Are Coal Ash Products Safe?
October 1, 2009 11:50 AM
Coal ash, a byproduct of coal power plants, is being recycled in dozens of ways and used in products. How safe are these products? Lesley Stahl talks to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 14 Comments(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language)
COAL CUMBUSTION WASTE IS POISON!!!
YOU GOT THAT????
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5362297n
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5359991n
There are thousands of coal fly ash dump sites across the United States, mostly in rural and low income areas. Not surprisingly, these areas have higher than normal cancer, heart disease, and other chronic diseases. So, the ponds are only part of the story.
I truly am not all that interested in carbon emissions per se. What I am interested in is the pollution as a whole; air, water, ground, livestock and foodstuff farms.
And humans that have to breath all this pollution, or drink water that has been compromised by the pollution, or eating from their gardens or farms or selling these products to grocery store for others to ingest.
Sure, the newer coal plants have less pollution than the older plants ? but if you remember that old hemorrhoid relief commercial where they say while demonstrating with their hands, ?If THIS is your problem, THIS is no answer.?
And every new coal plant, particularly baseload power plants that are added, adds to the overwhelming problems already related to coal extraction, preparation and transportation, and of course the end result coal ash waste.
There are many waterways that are already injured and flow downstream to rivers and bays, like the Chesapeake Bay here in VA which is already struggling to get the pollution under control from years of lack of regard for what goes into it pollution wise from various industries.
And what of local water ways, like right near us in the Blackwater River system, that has mercury levels in many areas where you can?t eat fish more than once a week (if at all) due to the mercury content already in it ? before the new 1500 MW ODEC coal fired power plant is built and spewing even more pollution to add insult to injury.
As Elisa Young from Ohio noted above, Virginia isn?t alone in this battle. Many states are struggling with the clash between the health and welfare of their population, and the need and/or greed of money and power (both electrical and over people).
We really need to stop looking at the dollar signs and start looking at the telltale danger signs for the health and welfare of our people and our children, grandchildren and their children, and grandchildren -- The future!
You know, George Carlin was right when he said the problem isn?t the planet, the planet will do just fine ? it will just shake us off like a bad case of fleas and continue on it?s merry way ? it?s us I?m worried about! (forgive the paraphrase).
Yes, the world will continue either way ? we just might not be in the equation. Another species will rise up to take our irreverent and uncaring place.
No one is saying turn off the coal plants, except to upgrade them to better technologies. They are already with us and the current ones are needed to get us by for awhile. And for a hazardous material to be regulated as it should have been from the start.
However, we don?t need any NEW coal plants adding to the problem, what we need is the OLD ones upgraded to newer technology currently available AND ANY new facilities based on renewable sources.
I really feel for those areas in the country that are already feeling the affects of having coal plants so long near their homes, schools, water supplies and food sources due to these coal plants. I am saddened that it took me until now when they want to put a 1500 MW baseload coal fired power plant so close to our home, schools, water supply and farms/gardens to realize the dangers others have been facing for years -- from Mountain Top Removal to these coal fired plants around the country and around the world.
For complete disclosure, here is my connection to the coal industry:
I am a property owner/resident in the small 300+ Town of Dendron, in Surry County, VA where ODEC proposes to build a 1500 MW coal fired power plant. My Jim has a paralyzed right side diaphragm and is on an oxygen concentrator a minimum of 12 out of every 24 hours and struggles with Lyme Disease. Oxygen concentrators filter out nitrogen from the air to concentrate the oxygen, but doesn?t filter out anything else (pollutants in the air), and we will be well within the 1 mile stack shadow (as will EVERY SINGLE RESIDENT OF DENDRON AND OUR WATER SUPPLY). Not to mention, the wetlands close on two or three sides of the 1500 MW plant proposed. They actually had to move the plant CLOSER to the town to better 'protect' the wetlands. Well, what about the people that they moved it even closer to??!
We have been here for over 10 years and took a lot of time looking for and researching the area for a home that we could live in for the rest of our lives and sunk everything we had into it. There was NO mention in any papers about this area at that time that ODEC was even considering this plant in 1998, or I can tell you with a certainty that we would not have purchased here.
Looking at it from WV we are paying with the lives of our men and women in the mines, the land scaped and water that sustains our lives, the culture that is connected to the mountains that are being obliterated, the quality of the air we breath (near 4 million tons of blasting material a day in WV alone), we as a nation are giving up everything that sustains life to flip on the switch. Problem is... Its not ours to give!!! It belongs to our kids and grandkids. Money won't help if they live in a polluted land with polluted water and air. What are we thinking?? We have an obligation to clean this up and transition to a renewable energy future for our kids now before its to late!
We cannot continue to do this!
Just so we are clear.. Coal will never be clean and the dirtiest thing about it is the lies.
Noah
Dr. Powell: are you paid by the coal industry?
If so, would you say that you have a conflict of interest?
There are 500 coal ash sites around the U.S., and only a fraction (about 25%) have ANY groundwater monitoring AT ALL.
TVA said they were taken COMPLETELY by surprised by the coal ash spill. There are FOUR HUNDRED of these sites around the U.S.
Would you want your children to eat cattle that walks around all day on toxic coal ash? Would you want your children to live near a coal ash site, or to drink water contaminated with coal ash?
The natural gas industry said the same thing about hydraulic fracturing chemicals. "it's safe," said industry. Then when the EPA FINALLY -- FINALLY started TESTING almost one third of the wells tested were contaminated.
Are you trying to say that 130 MILLION tons/YEAR, dumped year after year after decade after decade, are NOT leaking into groundwater?
Thanks for the "other" side of the story -- now please have the decency, Dr. Powell, to tell us if you're paid by industry -- and how much you're paid.
Thank you.
Noah Bardwell
The problems pointed out by 60 Minutes tonight were created by improper engineering/use, not by the fly ash. Fly ash is not inherently "bad" nor does is all contain high levels of the many metals noted in the show tonight. In fact, the composition of coal fly ash is a function of the coal itself, it's origin, and mineralogy.
It is unfortunate that 60 Minutes chose to give only one side of the story.
It is true, coal (and the other fossil fuels) provide the majority of energy required to power our growing population. In developing countries, those that have large reserves of coal and little else, coal is dispropotionately important. Energy is the single most important commodity on Earth - "wise use of waste" is simply a methodology that must be adopted - we have no choice.
I don't know if the 60 Minute staff read these comments, but I would welcome the chance to tell the other side of the story.
Dr. Michael A. Powell, PhD
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 14 Comments