By

Sandy Tolan /

TomDispatch/ September 23, 2011, 2:24 AM

It's the occupation, stupid

A Palestinian and UN flag flutter outside a souvenirs shop in Gaza City as part of the campaign promoting the Palestinians' bid for statehood on September 14, 2011.

A Palestinian and UN flag flutter outside a souvenirs shop in Gaza City as part of the campaign promoting the Palestinians' bid for statehood on September 14, 2011. / MAHMUD HAMS/AFP/Getty Images

It's the show that time and the world forgot. It’s called the Occupation and it’s now in its 45th year.

Playing on a landscape about the size of Delaware, it remains largely hidden from view, while Middle Eastern headlines from elsewhere seize the day.  Diplomats shuttle back and forth from Washington and Brussels to Middle Eastern capitals; the Israeli-Turkish alliance ruptures amid bold declarations from the Turkish prime minister; crowds storm the Israeli Embassy in Cairo, while Israeli ambassadors flee the Egyptian capital and Amman, the Jordanian one; and of course, there’s the headliner, the show-stopper of the moment, the Palestinian Authority's campaign for statehood in the United Nations, which will prompt an Obama administration veto in the Security Council.

But whatever the Turks, Egyptians, or Americans do, whatever symbolic satisfaction the Palestinian Authority may get at the U.N., there’s always the Occupation and there -- take it from someone just back from a summer living in the West Bank -- Israel isn’t losing.  It’s winning the battle, at least the one that means the most to Palestinians and Israelis, the one for control over every square foot of ground.  Inch by inch, meter by meter, Israel's expansion project in the West Bank and Jerusalem is, in fact, gaining momentum, ensuring that the “nation” that the U.N. might grant membership will be each day a little smaller, a little less viable, a little less there.

How to disappear a land

On my many drives from West Bank city to West Bank city, from Ramallah to Jenin, Abu Dis to Jericho, Bethlehem to Hebron, I'd play a little game: Could I travel for an entire minute without seeing physical evidence of the occupation?  Occasionally -- say, when riding through a narrow passage between hills -- it was possible.  But not often.  Nearly every panoramic vista, every turn in the highway revealed a Jewish settlement, an Israeli army checkpoint, a military watchtower, a looming concrete wall, a barbed-wire fence with signs announcing another restricted area, or a cluster of army jeeps stopping cars and inspecting young men for their documents.

The ill-fated Oslo "peace process" that emerged from the Oslo Accords of 1993 not only failed to prevent such expansion, it effectively sanctioned it.  Since then, the number of Israeli settlers on the West Bank has nearly tripled to more than 300,000 -- and that figure doesn’t include the more than 200,000 Jewish settlers in East Jerusalem.

The Oslo Accords, ratified by both the Palestinians and the Israelis, divided the West Bank into three zones -- A, B, and C.  At the time, they were imagined by the Palestinian Authority as a temporary way station on the road to an independent state.  They are, however, still in effect today.  The de facto Israeli strategy has been and remains to give Palestinians relative freedom in Area A, around the West Bank’s cities, while locking down "Area C" -- 60% of the West Bank -- for the use of the Jewish settlements and for what are called "restricted military areas."  (Area B is essentially a kind of grey zone between the other two.)  From this strategy come the thousands of demolitions of "illegal" housing and the regular arrests of villagers who simply try to build improvements to their homes.  Restrictions are strictly enforced and violations dealt with harshly.

When I visited the South Hebron Hills in late 2009, for example, villagers were not even allowed to smooth out a virtually impassable dirt road so that their children wouldn't have to walk two to three miles to school every day. Na’im al-Adarah, from the village of At-Tuwani, paid the price for transporting those kids to the school "illegally." A few weeks after my visit, he was arrested and his red Toyota pickup seized and destroyed by Israeli soldiers.  He didn't bother complaining to the Palestinian Authority -- the same people now going to the U.N. to declare a Palestinian state -- because they have no control over what happens in Area C.

The only time he'd seen a Palestinian official, al-Adarah told me, was when he and other villagers drove to Ramallah to bring one to the area.  (The man from the Palestinian Authority refused to come on his own.) "He said this is the first time he knew that this land [in Area C] is ours.  A minister like him is surprised that we have these areas?  I told him, 'How can a minister like you not know this?  You're the minister of local government!'

"It was like he didn't know what was happening in his own country," added al-Adarah.  "We're forgotten, unfortunately."

The Israeli strategy of control also explains, strategically speaking, the “need” for the network of checkpoints; the looming separation barrier (known to Israelis as the "security fence" and to Palestinians as the "apartheid wall") that divides Israel from the West Bank (and sometimes West Bankers from each other); the repeated evictions of Palestinians from residential areas like Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem; the systematic revoking of Jerusalem IDs once held by thousands of Palestinians who were born in the Holy City; and the labyrinthine travel restrictions which keep so many Palestinians locked in their West Bank enclaves.

While Israel justifies most of these measures in terms of national security, it’s clear enough that the larger goal behind them is to incrementally take and hold ever more of the land.  The separation barrier, for example, has put 10% of the West Bank’s land on the Israeli side -- a case of "annexation in the guise of security," according to the respected Israeli human rights group, B'tselem.

Taken together, these measures amount to the solution that the Israeli government seeks, one revealed in a series of maps drawn up by Israeli politicians, cartographers, and military men over recent years that show Palestine broken into isolated islands (often compared to South African apartheid-era "bantustans") on only about 40% of the West Bank.  At the outset of Oslo, Palestinians believed they had made a historic compromise, agreeing to a state on 22% of historic Palestine -- that is, the West Bank and Gaza.  The reality now is a kind of "ten percent solution," a rump statelet without sovereignty, freedom of movement, or control of its own land, air, or water. Palestinians cannot even drill a well to tap into the vast aquifer beneath their feet.

Living amid checkpoints, roadblocks, and night raids

Almost always overlooked in assessments of this ruinous "no-state solution" is the human toll it takes on the occupied. More than on any of my dozen previous journeys there, I came away from this trip to Palestine with a sense of the psychic damage the military occupation has inflicted on every Palestinian.  None, no matter how warm-hearted or resilient, escape its effects.

"The soldier pointed to my violin case.  He said, 'What's that?'" 13-year-old Alá Shelaldeh, who lives in old Ramallah, told me.  She is a student at Al Kamandjati (Arabic for “the violinist”), a music school in her neighborhood (which will be a focus of my next book). She was recalling a time three years earlier when a van she was in, full of young musicians, was stopped at an Israeli checkpoint near Nablus. They were coming back from a concert.  "I told him, 'It's a violin.'  He told me to get out of the van and show him."  Alá stepped onto the roadside, unzipped her case, and displayed the instrument for the soldier.  "Play something," he insisted.  Alá played "Hilwadeen” (Beautiful Girl), the song made famous by the Lebanese star Fayrouz.  It was a typical moment in Palestine, and one she has yet to, and may never, forget.

It is impossible, of course, to calculate the long-term emotional damage of such encounters on children and adults alike, including on the Israeli soldiers, who are not immune to their own actions.

Humiliation at checkpoints is a basic fact of West Bank Palestinian life.  Everyone, even children, has his or her story to tell of helplessness, fear, and rage while waiting for a teenaged soldier to decide whether or not they can pass.  It has become so normal that some kids have no idea the rest of the world doesn't live like this. "I thought the whole world was like us -- they are occupied, they have soldiers," remembered Alá's older brother, Shehade, now 20.

At 15, he was invited to Italy.  "It was a shock for me to see this life.  You can go very, very far, and no checkpoint.  You see the land very, very far, and no wall.  I was so happy, and at the same time sad, you know?  Because we don't have this freedom in my country."

At age 12, Shehade had seen his cousin shot dead by soldiers during the second intifada, which erupted in late 2001 after Israel's then-opposition leader Ariel Sharon paid a provocative visit to holy sites in the Old City of Jerusalem.  Clashes erupted as youths hurled stones at soldiers. Israeli troops responded with live fire, killing some 250 Palestinians (compared to 29 Israeli deaths) in the first two months of the intifada. The next year, Palestinian factions launched waves of suicide bombings in Israel.

One day in 2002, Shehade recalled, with Ramallah again fully occupied by the Israeli army, the young cousins broke a military curfew in order to buy bread.  A shot rang out near a corner market; Shehade watched his cousin fall.  This summer Shehada showed me the gruesome pictures -- blood flowing from a 12-year-old's mouth and ears -- taken moments after the shooting in 2002.

Nine years later, Ramallah, a supposedly sovereign enclave, is often considered an oasis in a desert of occupation.  Its streets and markets are choked with shoppers, and its many trendy restaurants rival fine European eateries.  The vibrancy and upscale feel of many parts of the city give you a sense that -- much as Palestinians are loathe to admit it – this, and not East Jerusalem, is the emerging Palestinian capital.

Many Ramallah streets are indeed lined with government ministries and foreign consulates.  (Just don't call them embassies!)  But much of this apparent freedom and quasi-sovereignty is illusory.  In the West Bank, travel without hard-to-get permits is often limited to narrow corridors of land, like the one between Ramallah and Nablus, where the Israeli military has, for now, abandoned its checkpoints and roadblocks.  Even in Ramallah -- part of the theoretically sovereign Area A -- night incursions by Israeli soldiers are common.

"It was December 2009, the 16th I think, at 2:15, 2:30 in the morning," recalled Celine Dagher, a French citizen of Lebanese descent. Her Palestinian husband, Ramzi Aburedwan, founder of Al Kamandjati, where both of them work, was then abroad.  "I was awakened by a sound," she told me.  She emerged to find the front door of their flat jammed partway open and kept that way by a small security bar of the sort you find in hotel rooms.

Celine thought burglars were trying to break in and so yelled at them in Arabic to go away.  Then she peered through the six-inch opening and spotted 10 Israeli soldiers in the hallway.  They told her to stand back, and within seconds had blown the door off its hinges.  Entering the apartment, they pointed their automatic rifles at her.  A Palestinian informant stood near them silently, a black woolen mask pulled over his face to ensure his anonymity. 

The commander began to interrogate her. "My name, with whom I live, starting to ask me about the neighbors." Celine flashed her French passport and pleaded with them not to wake up her six-month-old, Hussein, sleeping in the next room. "I was praying that he would just stay asleep." She told the commander, "I just go from my house to my work, from work to my house."  She didn't really know her neighbors, she said.

As it happened, the soldiers had blown off the door of the wrong flat.  They would remove four more doors in the building that night, Celine recalled, before finding their suspect: her 17-year-old next door neighbor.  "They stood questioning him for maybe 20 minutes, and then they took him.  And I think he's still in jail.  His father is already in jail."

According to Israeli Prison Services statistics cited by B'tselem, more than 5,300 Palestinians were in Israeli prisons in July 2011.  Since the beginning of the occupation in 1967, an estimated 650,000 to 700,000 Palestinians have reportedly been jailed by Israel.  By one calculation, that represents 40% of the adult-male Palestinian population.  Almost no family has been untouched by the Israeli prison system.

Celine stared through the blinds at the street below, where some 15 jeeps and other military vehicles were parked.  Finally, they left with their lights out and so quietly that she couldn't even hear their engines.  When the flat was silent again, she couldn't sleep.  "I was very afraid."  A neighbor came upstairs to sit with her until the morning.

Stories like these -- and they are legion -- accumulate, creating the outlines of what could be called a culture of occupation.  They give context to a remark by Saleh Abdel-Jawad, dean of the law school at Birzeit University near Ramallah: "I don't remember a happy day since 1967," he told me.  Stunned, I asked him why specifically that was so.  "Because,” he replied, “you can't go to Jerusalem to pray.  And it's only 15 kilometers away.  And you have your memories there.”

He added, “Since 17 years I was unable to go to the sea. We are not allowed to go. And my daughter married five years ago and we were unable to do a marriage ceremony for her." Israel would not grant a visa to Saleh's Egyptian son-in-law so that he could enter the West Bank.  "How to do a marriage without the groom?"

A Musical Intifada

An old schoolmate of mine and now a Middle East scholar living in Paris points out that Palestinians are not just victims, but actors in their own narrative.  In other words, he insists, they, too, bear responsibility for their circumstances -- not all of this rests on the shoulders of the occupiers.  True enough.

As an apt example, consider the morally and strategically bankrupt tactic of suicide bombings, carried out from 2001 to 2004 by several Palestinian factions as a response to Israeli attacks during the second intifada.  That disastrous strategy gave cover to all manner of Israeli retaliation, including the building of the separation barrier.  (The near disappearance of the suicide attacks has been due far less to the wall -- after all, it isn't even finished yet -- than to a decision on the part of all the Palestinian factions to reject the tactic itself.)

So, yes, Palestinians are also "actors" in creating their own circumstances, but Israel remains the sole regional nuclear power, the state with one of the strongest armies in the world, and the occupying force -- and that is the determining fact in the West Bank.  Today, for some Palestinians living under the 44-year occupation simply remaining on the land is a kind of moral victory.  This summer, I started hearing a new slogan: "Existence is resistance." If you remain on the land, then the game isn't over.  And if you can bring attention to the occupation, while you remain in place, so much the better.

In June, Alá Shelaldeh, the 13-year-old violinist, brought her instrument to the wall at Qalandia, once a mere checkpoint separating Ramallah and Jerusalem, and now essentially an international border crossing with its mass of concrete, steel bars, and gun turrets.  The transformation of Qalandia -- and its long, cage-like corridors and multiple seven-foot-high turnstiles through which only the lucky few with permits may cross to Jerusalem -- is perhaps the most powerful symbol of Israel's determination not to share the Holy City.

Alá and her fellow musicians in the Al Kamandjati Youth Orchestra came to play Mozart and Bizet in front of the Israeli soldiers, on the other side of Qalandia’s steel bars.  Their purpose was to confront the occupation through music, essentially to assert: we're here.  The children and their teachers emerged from their bus, quickly set up their music stands, and began to play.  Within moments, the sound of Mozart’s Symphony No. 6 in F Major filled the terminal.

Palestinians stopped and stared.  Smiles broke out.  People came closer, pulling out cell phones and snapping photos, or just stood there, surrounding the youth orchestra, transfixed by this musical intifada.  The musicians and soldiers were separated by a long row of blue horizontal bars.  As the music played on, a grim barrier of confinement was momentarily transformed into a space of assertive joy. "It was," Alá would say later, "the greatest concert of my life."

As the Mozart symphony built -- Allegro, Andante, Minuet, and the Allegro last movement -- some of the soldiers started to take notice.  By the time the orchestra launched into Georges Bizet’s Dance Boheme from Carmen #2, several soldiers appeared, looking out through the bars. For the briefest of moments, it was hard to tell who was on the inside, looking out, and who was on the outside, looking in.

If existence is resistance, if children can confront their occupiers with a musical intifada, then there's still space, in the year of the Arab Spring, for something unexpected and transformative to happen.  After all, South African apartheid collapsed, and without a bloody revolution. The Berlin Wall fell quickly, completely, unexpectedly.  And with China, India, Turkey and Brazil on the rise, the United States, its power waning, will not be able to remain Israel's protector forever. Eventually, perhaps, the world will assert the obvious: the status quo is unacceptable.

For the moment, whatever happens in the coming weeks at the U.N., and in the West Bank in the aftermath, isn’t it time for the world’s focus to shift to what is actually happening on the ground?  After all, it's the occupation, stupid.

Bio: Sandy Tolan is author of The Lemon Tree: An Arab, a Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East.  He is associate professor at the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California.  He is at work on a new book, Operation Mozart, about music and life in Palestine.  He blogs at ramallahcafe.com.This piece originally appeared on TomDispatch. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

© 2011 TomDispatch
25 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
morris2196 says:
This article is one-sided. It fails to say that the Israelis have good reasons for their military control over the West bank: to prevent the West bank from being used as staging areas for attacks on Israel, and to protect the Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
knucklecheese says:
This entire "occupation" concept is based on the completely false notion that the "Palestinian" people ever had a legitimate claim to that in the first place! This isn't their homeland. They were thrown out of their homelands! They are exiles from other nations who ended up wandering around in that area because they had nowhere else to go. Do you think the homeless bums who occasionally wander into unoccupied private property here in the US can lay claim to those houses?! Of course not! It's the exact same thing.
reply
baf827 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Israel and Palestintine are interchangabe in your post ; the Jews/Isralies also were an exiled people thrown out from other nations and wandering looking for a people whose land they could steal until the US, after WWII decided it would be in our best interest longterm to give them the palestinians' land to exist as a adjuant military power in the Middle East to protect the oil under the sands the US wanted. As for Temples, was it
not the Temples the MONEYCHANGERS were thrown from.
nott


not the Temples the MONEYCHANGERS
linkicon reporticon emailicon
askagain says:
PVperson2

Nazi's, the Israeli's have become Nazi's.

------------------------------------------------------------

Think now. The NAZIS were agressive attacking country after country. On the other hand, Israel was attacked by the Arabs as soon as it became a country and many times after that. Palestine lost its land to Israel. Palestine is not sincere about peace with Israel. Israel must do what is necessary to secure its borders. Your comparison of Israel to Nazis is convoluted, irrational, and historically incorrect.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slappy-mcjohnson says:
by Achimaatz
Why aren't the Palestinians able to settle in any one of the dozen or so surrounding Arab/Muslim countries that, by the way, eclipse Israel many times over in land mass?

----------

Not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

One word: Jerusalem. It's just as sacred to the Muslims as it is the Christians.
reply
Achimaatz replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, Slappy, the Muslim "sacred" presence in Jerusalem is an attempt to keep the 2nd Jewish Temple from being constructed. The "Dome of the Rock" is built on top of the remains of the first Jewish Temple. That is where the second temple will be.
askagain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Palestinians have been thrown out of a number of Arab countries which offered to host them. They were found to be undesirable wherever they went. Don't believe it. Look it up.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
saucymugwump says:
Mozart's 6th symphony was written when he was 10-11 and is not regarded by anyone as one of his better ones. Perhaps it was actually #36, his "Linz" symphony?
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Palestinian learning Western music is a first for me. Did not think their culture would allow that. learned something new. Do you think they will tour in Europe and the USA any time soon?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
woozybarnes says:
Every American citizen should be required to read this article. We are Bush to Israel's Cheney. Israel calls the tune for the US and no one knows that better than Israel. (Saddam's scuds couldn't reach the US but they could reach Israel.) We responded as ordered. My God, what have we become?
reply
Henri_Rochard replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As long as U.S. politicians, Dems and Repubs alike, pander for Jewish votes at election time, Israel will call the shots.

It's as simple as that.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Achimaatz says:
OK, so called Judeo-Christian founded United States, what does the Bible say are the boundaries that G_d established to be Israel? Does the Bible say anything about a Philistine (aka Palestinian) State within these boundaries? Israel, as a sovereign nation, has the right, authority and responsibility to enforce its borders. The United States demands as much for itself, why is the whole world allowed to bully Israel? Why aren't the Palestinians able to settle in any one of the dozen or so surrounding Arab/Muslim countries that, by the way, eclipse Israel many times over in land mass? Because the Palestinians are fighting the proxy war of those Arab/Muslim countries for the destruction and removal of Israel. Americans say "G_d bless America," but this country does nothing to earn any blessings. When the United States sides with the enemies of Israel G_d will not only cease His blessing, He will curse it. The lack of G_d's blessing is already obvious. The United States hasn't seen the curse, yet.
reply
quatermass2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Welcome to the 21st century. The founders were mostly Deists. Jeffersson made his OWN bible. And what does a book of fairy tales have to do with military occupation of foreign soil? Why do the Isarelis feel it's necessary to bulldoze people's homes. steal their farms and water, and put up barricades everywhere? If Israel thinks the land IS theirs, why don't they just go ahead and annex it? The answer to the last question if the Israelis know they're sitting on a demographic time bomb. In 50 years, there will be more Palestinians than Israelis, and then the so-called "democracy" sham will be exposed.
timthepatriot replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I feel bad having to say this to you because I assume that you are an adult and should have already received the memo... but, the bible is an ancient work of fiction that has been retooled for centuries to favor whomever has the power to control the message.

All of our man-made religious institutions are bogus and what America SHOULD DO is step aside and watch the Middle East blow itself up within the next 15 to 20 years. This would serve as a lesson for generations to come (in the progressive nations) pertaining to the destructive nature of organized religion.

And "God's blessing" counts for zip these days, fyi. Plant a tree. Grow a garden. Mentor someone in need. Put your energy into something that exists.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stand_for_truth says:
Keep up the Excellent work, Sandy! If most American's knew first hand what is actually happening in the occupied territories they would not stand for the "special" relationship we have going with an outright apartheid state. I'd recommend Anna Baltzer's "Witness in Palestine" for those that want to know an American Jew's observation while she was there. If you support Israel's inhumane occupation after that, one can only wonder how much blind hatred you have in you of the people you really don't know.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PVperson2 says:
Nazi's, the Israeli's have become Nazi's.
reply
askagain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Think now. The NAZIS were agressive attacking country after country. On the other hand, Israel was attacked by the Arabs as soon as iy became a country and many times after that. Palestine lost its land to Israel. Palestine is not sincere about peace with Israel. Israel must do what is necessary to secure its borders. Your comparison of Israel yo Nazis is convoluted, irrational, and historically incorrect.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rgage12 says:
Israel has a right to defend herself. The land was Israel's long before the Palestinian went into it. Let us not forget, Israel had the land before being forced out of it long-ago...
reply
saucymugwump replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
By this reasoning, the USA should give the entire country back to Native Americans and Mexicans, as they were the original inhabitants.
See all 25 Comments