Washington Unplugged

need to add title here

Unplugged: Doctors Debate Health Reform

October 6, 2009 10:52 AM

Former AMA President Dr. Donald Palmisano and Dr. Mandy Krauthamer debate the Senate Finance Committee's health care plan. Plus; CBS News' Juan Zarate on President Obama and the Zazi terror case.

Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 12 Comments
by jab232 October 7, 2009 6:56 AM EDT
People (including doctors) are realizing how seriously flawed the present health insurance system is with its cost doubling every ten years and its abuses--rescission, pre-existing illness exclusions, huge deductibles and low caps on coverage for high premium insurance.

If you are insured, you will probably be paying double what you are now ten years from now, for less coverage. And you could well have your insurance canceled when you get an expensive illness.

A reputable study shows 45,000 died prematurely because of the present health insurance system (talk about death panels!) Reputable polls show majorities favor the public option, and one poll (New England Journal of Medicine) showed a large majority of the doctors polled favored the public option. More than half the personal bankruptcies in the U.S. are caused or complicated by medial costs.

So why such a struggle? The Republicans are the political arm of the billion-dollar health care and insurance industries. They are practicing their usual nasty, throwing everything they have at what would be good for ordinary people in order to protect the industry. And the Blue Dog Democrats are gutless.

To the Democrats, I say--Get off your duffs and pass a strong public option. That's what you were elected to do.
Reply to this comment
by truthskr17 October 6, 2009 11:40 PM EDT
I am truly scared that the govt will spend even more billions to "fix" a health care system that has flaws but is not broken. The AMA does not represent most doctors--go ahead and ask yours if he/she is an AMA member. Most docs are represented by their professional societies not the AMA. This leaves them fragmented so we get media reports from the Dr. Palmisano's of the world. I would like to see one story with the opinion of a Family MD from Grand Rapids, MI or a urologist from Bloomington, IN or a Pediatrician from Albany, NY.

"They" can do these few things as a start rather then imploding the system: 1). Allow individuals and/or small business owners to pool together into large groups and buy insurance. This will drive down costs. These pools should be national and offer wide varieties of coverage. It makes no sense for a healthy 23 year-old to spend for anything other than catastrophic coverage. A woman in her child bearing years may need OB care, etc. 2). No pre-existing illness exclusions 3). More govt funding for community health clinics that can operate as urgent care centers--my HMO makes me go to an urgent care center instead of the ER for after hours care. Its much cheaper, I have access, and it works. 4). Tort reform--duh, the docs order many more tests on the CYA principle--won't happen, unfortunately for the USA, as the trial lawyers control the Democratic Party. 5). Govt safety net for outliers--if you have a condition that requires a $4000/month medicine, that cost should be shared by every citizen.

This is just a start. Is this radical? tea bagging? partisan? or a small dose of common sense. It makes no sense to stuff another mammoth bill through when our currency is flailing and our national debt is expanding exponentially.
Reply to this comment
by tngreen October 6, 2009 7:57 PM EDT
I can't even listen to the rest of this video. It is not a real debate. There is no mention of HR 676, which calls for a national health insurance program (single payer). The public option is a red herring meant to look like reform but which is set up for failure from the start. Competing with private insurance, it will include a pool of the sickest patients and will bankrupt in short order. It is so obvious that Dr. Palmisano and his ilk are not working to protect patients, they are working to protect the insurance industry. Just watch this video. Listen to his words. He says NOTHING to indicate any concern for the welfare of patients. He wants us to have "choice." Who cares? I don't want "choices," I want access to affordable, high-quality health care. Looks like this is one physician who took the Hypocritic oath!
Reply to this comment
by skepticalJM October 6, 2009 7:45 PM EDT
Government run health care works; and sick people can finally get treated instead of over-treated or neglected. Competitive Health Care is another name for greed.
Reply to this comment
by brian1920 October 6, 2009 7:00 PM EDT
Socialized medicine means more incompetence, higher real costs and huge fraud in a government run mess. This is the reality of government operations. Obama is not serious because you have to address tort reform and cross state insurance purchases.
Reply to this comment
by kevjustice October 6, 2009 6:50 PM EDT
Universal health care is not socialisn. It is responsible capitalism.
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba October 6, 2009 5:52 PM EDT
Watch out what you say Doctors.
If you support public health care the neo nazi tea baggers will beat you up (or worse).
Reply to this comment
See all 12 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: