Picking Bush's Brain
(CBS)
As the President and Karl Rove walked away from the lectern after their emotional announcement of Rove’s resignation, I yelled a question.
“If he’s so smart, why did you lose Congress?”
The President, as usual, didn’t answer.
That’s OK – he doesn’t have to if he doesn’t want to.
But judging by some of the reaction, you’d think I had been shouting obscenities in church!
“Unprofessional;” “Inappropriate;” “Unbecoming;” “Doesn’t show much class;” “you are a total idiot;” “Shill for the liberal Democrats.”
People who sympathize with the President – no matter who the President happens to be – always seem to think it’s impolite to yell questions. Or they argue that the question is inappropriate at the moment. That may sometimes be true, but not [this time].
Rove has been a controversial figure in this administration, the man most often credited or blamed with framing support for the war by politicizing terrorism.
There was no time to frame that question because the event this morning was a statement, not a news conference. So I asked a more direct one. I thought it unlikely that they would answer, but it’s always worth a try.
This isn’t the first time I’ve been blasted for yelling. Twenty or so years ago, I yelled a question at President Reagan as he left the Rose Garden after the annual Teacher of the Year ceremony.
One woman wrote to tell me that I was a guest in the President’s house and ought to be behave as one.
Ten years ago, I asked President Clinton a question which brought a red-faced angry response.
The point is that reporters are not here as guests. We’re here to ask questions.
Why?
Because if we were ever to agree to “behave,” we’d be walking away from our First Amendment role – and then we really would be the shills we’re so often accused of being.
Rove is said to be responsible for contributing to the election, and re-election of George W. Bush. Vehement personal attacks against campaign opponents are the Karl Rove trade mark. While working for the elected President Bush, Rove was instrumental in orchestrating the case for war against Saddam Hussein (an evil dictator).
Although, President Bush has called for %u201Creach across the isle%u201D politics from the Democratic Party, Rove and Bush have done nothing from their side to reach out, or compromise on any issue causing a break-down in the functioning of our Congress.
Karl Rove%u2019s obsession with perception management as a substitute for actual governmental administration has $cost the American People more then we will be able to realize for years to come.
You are no more an objective reporter than Dan Rather was.
Is it because you think that your little leftist world is crumbling around your ears that you have to resort to yelling a breathless, desperate cat-calling loaded questions to the President?
How smart do you think YOU are for working as a Democrat Party shill at CBS?
How smart could you possibly be, working for last-place-in-the-ratings CBS?
Are the poor ratings a result of you and your liberal cohorts and the non-stop liberal agenda pushing by CBS?
Think about it, Bill.
For once just think about it.
If the fifth estate had not been asleep at their posts for the entire 21st century, maybe we wouldn't have sunken into the quagmire we have, in Iraq, in Iran, in New Orleans and in the District of Columbia. What a mess. And the conservatives have no one with whom to share the blame.
No doubt the cretin above feels that Fox News provides some imagined Father-Coughlin-like public service, but I see their role as more of the betrayer of the principles on which the US was founded. The traditional broadcast networks have been only cowardly. Fox was and is subversive.
And I see the entirety of the Bush administration the same. Their entire effort has been focussed on subverting every last department of the government to the purpose of consolidating their power.
Meanwhile every worthwhile service of government has gone to hell. I say blame, Karl Rove, blame George Bush and the father he rode in on (though the elder was never the abject failure the son has become), blame Dick Cheney, blame Alberto Gonzales, and blame all the cabinet members and GOP hangers-on who have walked the walk of shame out of the house on Pennsylvania Avenue.
They have made an unholy mess, and it won't be known for decades whether their brash, self-righteous and thoughtless actions have actually destroyed our government.
You are obviously no Edward R. Murrow or Walter Cronkite.
One can only assume that the question you asked of Clinton was if he had committed adultery and had s-e-x with the White House intern, Monica Lewinski, giving him the opportunity to lie about what really happened.
I can imagine that Clinton would have gotten red-faced and angrily denied it, putting on a show for the cameras, like only a Democrat, and especially a Clinton, knows how to do.
And I would believe you would have quickly apologized and changed the subject, Bill.
Any answers?
Karl Rove has been all talk, and now he walks%u2026
However, I think the timing and manner of the asking says more about Bill Plante than about the folks he was shouting at.
It is just another example of the types of things done by the media that the public by and large doesn't like and that they use as their guide when choosing which news source to watch, listen to, and trust.
I say, great job Karl. Now America sees liberals for who they really are.
Another question Bush would not answer is how severely Rove's actions have intensified partisan divisiveness and hindered governance.
http://www.diversityjobmarket.com/library/politics/100298mccurry-depart.html
Wow, so Bill Plante asked similarly pointed questions while covering the Clinton White House.
Yeah, Bill Plante, shill for the Democratic Party.
I say, great job Karl. Now America sees liberals for who they really are.
Posted by One_American"
Utterly laughable. So much love in your post.
And I would believe you would have quickly apologized and changed the subject, Bill.
Posted by One_American"
Did you even bother to research this and find out if it really happened, or did you just make it all up to fit your point?
What a tool.
-CBS The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson
"There was no time to frame that question because the event this morning was a statement, not a news conference. So I asked a more direct one."
I've got a question for you: What important information did you hope to get with your question?
What newsworthy insight did you think would be the result of your off-the-cuff, shouted, question?
As an experienced White House Correspondent: is that really the best you are capable of?
Or, were you just caught up in the moment, that you won't have Rove to kick around anymore and despite your best efforts couldn't get any accusations to stick and you let your frustrations get the best of you?
Or, did you just revert back to the school boy days of making the other student laugh by blurting things out or making *** noises in the back of the class room?
For the responder who asks, "Well, what answer did you get?" He wasn't going to get an answer on this or any other real question except, "Do you like the big yellow rug in the Oval Office, sir?" So it's better to have a real reporter yell an impertinent question. Let it hang there in mid-air while the audience wonders what the answer might be.
Rove gave an NPR interview just before the November elections. He said they were going to win, and he had the "real numbers." Would a genius be saying that?
DC will not stand for such a thing.
Did it ever occur to either of you genius's that there'd be a fewer Bill Plantes sounding off if "W" would just tell the truth once in a while.
That's not to say that a Pres should be expected to tell the truth "all" the time, but . . . once in a while would be nice!
There should be more reporters like Bill...It was bad enough when Rove was "in", but I worry more now, what will he be up to, and not have to answer for it. WOW....
Yes - this comment is just as much inappropriate as Bill's was.
A note to br77rino. There is nothing civil about calling anyone who opposes the Iraq war a traitor. There is nothing civil about cutting off electricity to a room where democrats are trying to hold a meeting in the hope that it will shut off conversation about a topic that you don't like. There is nothing civil about just about anything the republicans did while they held the majority and precious little since they lost it. The republicans became drunk with power and became extremely uncivil.
Better yet, Plante should go back and take lessons from his peer at the NYT, Elisabeth Bumiller.
Ms. Bumiller was asked about her recordings of the President's statements in response to scripted questions during the press conference prior to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. She was asked by some unserious person whether the media should have asked original, unscripted, and indeed fact-based questions on the Eve of the invasion. Ms. Bumiller responded thusly,
"I think we were very deferential because in the East Room press conference it's live. It's very intense. It's frightening to stand up there.
I mean think about it, you're standing up on prime time live televsion asking the President of the United States a question and when the country is about to go to war. There was a very serious, somber tone that evening and I think it made, you know, nobody wanted to get into an argument with the president at this serious time."
Mr. Plante, that's real stenography. That's how a journalist behaves.
A few months ago an article referred to Security Contractors from North Carolina whose principal is a friend and contributor to Bush. The reporter dropped the real story on this organization which now unfortunately surfaces in the MERCENARY classification in Iraq. Two of the Blackwater contractors have appeared on TV agreeing they were PAID MERCENARIES and their job was whatever they were paid to do. Iraqi stories by the PEOPLE relate to these same MERCENARIES as being part of the INSURGENTS whom the media portrays as the KILLERS of innocent people. The stories also relate to the SOMARA MOSQUE bombing indicating that the bomber was a paid MERCENARY not an insurgent.
The above issues HAVE NEVER BEEN REPORTED IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA.
Is the 2008 candidate standings being MICRO MANAGED BY THE MEDIA. The people do not believe Kucinich is an underdog even though the media has established he is.
William J Clemons
willclem@grics.net
-
by letendre3
August 16, 2007 2:57 PM PDT
- Way to go, Bill!!! GEAUX, TIGER!!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 32 Comments