CBS Doc Dot Com

need to add title here

Integrating An Ounce Of Prevention

November 5, 2009 8:22 AM

Dr. Jon LaPook investigated Duke Integrative Medicine's non-traditional approach to preventing health issues before they happen. Duke believes this is the future of healthcare.

Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment
by CLWebber November 6, 2009 5:01 PM EST
Very informative. Thanks for sharing a few details on the research aspects. As a researcher in another discipline, I see the value of a systems approach such as integrated medicine as essential for incorporating the various components into a more realistic model of living systems. Although component research is vital, isn't the longterm goal to integrate the parts into the whole, to develop a comprehensive system for our lives?
Reply to this comment
by CLWebber November 6, 2009 5:00 PM EST
Very informative. Thanks for sharing a few details on the research aspects. As a researcher in another discipline, I see the value of a systems approach such as integrated medicine as essential for incorporating the various components into a more realistic model of living systems. Although component research is vital, isn't the longterm goal to integrate the parts into the whole, to develop a comprehensive system for our lives?
Reply to this comment
by KBuarotti November 6, 2009 10:59 AM EST
There have been 653 (Medline) peer reviewed, randomized controlled trials using acupuncture as a treatment. Numerous well-known meta-analysis have shown significant and clinically relevant effects of acupuncture on chronic pain, acute pain, and osteoarthritis.

One of the largest and most methodologically sound trials of acupuncture was conducted by Haake et al and published in the Arch Intern Med in 2007. It showed that acupuncture had a significant effect on pain. compared to sham acupuncture (placing needles in the wrong location).
1. Haake, M., Muller, H. H., Schade-Brittinger, C., Basler, H. D., Schafer, H., Maier, C., Endres, H. G., Trampisch, H. J., and Molsberger, A. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups. Arch Intern Med 9-24-2007;167(17):1892-1898.
Evidence: Haake et al. conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare verum acupuncture to sham acupuncture and guideline-based conventional therapy in patients with chronic low back pain (145). One thousand sixty two patients from 340 outpatient practices, aged 18-86 years (mean ± SD age, 50 ± 15 years) with a history of chronic low back pain for a mean length of eight years were included in the trial. Patients underwent ten 30-minute sessions of verum acupuncture, generally two sessions per week, (N=387) according to principles of traditional Chinese medicine; sham acupuncture (N=387) consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points; or conventional therapy, a combination of drugs, physical therapy, and exercise (N=388). Five additional sessions were offered to patients who had a partial response to treatment (10%-50% reduction in pain intensity). Primary outcome was response after six months, defined as 33% improvement or better on three pain-related items on the Von Korff Chronic Pain Grade Scale questionnaire or 12% improvement or better on the back-specific Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Patients who were nonblinded or had recourse to other than permitted concomitant therapies during follow-up were classified as nonresponders regardless of symptom improvement. At six months, response rate was 47.6% in the verum acupuncture group, 44.2% in the sham acupuncture group, and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. Differences among groups were as follows: verum vs. sham, 3.4% (95% confidence interval: -3.7% to 10.3%; p=0.39); verum vs. conventional therapy, 20.2% (95% confidence interval: 13.4-26.7%; p<0.001); and sham vs. conventional therapy, 16.8% (95% confidence interval: 10.1-23.4%; p<0.001).
Reply to this comment
by mja721 November 6, 2009 8:35 AM EST
There is evidence. Relying on western- reactionary medicine is a recipe for disaster. the more we embrace prevention and alternative medicine we'll have a healthier, more productive workforce. so what looks like pricey medicine saves lives, spirits and money
Reply to this comment
by matuliska November 5, 2009 3:04 PM EST
Wow. No evidence that any of those methods work at all. A waste of money, and likely dangerous. And anyone who dissagrees, please find me one peer reviewed study that shows that accupuncture or reiki works. Yes, people need to examine their lives to prevent rather than cure after the problem, but the methods she uses are worthless. Its a shame to tie all these snake oil salesmen into a logical practice.
Reply to this comment
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: