
Preview: The Fall of Lance Armstrong
January 25, 2013 3:30 PM
Armstrong confessed to doping in an interview with Oprah Winfrey last week, but U.S. Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart, says the evidence proves Lance Armstrong withheld the truth and lied to Winfrey on key issues. Watch Scott Pelley's report on Sunday, Jan. 27 at 7:00 p.m. ET/PT.
USADA CEO: Armstrong lied to Oprah



- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
See all 32 CommentsI was verifying these sports claims (probably the only one in the world) 15 years before Lance started doping. IT HAPPENS. ITS SAD when it gets to that level, (its also human nature). I have witnessed numerous fraudulent winning sport claims from hometown-locals (Stamford, Danbury, Hartford) to national level events. Even in golf, (maybe the highest integrity sport). Speaking out from the onset (very quietly) as no-one wanted to believe the opposite, with smoking gun facts, while continually chastised?
What is REALLY DEPLORABLE are the (officials, state regulators, politicians, agencys, people, partners etc) I have come in contact with, that KNEW & ignored the truth and THEN used these NON-compliant winners, looking the other way, "grabbing onto their coattails" per se, for PR & their OWN personal gain.
. . . Lance "manned up" . . . now they all have to be exposed (CT demanded to shut down our web site that listed these facts) (any 1st amendment lawyers out there?) . . . that will be MUCH LARGER STORY in the future as the names will be household
http://www.hole-in-won.com/HIOrule-breakers.htm
http://www.kevinkolenda.com
www.hole-in-won.com
It truly is Divine intervention that the world functions as well as it does with so many idiots in it that worry about so much that has to do with nothing.
I would agree that Armstrong is wrong to have done what he did - I, in no way defend him
I would agree that such behavior is probably much more rampant in this and other sports, than most realize
I would agree that doping is NOT justified
but....
I have somehow missed the "visual" on the truth and the exposure of his testing data. Seems to me that Tygart could solve the problem directly and support what appear so far to be "claims" by simply presenting the data he says shows Armstrong is lying.
Why, pray tell, is this not done? If it is cut and dried, it should be obvious. If it shows a trend, then it is suggestive. If it is unclear, Armstrong appears guilty until proven otherwise.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
See all 32 Comments