Slot Machines: The Big Gamble
January 9, 2011 5:00 PM
Lesley Stahl reports on the proliferation of gambling to 38 states and its main attraction, the slot machine, newer versions of which some scientists believe may addict their players.
Slot Machines: The Big Gamble
Web Extras









- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- Next »
See all 81 CommentsI like the guy's patter on political subjects but his unwavering and passionate promotion of gambling and the damage done to the people of Pennsylvania is stunning and unforgivable. The Harvard professor failed to read his colleague, BF Skinner's body of work and the evidence confirming it
60 minutes touched on the science behind behavior control (addiction) with a bright anthropoligist who gets it. Control over behavior is a well established discipline and is based on the delivery of reinforcers (rewards and punishments) on specific schedules. The field is called Operant Conditioning and gambling is the easiest behavior over which we can achieve control.
Since Skinner published Behavior of Organisms in 1938, there has been no question that intermittent reinforcement applied scientifically, absolutely controls behavior , as was amply demonstrated by its victims on 60 minutes. In fact it is widely know that presenting most primates including humans with a reward schedule that deliver one reward for X number of tries produces endless reward seeking behavior, no brain scan needed. The behavior and reward can be in the form of begging for money and getting it every 10th try ,casting 28 times for for fish and getting one , pressing buttons fast in Pachinko parlors, begging or asking for sexual favors 50 times with one payoff, pressing levers or buttons on slot machines rapidly with intermittant coin drops.
Hundreds of published studies in Behavior Analysis Journals demonstrate that the effect of the correct schedules of reinforcement and intermittent rewards are so compelling that they can produces perfect control over the subjects behavior.
Yes it absolutely stunned Skinner having proved it, that government would fund itself on the hard luck of the poor. Skinner commented brilliantly on the irony to the effect that .....if states are to depend on income from gambling behavior, then it is our duty to assist the state by creating more gamblers by teaching it in the public schools. Based on his performance tonight, Rendell would agree and miss the point. Finally, Rendell can not be that stupid though - check what and who his reinforcers are, press folks.
I have seen Rendell bully interviewers before. on several occasions. Caught He turns to bullying when he can't deal honestly with questions and most folks back away. Sixty minutes was not bullied and presented the facts of increased gambling.
development of a large gambling is the same as a is a bully and The results suggest Rendell Few folks have read BF Skinner's Behavior of Organisms
Other players have asked me many times if they can play on my twins box. I let them. They're giving up over 10%. They can walk across he room and play roulette at a 2.6% disadvantage.
Make no mistake about it. There ARE experts "out there" who ARE NOT BEING funded by the gambling interests. One of those experts is Dr. Earl L. Grinols,"Gambling in America." Dr. Grinols begins one chapter with a quote from Martin Luther King: "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." I don't doubt the sincerity of all who have commented. I do doubt how well informed many of them are. Dr. Grinols has done the research as has Dr. John Kindt, a business law professor, who says, "Governments used to be protectors that provided police and fire...now they're predators, advertising to and preying on the public." That is the real issue regarding the expansion of gambling without further, unbiased information being provided to the public. How can legislators looking for the "quick fix" now become the biggest "pushers of an addictive product without dealing with facts? (I have always been a supporter of Ed Rendell but can no longer be! His behavior on Sunday night was the same arrogance that we see in many politicians today. That has to stop!)
Another issue is figures that get thrown around about how small a percentage of people are actually addicted. The conservative experts use the figure of from to 3 to 5%. Others have the figure from 7 to 10%. Considering this is called the "hidden addiction," and because the pathological gambler is in denial until his or her last source of money to fuel the addiction is gone, the 3 to 5% is inaccurate, and the figure is more than likely much higher. However, I would ask those who support casinos, lotteries, etc., which 3 to 5% of your family are you willing to give up to this illness? And those of you who reject that it is an illness even though the facts do not support you, what do you call it? If the person who gambles excessively is not ill and is just a no-good embezzler, thief, bad parent or spouse, unreliable employee, etc., what percentage of our population would you accept before thinking something needed to be done? Research shows that a pathological gambler affects in a negative way at least 10 other people: children, parents, spouses, other relatives, employers, friends, more. Now! Are we talking about a small number of people?
Les Bernal, Ex. Director of Stop Preadatory Gambling put the emphasis on the word "predatory." Our government should never be in the role of predator. The study done by the National Gambling Impact Study commission made many suggestions not the least of which was to stop the expansion of gambling in the country until further information was gathered. All of the recommendations were ignored as has all the further information that has been gathered. All because we have become a nation of greedy people who want the "quick fix." And many of our leaders are leading us down a very slippery slope--literally building budgets on a "house of cards!"
As to respect for 60 Minutes, my respect has gone up greatly for them! They have actually produced the first national media show that has begun to pick up the rock of the gambling business in America. (God only knows what will crawl out from under THAT rock!!!!) Have no doubt about it! Gambling is a business--albeit a scurrilous one! They are not in business to lose money, and anyone who does "win," is winning on the backs of the addicts who do not spend "extra cash" that they have. They gamble ALL the money they have; and when they run out of their own money, they are quite adept at taking money from others!
If one is armed with the facts, informed decisions, which will be quite different than some of the ones expressed in these comments, can be made. Contrary to what gambling interests would have us believe, there really is a LOT of research done so that we all can make informed decisions! They want to downplay the research and convince the suckers who are born every minute that they exist to entetain them!
As an aside: If anyone reading this is either a compulsive gambler or someone who is being affected by someone with a gambling problem, check local phonebooks for Gamblers Anonymous or Gam-Anon family groups numbers, go on the website of these groups, or use the 1-800 number listed in an above comment. You are not alone! Even if we have legislators and some of the people making comments here who think you are an insignificant number and have a choice, there are others who know differently.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- Next »
See all 81 Comments