
Preview: Steve Jobs
October 20, 2011 11:10 AM
Apple CEO Steve Jobs refused to allow surgeons to perform what could have been life-saving surgery on his pancreatic cancer, says his biographer Walter Isaacson. Hear more of Isaacson's revelations about Jobs on Sunday at 7 p.m. ET/PT. Steve Kroft reports.




- 1
- 2
- Next »
See all 23 CommentsUnfortunately, modern and traditional medicine with this rare and uncommon type of pancreatic cancer has a pretty good cure rate unlike the cure rate for the more common deadly form.(like Patrick Swayze had)
If Steve Jobs goal was to survive this disease then why didn't he look at the statistical evidence that suggests surgery would have cured him?
I think pharmaceutical companies can be sleazy but I also believe there are some pretty sleazy holistic cons out there. Those who sell herbs and vitamins and juicers and whatever else also have a bias that may not be in the consumers best interest.
If you do a quick search of alternative cancer cures, there seems to be an abundance of claims that target specifically the hopeless pancreatic cancer patients. Hmmmm... now who's the villain?
For too many days in various media and Internet forums Job's story has been used to falsely make a case against 'alternative' medicine. However, seeking justification for an ideology in this fashion is a sign of irrationality and attachment, not of sound medical or scientific judgment.
Unfortunately, many laypeople (incl. journalists), and some in healthcare, have a magical view of the efficacy of biomedicine, esp. regarding the diagnosis and treatment of diseases like cancer. But many laypeople and non-ideological scientists, MD's & alternative med. professionals have a more rational view.
The above cited NYT article makes clear that Job's individual case makes for no absolute conclusions, esp. regarding the value of biomedicine or of 'alternative medicine. Whether Jobs would or would not have lived longer and better if he had surgery is unknown. The survival rate for liver/pancreatic cancer using biomedicine is far from good.
The fact is that people have treated many diseases with diet and/or herbs, with pharmaceuticals and surgery and with combos of both. With each of these three approaches there have been both successes and failures.
The best solution to any given health problem is an individualized diagnosis often by more than one approach (i.e., including alternative medical disciplines) and the use of whatever healthcare approaches can, individually or in a complementary fashion, lead to better health with a relative minimum of risk and cost.
Pancreatic cancer is a disease in which common methods have failed to provide significant, life-saving results for the majority of those inflicted. Jobs' legacy was to defy the "definition of insanity" - that is, to continue performing the same tasks and expect different results. He chose to do what he felt was most appropriate for his body - to call that "stupid" is insulting to him, his family, his friends and his supporters, not to mention the millions of people fighting cancer the ways they feel works best for their bodies.
So to say that he refused cancer treatment looking for alternative medicine and that that is the cause of his death is more of a propaganda for Big Pharma.
Rest in peace Steve Job, who is to say what could have saved you; surgery, diet started sooner vs later, electromagnetic shielding devices to protect your DNA. I don't think Steve was ignorant about medicine. It was his precise knowledge of the "Voodoo"/haphazard, disconnected, HMO-bottom-line driven nature of how modern medicine is practiced that perhaps drew him to a form of medicine more conducive to synergistically working with ones body. We will never know, though we should, but leave it to the established-fear based order deflect focus and to find Steve Job's death as an opportunity to advance their agenda of discrediting alternative forms of medicine. What is it they say, oh yes "Never waste a catastrophe or tragedy" to advance your cause.
- 1
- 2
- Next »
See all 23 Comments