
Medical Marijuana: Will Colorado's "green rush" last?
October 21, 2012 4:30 PM
Denver, Colo., has more medical pot dispensaries than Starbucks, but the budding business, legal in 17 states, defies federal laws. Steve Kroft reports.
Medical Marijuana: Will Colorado's "green rush" last?
Web Extras
Scroll Left Scroll Right









- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
See all 68 Commentshttp://wh.gov/XXp9
Then you can tell all your friends you are "in" the medical marijuana industry and more importantly you can help sick patients get access to the same high potency cannabis they purchase now for less money than they pay today.
If it is not misused it can have substantial health benefits. For example, as noted on page 47 of "Marijuana Gateway to Health," Dachstar Press, San Francisco, 2011, the non-THC component of the plant "is a nontoxic and highly effective antagonist of breast cancer cells."
Substantial research on this has been done in Europe but little has been done in the US because marijuana has been classified as a schedule 1 drug similar to heroine.
The taxes on pot will make it unaffordable, forcing people to continue to buy it illegally; the Liquor Control Board having 100% control on who can grow it and sell it; DUI's will be given out based on unscientific blood tests; newly developed government and private businesses will profit from the taxes....not just the current gov programs; there will be unrealistic restrictions on the quantity of pot you're allowed to have...that's like saying you can't have more than 1 bottle of wine or six pack of beer in your home, etc.. This initiative is another form of prohibition.
A 25% sales tax will be imposed on the consumer, which is in addition to our current sales tax of around 8.9%....that puts it near 34%. But that is still after the grower is charged 25% on what they sell to the middle man-distributor, who then in turn sells it to the retailer, for another 25% tax. I can't imagine how much an ounce of pot will cost by the time it trickles down to the consumer. The commericals only state that we should be taxing the sale of pot, so our state will benefit, but of course leave out how much.
Under this initiative, an individual will only be allowed to buy or possess only 1 oz of marijuana, and no more than 1 pound of edibles. They say this initiative will be treated like our laws governing alcohol. I don't see any laws on the books that limits the amount of alcohol we can buy or possess. Again, that's like saying we can only have 1 bottle of wine, and no more then a six pack of beer! Any more than that, and we might be suspicious of having a distillery in our back yard and selling it in the black market. I guess the backers of this initiative are stereotyping the typical pot smoker as a dealer if they have 2 oz instead of 1. Again, another form of prohibition.
I don't encourage anyone to drive while impaired. The DUI enforcement for having a blood analysis of the person's THC concentration, will be based upon 5 nanograms per milliliter of whole blood. This has not been scientifically proven to show whether this impairs a person's ability to drive. Also, as most of us knows, marijuana can stay in a person's system for up to a month, and not be high or impaired.
The liquor control board will have full control of everything. Their cut for doing this, is to the tune of up to $1,250,000 dollars every year. The other revenue won't just go to current government programs, but to newly created government programs. Only a small portion will go to the state's general fund, once everyone else has gotten their cut. The liquor control board will have total control as to who can grow it, distribute it, and sell it. That's like telling Jack Daniels or Budweiser how to run their businesses and where they are allowed to sell it. They would lose any kind of profits if the government taxed their alcohol like they want to do with marijuana, along with the fact that the public would only be allowed to buy a small amount because of purchase and possession limitations. I-502 isn't treating the legalization of marijuana like our current alcohol laws. Again, this initiative is another form of prohibition.
If this initiative passes, there will be a string of law suits, until the wrongs are corrected. If it doesn't pass, there is already petitions being signed, in order for a new initiative to be presented to the citizens of Washington. We have waited this long for the legalization for Marijuana, another year or two to get it right, only makes sense. Let's truly end the prohibition of marijuana. I-502 isn't it.
"*unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"
By definition then, it already is legal. No?
Declaration of Independence
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
See all 68 Comments