Merger and Acquisition Activity To Pick Up As Lockheed Moves First?

Last Updated Jul 27, 2009 5:51 AM EDT

In the last major down turn in defense spending during the Clinton Administration there was a severe contraction in the number of firms doing defense work. Rather then companies going under as they had in past down periods many merged with others. This was actually encouraged by the government as a way to reduce the defense industrial base in a stable manner. If the future defense budgets in the U.S. will begin to get smaller under Obama then the same thing will probably happen again.

While there have been significant M&A activity in the last nine years of growing military spending it has been driven by two factors. First, European companies have bought U.S. ones to allow easier access to the market that is governed by a complex set of rules and laws relating to citizens and export of technical information. QinetiQ has been a good example of that with the British company buying medium or small U.S. companies. VT has also done the same thing. EADS has been more careful but has said they are looking at acquisitions in the next years.

The second is a large defense company buying a niche one to gain technology or a product, or to enter a market area that they haven't been in. Lockheed Martin just agreed to purchase the privately owned Gyrocam Systems for example. Gyrocam makes vehicle based surveillance systems that have been used by the U.S. military in Afghanistan and Iraq. Often you will see a small company grow to a point where the founders want to sell and perhaps move on to another project. This is similar to how things have gone in the technology or biotech industries.

If the number of large procurement programs begin to fall as in the Nineties then there will be pressure on the big companies to merge. This is what happened with Lockheed and Martin Marietta or Boeing and McDonnell Douglas. If there is only F-35 aircraft being built the U.S. may end up with only one fighter aircraft. If there are no new destroyers it will be hard to keep multiple ship yards going. The opportunities for the non-American companies to continue to win contracts will also decline especially if the bad economy makes Congress act even more protectionist.

If there will be a severe contraction in the U.S. defense business and that is not know as the 2011 and out budget has not been released yet but major cuts should be expected right now. Iraq will be winding down and it will be hard now for Obama to sustain Afghanistan with the Democratic Congress now that he admits "victory" is not a goal. Gates has made it clear that major weapons acquisitions other then the F-35 and the KC-X are not going to happen again soon and that will affect the investment budget size. This contraction in spending will lead to a smaller number of companies winning contracts which may see them go away or merge with the bigger ones as they look for new products and markets to keep going. There is definitely some uncertainty out in the market and it will continue without some signs from the Administration as to what they will do in 2011 and later.

  • Matthew Potter

    Matthew Potter is a resident of Huntsville, Ala., where he works supporting U.S. Army aviation programs. After serving in the U.S. Navy, he began work as a defense contractor in Washington D.C. specializing in program management and budget development and execution. In the last 15 years Matthew has worked for several companies, large and small, involved in all aspects of government contracting and procurement. He holds two degrees in history as well as studying at the Defense Acquisition University. He has written for Seeking Alpha and at his own website, DefenseProcurementNews.com.