The Boy Next Door

May 14, 2011 7:45 PM

Three murders from Chicago to Los Angeles and an alleged serial killer on the run. Who's killing beautiful young women? Maureen Maher reports.


by awmee July 11, 2012 7:04 PM EDT: GOOD DETECTIVE WORK! THEY WORK SOOOO HARD.; Reply to this comment


by algonquinca April 30, 2012 2:09 AM EDT: why did he kill these girls? reason?; Reply to this comment


by labailora1227 February 27, 2012 8:41 PM EST: so the girl never opened the door, Asthon Kutcher thought it was 'wine," did he never call the police???; Reply to this comment


by Curious-of January 25, 2012 1:02 PM EST: i don't understand why the last surviving victim can't just i.d. him or his voice? I've learned from these episodes that detectives are just people with feelings and flaws like everyone else. They're not super human robot crime crime solvers with ice in their vanes. They have a job to do and they need their cases solved. I believe it's possible many detectives are capable catching who they think did it no matter what. Whether it's frustration, ego, lack of drive and initiative or just plain laziness and reputation. I know it sounds crazy but what's up with the lack of info on Ashton's involvement? And there's no way dude was gonna confess to that girls dad :/ sometimes people want answers so bad they manufacture what they believe; Reply to this comment


by jikjik07 October 27, 2011 11:56 PM EDT: He is either the world's DUMBEST MOST STUPID serial killer EVER (killing someone next door anywhere he moves to, and leaving one shoe cover at the scene and hiding the other in the attics of his apt to be conveniently found), or someone is trying hard to frame him (at least in the case of the last 3 attacks). Whoever that someone might be, I bet he is some how connected to the first murder!; Reply to this comment


by myuzik September 15, 2011 12:27 PM EDT: this killer did not think this was fair! so typical of these guys!; Reply to this comment


by myuzik September 15, 2011 12:24 PM EDT: DNA ON TOP OF her fingernails could have been from casual contact!!!??? The family said they were not 'involved' - is this guy as goofy as he looks?; Reply to this comment


by myuzik September 15, 2011 12:22 PM EDT: CC police!? the DNA under her fingernails could have been from casual contact!!!??? The family said they were not 'involved' - is this guy as goofy as he looks?; Reply to this comment


by lance_smith2001 September 1, 2011 3:56 PM EDT: This story points out how important meticulous proper documentation is in crime scene analysis, since we now rely on science so much, the smallest oversight can make or break a case. DNA does not lie, but if not handled correctly it loses it's credibility.; Reply to this comment


by lance_smith2001 September 1, 2011 3:51 PM EDT: Cook County really screwed up, for such a violent crime back then and they seemed to have viewed it too casually and the results were more victims, it's all very tragic. It's obvious that this guy is a true psycopath, he was manipulative and a homicidal maniac at a young age and then he continued his blood lust. This guy is really scarey, he is pure evil with no real emotions other than his absurd denials of guilt.; Reply to this comment

Recent Shows