need to add title here

Bank Of America

October 19, 2008 9:35 PM

Lesley Stahl speaks to bankers about the federal government coming to the aid of America?s biggest banks. Shachar Bar-On is the producer.

Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by happy2no October 22, 2008 6:41 PM EDT
If you are tired of the offers for a credit card then opt out for all offers then you will no longer be asked if you want a credit card period.
Reply to this comment
by stopoffers October 22, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
As a customer at BOA I have to say that I am sick of being offered a credit card each time i step foot in the door. The trouble with this economy is that people are living way beyond their means. Each time I (and most everyone) goes to the bank it is "can I offer you a credit card today?, Where do you have your credit cards?, What kind of credit cards do you use?, and the offers go on and on. I wish the push for credit offers would stop. If the public needs a card they will get a card, but don''t prey on the poor or the students or the elderly. I have seen it happen so many times in the local branches and it is a concern. Place your focus elsewhere.
Reply to this comment
by mpbryk October 22, 2008 11:14 AM EDT
here is a joke and a half...the credit card debtors are failing...so credit cards are raising their rates...duh...doesnt this sound just like the toxic waste in sub-prime lending?
Reply to this comment
by mpbryk October 22, 2008 11:06 AM EDT
when are these *** politicians gonna get smart and stop the foreclosures first...then sort it out?

instead, we just keep stuffing the pigs
Reply to this comment
by boaemployee October 22, 2008 1:28 AM EDT
To all those who have decided to take their anger out on Bank of America... To those who say Bank of America had something to do with the forclosure crisis... I would like to inform you... you are dead wrong. Bank of America was one of the few banks who decided not to use poor lending strategies such as, sub-prime loans (aka Negative Amortization loans) and did not push ARM loan (aka Adjustable Rate Mortgages) as much as other lenders. This is the reason they are still afloat and helping their customers retain their homes to the best of their abilities. I am proud to say I am a Bank of American. They are not going ANYWHERE anytime soon. So deal with it. That is why they are number 1!
Reply to this comment
by happy2no October 21, 2008 11:38 PM EDT
I just wanted to say that when people complain about bank''s, could it really be their fault that they got in trouble, that they spent money they didn''t have, borrowed money they couldn''t pay back. BOA is not a the enemy they have strived to become one of the strongest banks in the United States, we should be proud that they have acquired company''s that needed help.
Reply to this comment
by mscline2 October 21, 2008 3:30 PM EDT
I''ve been interested in reading all the negative comments about B of A. Bank of America is one of the few banks that has retained solvency during the financial crisis we are facing in America.

The clowns that lended money to families making $65K/annually and buying $800K+ houses in the Western part of the US should be held criminally liable and the people who bought those homes should have a brain scan. America was based upon a free market system--a system that is in peril at this point. It is not about borrowing what you want and walking away when it goes south.

As adults we are held accountable for what we legally sign; if you didn''t read the contract or understand lending then you shouldn''t have signed the paperwork until you were a more informed borrower.

Bank of America bought Countrywide after their loans were in default. A bold step and yes, a step that was based upon the opportunity to make money--a financial isntitution that makes money which is why they''re solvent--what a concept.

Those of us who have borrowed responsibly are now paying the economic price of higher cost of capital, diminishing returns on investments and a financially unstable economy because many of our fellow Americans made decisions based upon greed--from lenders and consumers. Please save your whining and complaining--we''re all paying the price for your poor judgement.
Reply to this comment
by kris1961 October 21, 2008 9:35 AM EDT
This was the most disgusting piece I think I''v seen so far. This man was made to look like a saint. BOA charges the most for atm fee''s. and I am sure other things. Let me tell you I have Countrywide as a mortgage co. Due to stupidity my rate is on the high side. Try to contact them. I will never go through a mortgage co again. They will not let me out of this for 5 years unless I pay a $5000 penalty. This guy was one of the problems not a saint by any means. I''m a case worker at the welfare dept..let him do my job for a week and make my pay..I can only hope it''s true that karma is a b-----:::::
Reply to this comment
by dacougs71 October 21, 2008 2:50 AM EDT
Funny how some people steriotype companies as they do people. I chose to relocate this spring before things really started falling apart. My home was the nicest in the neighborhood and was priced at the same level as other homes. It did not sell. As time went on we have dropped it from $274,950 down to $225,000. I am in the middle of trying to get a short sale approved finally, since I owe $267,000. I however know what happened and understand it is not the Bank''s fault. This is going to damage my credit, but it''s not the Bank''s fault. Buying a home has been called one''s biggest investment. Well guess what? If you had $267,000 in the stock market you''d have done worse than I did with my home. Now the Bank is likely going to take a loss on my investment! How is this the Bank''s fault? The Bank is likely going to save me from years of trying to dig out of this mess by writing off the difference. I wish others would see it the same way. Some lenders only cared about making their profit and selling the debt to someone else. Other lenders such as Bank of America are doing their best to help out homeowners in stress. I aplaud what some are doing! Bank of America is indeed working hard and taking losses for the "little people". In the end I hope they gain the loyalty and respect they deserve!
Reply to this comment
by research1st-2009 October 20, 2008 6:55 PM EDT
Previous comment was posted in response to verderosso (and those who might think like him/her).
Reply to this comment
by research1st-2009 October 20, 2008 6:53 PM EDT
You might try diverting your anger to those companies who are REALLY to blame for the economy. If you paid attention, BOA pulled out of sub-prime mortgages and therefore was NOT part of the problem.

ACTUALLY... here''s a better idea... be responsible and don''t bit off more than you can chew. The "majority" of people who are experiencing foreclosures are those who bought "too much" home and could barely afford it.

For those people buying irresponsibly and above their means... be responsible and save up first, so you can be sure to afford what you''re getting yourself into. Those who prepared themselves and made wise decisions aren''t in this mess.

For the company''s like BOA who are actively getting involved and trying to hold our economy together now...keep up the good work. And yes, I realize they are making a small profit, but why shouldn''t they if they are saving everyone else%u2019s tusshy?
Reply to this comment
by verderosso October 20, 2008 4:48 PM EDT
If anyone has any account with a bank such as Bank of "america" known to be involved in foreclosing people from their homes they should immediately close their accounts and open with a small community bank in their neighborhood as a protest. Rather than suicide and burning their own houses let''s take to the streets!
Reply to this comment
by verderosso October 20, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
How about reporting on Bank of "America" and its role in foreclosures?
Reply to this comment
by vonmeyer October 20, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
As you consider the elements of regulation and future monitoring of the mortgages and real estate credit in the U.S. one of the things you may want to consider is what role local government records and parcel information tracking could play in this effort. If we had a national system for standardizing the availability of current parcel information regulators could know state-by-state, county-by-county and mortgage-by-mortgage what was happening with financing and mortgage payments.

A recently completed study by the National Academy of Sciences lays out some recommendations on how this could be accomplished. Additionally the Federal Geographic Data Committee%u2019s Cadastral Subcommittee has been tracking and studying this for years. It is possible to have the elements for monitoring and tracking the status of this important parcel level information nationwide for around 400 million. Additionally it would be possible to build in a small per mortgage fee that could go to counties to keep this system continually funded.

If you would like to know more about this I would be happy to discuss the details and some potential approaches as well as some examples of successful existing approaches being used across the country.
Reply to this comment
by sailndad October 20, 2008 12:47 PM EDT
I live near Charlotte and have always taken a lot of pride in the world class of the banks here. Thanks for the fascinating and well done piece. But I''m compelled to point out that I have been totally unable to do business with BOA. It is much like doing business with the enemy, as they are like lions in the tall grass, just waiting to pounce on you. You wouldn''t believe what they did to my daughter, a college student, with a checking account and a credit card. So while I''m proud of the status they bring to Charlotte, I do all my business with the tiny local bank.
Reply to this comment
by franktakesh October 20, 2008 3:23 AM EDT
Itresting
Reply to this comment
by david_ryeburn October 20, 2008 2:40 AM EDT
This is for your webmaster.

Until today I could expand to full screen. Today I tried, but was told I needed Flash 9.0.something or higher. I''m now using the new Flash 10.0.12 so you reject me because you probably think that''s Flash 1 instead of Flash 10. Lots of us have upgraded to Flash 10 for security reasons. You should fix this by allowing Flash 10. I don''t want to downgrade because of security concerns. By the way, the NY Times video feeds work fine for full screen with Flash 10, so it *CAN* be done. Just check for more than merely the first digit of the Flash version.

David, retired mathematician with over 20 years of computer experience.
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
  • Stealing A Movie Stealing A Movie

    1:57 November 1, 2009

  • Fighting Back Fighting Back

    1:26 November 1, 2009

  • Hard Time Hard Time

    1:41 October 4, 2009

  • Marc Dreier: The Swindler Marc Dreier: The Swindler

    13:10 October 4, 2009

  • The Liquidator The Liquidator

    13:03 September 27, 2009

  • Madoff's Missing Millions Madoff's Missing Millions

    1:17 September 27, 2009