The Age of Megafires
September 6, 2009 4:20 PM
Global warming is increasing the intensity and number of forest fires across the American West. Scott Pelley goes to the fire line to report.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
September 6, 2009 4:20 PM
Global warming is increasing the intensity and number of forest fires across the American West. Scott Pelley goes to the fire line to report.
The Great Explorer, Part 1 14:13 November 29, 2009
Web Extra: Echoes of the Past 1:07 November 29, 2009
Web Extra: Finding Titanic 1:40 November 29, 2009
Web Extra: Trapped! 1:08 November 29, 2009
Web Extra: PT-109 1:17 November 29, 2009
B-Rex 13:54 November 15, 2009
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 37 CommentsI think it's more because those trees DIDN'T SURVIVE TO PROVIDE THIS GUY TREE RINGS IN THE 20TH CENTURY!
Then it's total conjecture that "half the forests will be gone within a century." Talk about blowing smoke! He provided no evidence to back this up, as it is totally preposterous.
Some comments made above about the restrictions on prescribed burns are absolutely right. Even the native Americans did controlled burns 200 years ago. The forests should NOT be "preserved", they should be MANAGED. If you cannot stand smoke, go back to the northeast and live there.
I viewed with great interest the feature titled? The Age of Megafires? on Sunday evening due to my experience and knowledge.
While ?Global Warming? may or may not be occurring (much evidence contradicts the claims of Global Warming believers of which I am not one), the main factor (the primary reason) was not discussed or even introduced!
That reason is due to the actions of a myriad of environmental groups being successful by either threatening or actually bringing legal actions (law suites) to stop most (virtually all) clearing of underbrush and removal or harvesting of dead trees within all but private owned forests.
In nearly all cases, the environmental groups have been successful in their actions. This is most often due to a fear by politicians to opposing these threats and claims for fear of large reprisal from the environmental groups when time for re-election arrives. This is the same situation whether involving local, state and/or federal agencies where it is very undesirable to be threatened, or worse, to actually to become defendants in these actions.
Until this fact is addressed and some common sense comes to the surface, we will continue to experience fires that are larger and more difficult to control and eventually extinguish.
The impact on human and animal life alone is immense not to mention the terrible losses in personal property and valuable forests and is in direct contradiction to the stated desires of these environmental groups.
This is a classic example of ?Stage One Thinking? in that they (the so-called environmentalists) have given no thought or nor any concern whatsoever to the consequences of their actions.
Frankly, as the ?winners? of these legal actions are paid by the defendants (in this case, YOU the taxpayers) and stand to earn untold large sums of money, they will neither consider or care of the real impact of their actions.
Look, I dont care that the scientific community waffles on whether eggs are good for you... or more importanly, their bogus that claim that in the '70s we were headed for an ice age (lets not forget, scientist dont get grants to investigate everything is ok) BUT if you want to make the pretentious case that humans are ******* up the planet, at least be honest.
Ive have watched my last 60 minutes episode. Something Ive done over my last 20 years. You should be ashamed. This is the first response I have ever been compelled to write.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 37 Comments