-
Rooney on Thanksgiving November 22, 2009 10:25 AM
-
60 Minutes, 11.22.09 November 22, 2009 10:45 AM
-
James Cameron's Avatar November 22, 2009 10:15 AM
-
Maziar Bahari: Witness November 22, 2009 10:07 AM
-
The Cost of Dying November 22, 2009 10:06 AM
-
Web Extra: At Home, At Peace November 22, 2009 9:47 AM
-
Web Extra: Comfort and Costs November 22, 2009 9:44 AM
-
Extra: "A Peaceful Terrorist" November 22, 2009 9:44 AM
-
Extra: "Mr. Hillary Clinton" November 22, 2009 9:36 AM
-
Web Extra: A Defining Moment? November 22, 2009 9:32 AM
-
Web Extra: Target Audience? November 22, 2009 9:32 AM
-
Web Extra: His High-Tech Cave November 22, 2009 9:24 AM
-
Preview: Witness November 21, 2009 5:05 AM
-
Preview: The Cost of Dying November 20, 2009 11:47 AM
-
Preview: Cameron's "Avatar" November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
-
On The Set of "Avatar" November 19, 2009 10:34 AM
-
Kroft's Reporter's Notebook November 19, 2009 11:39 AM
-
60 Minutes, 11.15.09 November 15, 2009 4:58 PM
-
Rooney on U.S. Citizenship November 15, 2009 4:57 PM
-
Resurrecting Eden November 15, 2009 4:53 PM
It is very clear to me and to millions of other Americans that the future of this great country depends upon freeing ourselves from foreign oil. Electric cars, energy efficient homes and renewable sources are sure ways to achieve this very reachable goal.
John McEwan
Alexandria, VA
VW Jetta TDI is rated 40 mpg freeway. That translates into 250 g of CO2 per mile.
Tesla uses around 300 wh per mile. GM EV-1 used 200-250 wh. Aptera will use around 100 wh. I don''t have numbers for Volt. The most recent estimate of greenhouse gas emissions for California is 275 g/kwh. (And it''s dated 2000, today it''s even lower) That equals 28 g of CO2 per mile for Aptera and 83 g of CO2 per mile for Tesla.
And even if you use nationwide averages (California has cleaner electricity than most states), Tesla still comes out lower on emissions than TDI.
The reality is that burning coal under tightly controlled conditions in a plant is far more efficient than burning diesel in an internal combustion engine. Diesel engines only achieve about 40% efficiency, gasoline engines are lucky to get 30%.
VW Jetta TDI is rated 40 mpg freeway. That translates into 250 g of CO2 per mile.
Tesla uses around 300 wh per mile. GM EV-1 used 200-250 wh. Aptera will use around 100 wh. I don''t have numbers for Volt. The most recent estimate of greenhouse gas emissions for California is 275 g/kwh. (And it''s dated 2000, today it''s even lower) That equals 28 g of CO2 per mile for Aptera and 83 g of CO2 per mile for Tesla.
And even if you use nationwide averages (California has cleaner electricity than most states), Tesla still comes out lower on emissions than TDI.
The reality is that burning coal under tightly controlled conditions in a plant is far more efficient than burning diesel in an internal combustion engine. Diesel engines only achieve about 40% efficiency, gasoline engines are lucky to get 30%.
You really missed the boat on that piece. You never asked the important question. If a gallon of gas us used to generate electricity and charge the car how far would it go compared with just putting the gas in the car directly? That is the test, the only advantage of an electric car is that it doesn%u2019t pollute where it operates, but it does pollute at the power plant were the electricity is being generated. My bet is that if you really investigate this you will fine that if you use say diesel to generate electricity and account for all the inefficiencies the step up and down losses and the power line loses and the losses from charging a battery, power in, power out, the amount of fuel the electric car consumes is enormous. This doesn%u2019t even account for the pollution efficiencies of the two places the gas or diesel is being burned. I think you will fined the diesel engine of say a VW Tdi pollutes less with its gallon of diesel than any commercial power plant you might burn it in and change your electric car. So your silicon guys may in the end be dead wrong, like they were when their so-called clean industry polluted all the ground waters of the Santa Clara Valley.
Scott
Houston Tx.
You really missed the boat on that piece. You never asked the important question. If a gallon of gas us used to generate electricity and charge the car how far would it go compared with just putting the gas in the car directly? That is the test, the only advantage of an electric car is that it doesn%u2019t pollute where it operates, but it does pollute at the power plant were the electricity is being generated. My bet is that if you really investigate this you will fine that if you use say diesel to generate electricity and account for all the inefficiencies the step up and down losses and the power line loses and the losses from charging a battery, power in, power out, the amount of fuel the electric car consumes is enormous. This doesn%u2019t even account for the pollution efficiencies of the two places the gas or diesel is being burned. I think you will fined the diesel engine of say a VW Tdi pollutes less with its gallon of diesel than any commercial power plant you might burn it in and change your electric car. So your silicon guys may in the end be dead wrong, like they were when their so-called clean industry polluted all the ground waters of the Santa Clara Valley.
Scott
Houston Tx.