Clinton Hints at Clinton-Obama Ticket, Again

(CBS)
HATTIESBURG, MISS. -- During a campaign rally, Hillary Clinton told the crowd that the upcoming Mississippi primary is “contested” and that their votes will count in choosing the next president, but she recognized that the choice between her and Obama is not easy for some.
“You’ve gotta make a choice. A lot of people wish they didn’t have to. I’ve got people saying, ‘I wish I could vote for both of you.’ Well, that might be possible someday, but first I need your vote on Tuesday!”
Clinton spoke before a crowd of around 600 people in a state where the former First Lady admits will be a difficult win for her.
“This is a contested primary and it is exciting. You know, Mississippi’s votes are going to count. I know that I may have an uphill battle here in this state, I appreciate that. Some people said, ‘why did you even come?’…I said, ‘I’ll tell you why I’m going to go to Mississippi to know that I’m for them, that I will work for you.’”
Clinton’s decision to campaign in Mississippi is best summed up by a senior campaign aide who said Clinton will campaign in as many states as possible in order “to pick up her share of delegates.”
Following the event, Clinton held a press conference where she addressed comments made by an Obama adviser, Samantha Power, who resigned today after calling Clinton "a monster” during a newspaper interview.
“I think Senator Obama did the right thing, but I think that it is important to look at what she and his other advisers say behind closed doors particularly when they are talking to foreign governments and foreign press. It raises disturbing questions about what the real planning and policy positions within the Obama campaign happen to be.” Clinton was referring to comments Power made a few months ago that discredited any Iraq exit plan because of the high potential of having to change that plan.
Clinton was also pressed on comments her communications director Howard Wolfson made where he likened the Obama campaign to former Whitewater independent counsel Ken Starr. Initially Clinton backed away from the comment, but when pressed by a reporter, she admitted the comment held some validity.
“I am very focused on this campaign and you know, you’ve made the comparison between those two," she said. When a reporter pointed out that her spokesman actually made the comparison she said, "Well, I think that one is and ad hominem attack and the other is a historical reference."
The reporter countered, "But he said that 'I don’t know how anyone who can imitate Ken Starr can win the Democratic presidential nomination.'"
"Well, I think that is a true statement,” Clinton responded.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 32 CommentsI wonder why the Democratic Party leaders are allowing this soap opera to continue, fully aware that she has no chance in hell to win the nomination. Is the leadership such a hostage to the Clinton machine?
Please spare us more of the blood sport the Clintons%u2019 are playing. I hope that the Obama campaign does not agree to any kind of %u201Cre-do%u201D in Michigan and Florida %u2013 it is another trap.
No way, not even on position Number 100.
The dems know that there is no way that the Super''s could vote against the will of the pledged delegates and get away with the general election. Such a move would disenfranchise the Obama support from the general election.
I would have to hold my nose enough now to vote for Hillary but if she tried to usurp the vote using Supers that would be untenable to me.
-Molly (summer 2007 intern)
-Molly (summer 2007 intern)
The reason why this will happen is because the Dems have to unite. There is a statistical tie. No side will be happy unless both are on the ticket.
http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2008/03/clinton-it-depends-on-whos-on-top.html#links
Hillary/Obama ''08
It''s kind of pathetic, that Hillary has been reduced to bucking for a Vice Presidency, all the while trying to sound like she still has a chance of being on top of the ticket herself.
End the drama - vote Obama.
I fail to follow your logic. At this moment, Senator Obama leads in pledged delegates, the number of states won, and the popular vote. The mathematical probability is that she will not catch him, at the very least in pledged delegates. Why on earth would he join forces with Hillary Clinton? A more rational plea would be for Hillary Clinton to join forces with Barack Obama. You obviously support Senator Clinton. I think what you mean is take back America for the Clintons.
I fail to follow your logic. At this moment, Senator Obama leads in pledged delegates, the number of states won, and the popular vote. The mathematical probability is that she will not catch him, at the very least in pledged delegates. Why on earth would he join forces with Hillary Clinton? A more rational plea would be for Hillary Clinton to join forces with Barack Obama. You obviously support Senator Clinton. I think what you mean is take back America for the Clintons.
Hmmm... I could be wrong.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 32 Comments