CBS Doc Dot Com
Debate: Should Same Sex Marriage Be Legal?
March 11, 2010 5:31 AM
Marriage is widely recognized as an institution that improves the health and wellness of individuals and society. Dr. Jon LaPook hosts a debate about whether same sex marriage should be legalized.
Recent Segments See All Videos
Scroll Left Scroll Right
- 1
- 2
- Next »
See all 25 CommentsIf you don't believe in gay marriage don't marry one. Leave them alone and leave me alone.
Problem solved next!
The human race has no right to deny anyone anything under God. Anyone who believes in Him should be given access to His blessings.
And in the end as in all things God will be the final judge.
Not the members of his church.
A true and honest faith would honor all those seeking any holy union.
Anything short of that is sectarian manipulaion of The Holy Spirit.
Legally, this is a Constitutional matter. We are all entitled to be treated equally.
We are also entitled to worship as we choose.
But nowhere does the document say that the worshipers should have influence on the right to equality.
We are, all of us, "One nation, under God".
I already know that there are a lot of people among you that will find a lot of reasons to justify their choice.
That is my opinion but you can do what you want, I don't care, because I know that I won't pay for bad human behaviors.
I would like to say the same thin for you too...
My lousy grammar is justified because I'm still learnig English, you can judge me because you are perfect, never in your life you were a student.
According to my knowledge, someone doesn't need to write perfectly to express his opinion.
I already know that there are a lot of people among you that will find a lot of reasons to justify their choice.
that is my opinion but you can do what you want, I don't care, because I know that I won't pay for bad human behaviors.
This discussion would be far more credible if a properly credentialed psychologist presented an opposing view. Instead a spokesperson from an organization whose stated goal is ?bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy? was chosen.
The purpose of her organization, and its inherent animus toward gays and gay marriage should be clearly identified at the start of the segment. It would help to put her vague and unsubstantiated references to social science research in perspective.
N.O.W. intends to change marriage so that it guarantees women the right to at least six sources of income, while men snockered into "accidentally" getting women pregnant have nothing to do but pay a load of child support. Our national focus on child support undermined the balance of marriage. Now, feminists intend to use it to fully restructure marriage to become a feminist enterprise that is far more economically advantageous than heterosexual marriage.
When the divorce revolution began, folks thought it was just a blip and could not imagine a day when nearly half of children would be born outside marriage. No-fault divorce and excessive child support orders were thought to be just fine and dandy. Now that marriage has been largely wrecked, we must recognize that the structural model of same sex marriage is indeed pointing America towards social bedlam and a dangerous gender war the likes of which are unimaginable today.
Gay marriage is a feminist ruse to create a political-marital matriarchy. Two married women have at least 4 sources of income (their incomes and two sets of child support orders).
Feminists want to use the fact that children are considered chattel of mothers to boot men out of marriage and society. It is also their method for ending the structural problems of single mothers (they marry each other and have multiple incomes to support one roof). The 50% of children living absent marriage and fathers are intended to become 40% of children living in matriarchal marriages. The exloding illegitimacy numbers are intended to become exploding numbers of children born into matriarchal marriages.
Of course, in this scenario this country will become a very dangerous place to live when 40% of disaffected, detached men have nothing to do.
Every federal and state law is already in place to make this happen, except for the "right" for women to run this nation as a political matriarchy.
The CWA is asleep at the switch and does not understand the underlying feminist goals, which have always been to destroy heterosexual marriage and then re-align it as a feminist enterprise.
- 1
- 2
- Next »
See all 25 Comments