need to add title here

Secrets of the River

November 10, 2012 7:45 PM

A high school dancer and aspiring model is found dead. Did the killer videotape the murder? Peter Van Sant reports.

The search for Mackenzie Cowell's killer
Add a Comment See all 199 Comments
by theedrstrangelove May 29, 2013 7:27 AM EDT
Yes, this is one where we will never know.
Reply to this comment
by babbeemay May 23, 2013 8:41 AM EDT
I'm not sure if he is guilty or innocent, I can't call this one.
Reply to this comment
by bananabear2000 May 14, 2013 9:17 PM EDT
I do not like plea deals. it means a killer will be out in 14 years. So ya, people are safe for 14 years-until he gets out. Murderers should all be in jail for the rest of their life, period. They stole someone else's life, theirs should be gone too.

I believe he did it, and the blood proves that. I dont know anyone who would plead guilty to that if they werent guilty. Especially since they were making a plea deal and he knew they didnt have uch evidence-he knew he did it. Poor girl..so young and had everything to live for.
Reply to this comment
by bananabear2000 May 14, 2013 9:05 PM EDT
why do they keep listening to tha liz woman when she is clearly a complete pathological liar and admitted to lieing!
Reply to this comment
by SplittingHairs April 1, 2013 7:01 PM EDT
As others have mentioned, this show left out so much information that point to the guilt of both Chris and Tessa. Found the following text from a Seattle media website, a phone call from Tessa to her boyfriend hours after the murder, and a visit to an ex boyfriend a day or two after the murder.

"Schuyleman, 22, did make several calls to her boyfriend between 9:10 p.m. and 10:33 p.m, investigators said. During the first call, she told him, "SOMETHING REALLY BAD HAS HAPPENED.PLEASE PRAY FOR ME", according to the document. The boyfriend told detectives he was shocked by the comment as he knew Schuyleman to be "anti-religion." She later called back and said everything was fine, he said.

A former boyfriend of Schuyleman told police she stopped by his apartment some time between Feb. 9 and Feb. 11. She was acting "really (expletive) weird," and seemed "wierdly (sic) scared," the document said, and she told him she came to get some of her belongings, but did not do so."
Reply to this comment
by ipsofacto66 March 28, 2013 7:13 AM EDT
It's disgusting how the defense lawyer is able to accuse the police of planting evidence without even a shred of indicative evidence. It's a form of perjury that is readily allowed in the US courts.

2 pieces of DNA evidence linking him to the victim...the freak kid is guilty. But 15 years (probably much less for parole) is a slap on the wrist. His girlfriend probably belongs behind bars as well. That prosecutor was a marsh-mellow in offering any plea deals.
Reply to this comment
by JuliaPetite March 9, 2013 9:25 AM EST
He's a sick murderer. He should be in prison for the rest of his life.
Reply to this comment
by Hetaira3 February 7, 2013 8:23 AM EST
The key of this case is if the blood was planted on that floor or not. I don't think police or somebody else could plant the blood there. So how could the bloold be there? That's the point. If they haven't any relationship between them that's not possible. So we have to believe that they know each other........That means the guy is lying and if you lie in one point you can be liying in all. That's my opinion.
Reply to this comment
by TimCar35 February 4, 2013 2:54 AM EST
Pretty interesting psychology of all these folks jumping through ridiculous logical hurdles (police planting evidence at some random person's house, Chris as just some normal kid ignoring his music art choice of friends and tattoos, that people apparently zoom in on their carpet and take videos of people playing dead all the time, etc, etc, etc).

As an outsider that doesn't care too much, it's completely obvious that either Chris or Tessa, or both did it (and Tessa certainly knew about it, even if she wasn't directly involved). Some use of Occam's razor around here would be a nice change of pace. Or do they not have Occam's razor in Wenatchee? Which of these is more likely?

1. The weird guy with a blood stain on his floor, with extended videos of the floor where said bloodstain existed, with bizarre comments by his little satanic friend while videoing the floor and in other videos playing dead on the floor and then lying about it to the police, a guy who left like a minute from the school after McKenzie did, that sent barrages of text messages between himself and his little satanic friend (who was apparently freaked out over the next few days) while attempting to borrow cars all at the exact times that would've lined up with the murder ... might've actually killed the girl. Sometimes a duck is just a duck.

or is it more likely ...

2. The police decided to take amounts of a murder victim's blood and pour it on some random guy's floor, but only after magically looking into the future in order to know that the place they would pour it would also turn out to have been video-taped in very bizarre fashion by these random people they just picked.

Yeah, #2 sure sounds likely.

Just imagine if some of you bending over backwards to come up with "what if" scenarios that would cause Chris to be innocent, instead started bending over backwards to create "what if" scenarios to defend Budha or whoever these other guys were. Ya'll are taking by far the harder of the two choices. You're willing to believe every word of some drug addict informant like it's gospel from heaven, yet are willing to assume police officers are dumping blood in order to frame innocent people without giving a second thought.
Reply to this comment
by TimCar35 February 4, 2013 2:53 AM EST
Pretty interesting psychology of all these folks jumping through ridiculous logical hurdles (police planting evidence at some random person's house, Chris as just some normal kid ignoring his music art choice of friends and tattoos, that people apparently zoom in on their carpet and take videos of people playing dead all the time, etc, etc, etc).

As an outsider that doesn't care too much, it's completely obvious that either Chris or Tessa, or both did it (and Tessa certainly knew about it, even if she wasn't directly involved). Some use of Occam's razor around here would be a nice change of pace. Or do they not have Occam's razor in Wenatchee? Which of these is more likely?

1. The weird guy with a blood stain on his floor, with extended videos of the floor where said bloodstain existed, with bizarre comments by his little satanic friend while videoing the floor and in other videos playing dead on the floor and then lying about it to the police, a guy who left like a minute from the school after McKenzie did, that sent barrages of text messages between himself and his little satanic friend (who was apparently freaked out over the next few days) while attempting to borrow cars all at the exact times that would've lined up with the murder ... might've actually killed the girl. Sometimes a duck is just a duck.

or is it more likely ...

2. The police decided to take amounts of a murder victim's blood and pour it on some random guy's floor, but only after magically looking into the future in order to know that the place they would pour it would also turn out to have been video-taped in very bizarre fashion by these random people they just picked.

Yeah, #2 sure sounds likely.

Just imagine if some of you bending over backwards to come up with "what if" scenarios that would cause Chris to be innocent, instead started bending over backwards to create "what if" scenarios to defend Budha or whoever these other guys were. Ya'll are taking by far the harder of the two choices. You're willing to believe every word of some drug addict informant like it's gospel from heaven, yet are willing to assume police officers are dumping blood in order to frame innocent people without giving a second thought.
Reply to this comment
See all 199 Comments
Recent Shows