Fatal Choice
January 8, 2011 7:45 PM
A doctor's wife claims self-defense after she kills her millionaire husband. Was he worth more dead than alive? "48 Hours Mystery" correspondent Peter Van Sant reports.
Fatal ChoiceJanuary 8, 2011 7:45 PM
A doctor's wife claims self-defense after she kills her millionaire husband. Was he worth more dead than alive? "48 Hours Mystery" correspondent Peter Van Sant reports.
Fatal Choice
The War in Chicago 42:58 May 18, 2013
Unraveling the lies of Jodi Arias 43:25 May 17, 2013
Murder at Sea? 42:59 May 11, 2013
Over the Edge 43:11 May 4, 2013
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- Next »
See all 67 CommentsJudging by some of the comments on here, she has sucked some of you guys in as well.
This women is ridiculous.
She wanted the life she had with him, which was money, so she did not leave him even though he was abusive. After she got the knife her movement should have been toward an open door that leaded outside.
I do not think the man was a monster, but was sick of his wife, and did not want his wife to profit from him, since he did not love her anymore, and was not able to get rid of her without losing a portion of his wealth to her.
He certainly was not dangerous, due to the weapon he used.
She had no remorse in her voice.
The lady could have ended her marriage with something, but she wanted more.
She put herself in this situation by being greedy.
I do not feel sorry for her, because I don't think she was still with him out of love.
She told us in the interview, she did not want to ever lose what she had there, is why she did not leave her husband. GREED ended her up in prison.
If you use your common sense, you would realize that she is prbably not guilty.
If she is in fact guilty....
Why the f*** should she claim he attacked her with this tiny knife on the key??? make no sense
Why the f*** should she call immediately the police? (She couldnt know exactly how long he is still alive)and why the f*** should she let him even out of the house?? again, make no sense if it was murder...
Why is her husband responding to the question "Was there an Argument" not simple with a "no"? So, the conclusion could be, that there was an argument or anything like it. Which disproofs the prosecutors theory...
also, why ist it that some witnesses testified that they knew she was abused by her husband in the past? well, you may say that she made this up to plan the murder later. But, my first 3 points disproof that..
Then just look at her. You guys are really think that she is acting? cmon....no way. You often see after the verdict is written, if the defendant is truely guilty or not.
You see her after she hear the verdict in total anger and disbelief. She was even so angry at the jury that she reaches out to them with a emotional "shame on you".
The same thing when she talks about the fatal night or after the trial. She just not behave and react like a guilty person. Does that mean she is really innocent? no, but its just another indication...
The jury convicting her beyond a reasonable doubt, is totally ridicolous.
(if my english is not perfect, sorry. im from europe)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- Next »
See all 67 Comments