," Marjorie Cohn, president of the progressive National Lawyers Guild, said in an interview on Air America. "I’m thrilled that there will be the first Latina on the Supreme Court and that there will be another woman. But I really would have liked to have seen a real progressive counterweight to radical rightists on the court."
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 90 CommentsPosted by curb_global_warming_now at 6:18 PM : May 28,
In the book of Genesis, Gen. 1: 1
"In the beginning GOD created the Heavens and the Earth"
Since he made it, He owns it and everything and everyone in it. That gives him exclusive right to do what he will. If you disagree, take your grievence to GOD. Since I am not GOD, get out of my face about your displeasure.
Posted by curb_global_warming_now at 5:01 PM : May 28
Tell you what Rowdy, 'You' decide while you read this. Ooooopps. I forgot, you don't read..do you!!!!
"I asked God to take away
My habit.
God said, No.
It is not for me to take away,
But for you to give it up.
I asked God to make my handicapped child whole.
God said, No.
His spirit is whole, his body is only temporary.
I asked God to grant me patience.
God said, No. Patience is a byproduct of tribulations;
It isn't granted, it is learned.
I ask ed God to give me happiness.
God said, No..
I give you blessings;
Happiness is up to you.
I asked God to spare me pain.
God said, No.
Suffering draws you apart from
Worldly cares and brings you closer to me.
I asked God to make my spirit grow.
God said, No. You must grow on your own, but I will prune you to make you fruitful.
I asked God for all things
That I might enjoy life.
God said, No.
I will give you life,
So that you may enjoy all things.
I asked God to help me LOVE others, as much as He loves me
God said...Ahhhh,
Finally you have the idea. "
Posted by curb_global_warming_now at 4:25 PM : May 28
Rowdy, I didn't recognize you at first. Good disguise...
Posted by curb_global_warming_now at 4:19 PM : May 28,
Not a bitter bone in my body, but I have no time for willing stupidity.
Sotomayer will not be confirmed...........................
Posted by Mr_2258-007 at 3:58 PM : May 28, 2009
It is a possibility, They may decide to "Bork" her nomination. We may lose again. I have contempt for most politicians because regardless of how they start out, they end up liars and thieves and we end up losers........
Posted by curb_global_warming_now at 3:34 PM : May 28
Omnipotence is awesome, isn't it!!! never met me, but you know all about me. LOLOL.
First off, I wasn't talking to you (unless you are hungry1968 in disguise) How did you get into our tete a' tete? Also, it would be wise to check up on me by reading more than a few posts.
Posted by hungry1968-15 at 2:58 PM : May 28, 2009
You go back and re-read this comment forum and tell 'me' who first brought up religion... I didn't, you did!!!! I haven't pushed any (religious) view on you in this commentary. If you have the freedom to belittle me about (your interpretation) of my beliefs, then I should have equal right to respond in kind.
Posted by ToolMangler1 at 2:55 PM : May 28, 2009
YOU made a statement.
I asked you a question REGARDING that statement.
What's "trollish" about that?
(Hint: If you don't want to get called on the BS known as "your religion", then keep your bizarre religious thoughts to yourself!!)
And Catholics won't talk about the raping of little boys.
But they'll ALMOST let a raped woman have an abortion?
Posted by gravyboat69 at 2:52 PM : May 28, 2009
http://forthardknox.com/2007/11/30/poster-of-the-day-abstinence-99999-effective/
It's a pretty simple question, in response to YOUR post.
Your answer is......?
Posted by hungry1968-15 at 2:49 PM : May 28, 2009
My answer is, If 'you' know the Bible, why do you write as if you are clueless? I will not go down the path you want me to because you are a troll and I am not. I would enjoy discussion but in this case I am speaking to dead air, hence, nothing to discuss.
Posted by curb_global_warming_now at 2:51 PM : May 28, 2009
Exactly.
(He admitted this to me, in response to my asking him, if he thought it was acceptable to sell his daughter into slavery, own slaves, burn sacrifices on the altar, kill those that work on Sundays, etc, etc in accordance with leviticus.)
Posted by curb_global_warming_now
It's in the Old Testament.
Posted by gravyboat69 at 2:39 PM : May 28, 2009
Rick doesn't believe in the Old Testament.
He believes it "disappeared" when Jesus died on the cross.
Posted by hungry1968-15
Hence, no talk among Christians about the rapinig of Mary.
And Catholics won't talk about the raping of little boys.
But they'll ALMOST let a raped woman have an abortion?
Posted by hungry1968-15 at 2:37 PM : May 28, 2009
See!!! There you go again. you know that I am not ricky...
Posted by ToolMangler1 at 2:43 PM : May 28, 2009
Actually that was directed at: CBS_bans_Conservatives.
HE is singinrick.
(Note how quickly he tucked tail and ran when I asked him the question!!)
Posted by ToolMangler1 at 2:40 PM : May 28, 2009
In response to "did god rape Mary", ****YOU**** replied:
"Didn't have to, He created her (and all of us) so it was no big deal to create a body for his Son inside her.
Posted by ToolMangler1 at 2:19 PM : May 28, 2009"
If he created ALL of us, then he MUST create those that are born suffering from horrible and debilitating birth defects and diseases, correct?
It's a pretty simple question, in response to YOUR post.
Your answer is......?
Posted by curb_global_warming_now
It's in the Old Testament.
Posted by gravyboat69 at 2:39 PM : May 28, 2009
Rick doesn't believe in the Old Testament.
He believes it "disappeared" when Jesus died on the cross.
You can't make an absolute statement like that unless you have proof to back it up.
But since you've never died, you can't back it up.
Now get a life...
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 2:36 PM : May 28, 2009
I can't say it absolutely.
You're the idiot proclaiming to have a lock on the "truth" - not me.
Posted by hungry1968-15 at 2:37 PM : May 28, 2009
See!!! There you go again. you know that I am not ricky...
You dummy atheists will make the claim that he didn't do it because of athiesm, even though he, like you, mocked, scoffed at, ridiculed, and despised Christianty.
So hungry, will you share your experience of death with this forum or not?
After all you did make the absolute statement that it is "the end".
So you should be able to describe your personal experience....it had to be pretty wild!
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 2:35 PM : May 28, 2009
Stalin killed those people in the name of "communism", not atheism, dummy.
He didn't single out and kill JUST religious types, just christians, just jews, etc, etc.
He killed EVERYONE that he thought opposed him.
But this has been explained to you 20 times already, and you know this.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 90 Comments