Utah theater fined for showing "Hangover II"

Some things don't mix, at least in Utah - like R-rated comedies that depict nudity ("The Hangover Part II") and establishments that serve alcohol. / Warner Brothers
SALT LAKE CITY - A Utah movie theater that serves liquor has been fined more than $1,600 for showing "The Hangover Part II."
The fine issued by the state liquor board Thursday is the first for Brewvies, which only allows people 21 years and older to attend their movies and serves food and liquor to patrons. But under state law, many PG-13 and R-rated movies could net the theater a fine because of prohibitions on showing a film with sex acts, full-frontal nudity or even the "caressing" of breasts or buttocks.
While the fine for the first offense was $1,627, repeat offenders may be fined up to $25,000 and lose their liquor license for up to 10 days.
The law is generally used to regulate strip clubs, which aren't permitted to have nude dancers G-strings and pasties are required to be worn if they serve liquor. The law is applied only to businesses with liquor licenses, so it wouldn't apply to alcohol-free theaters.
Utah Highway Patrol officers issued the citation against Brewvies in early September after a complaint was filed with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
The movie was in violation because of multiple scenes, patrol spokesman Dwayne Baird said. "Hangover II" includes full-frontal nudity from male, female and transvestite characters and also has a scene showing a monkey simulating a sex act on a monk.
Brewvies manager Andy Murphy told The Salt Lake Tribune they have always complied with the state's liquor laws, and "don't want to shake up anything."
Brewvies got a state liquor license in 2009 that allowed patrons to have wine and mixed drinks. The theater has been open since 1997, but served lower-alcohol beers that only required approval by the city government.
The liquor board established the fine amount for such violations, and there wasn't leeway in the amount for Brewvies, department director Francine Giani said, adding that she's planning to urge the board to revisit their fine schedule.
Popular in Entertainment
- Amanda Bynes 20 Photos
- Amanda Bynes arrested on bong-related counts
- Amanda Bynes in court for possession of marijuana Play Video
- Snooki: N.J. Gov. Christie "just doesn't like us"
- Ray Manzarek remembered by Doors bandmates, rockers
- Stone Temple Pilots sue its former singer
- Amanda Bynes charged in NYC in accused bong toss
- "Arrested Development" returns: Will you binge-watch?













Yeah! +1 to Sarge.
----
Thank you, Sir.
Yes, I am. Do you think the smut in movies and on TV is what founding fathers had in mind when they supported freedom of speech?
----
I think what they had in mind was inhibiting the influence of your type of thinking on society as a whole - being that a certain group feels empowered for some bizarre reason to believe they should decide for any and all what will and won't be seen.
That's what I think.
And indeed 1perish, Franklin would have LOVED Brewvies, add prostitutes, and it would have been heaven!
People seem to forget that sex has been around since the beginning of time. It's only been in a minuscule sample of human history that we have become ashamed & embarrassed of it, and only in certain areas where select belief systems have suppressed it.
We gasp at Muslim nations and their rules for women, yet we have similar rules based upon similar theologies.
The monmons... They are the reason I will not attend church.
---
The reason I will not is because I subscribe to science, not myth, magic, and mysticism.
As well, I am not here to spend my life in servitude to invisible beings in invisible places.
Obedience to invisible beings in invisible places.
Incredible.
You mean someone actually thought a movie was too filthy to show to everyone? Amazing---I see from some comments that the dregs are really upset with this decision. Too bad other states don't do the same
---
You REALLY want the state deciding what movies will and won't be shown?
Are you serious?
Question. Would a clothed person showing genitalia cause a fine? That wasn't mentioned in the breakdown above.