AP/ September 22, 2011, 8:08 AM

Young becoming "lost generation" amid recession

WASHINGTON - Call it the recession's lost generation.

In record-setting numbers, young adults struggling to find work are shunning long-distance moves to live with Mom and Dad, delaying marriage and buying fewer homes, often raising kids out of wedlock. They suffer from the highest unemployment since World War II and risk living in poverty more than others — nearly 1 in 5.

New 2010 census data released Thursday show the wrenching impact of a recession that officially ended in mid-2009. It highlights the missed opportunities and dim prospects for a generation of mostly 20-somethings and 30-somethings coming of age in a prolonged slump with high unemployment.

"We have a monster jobs problem, and young people are the biggest losers," said Andrew Sum, an economist and director of the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University. He noted that for recent college grads now getting by with waitressing, bartending and odd jobs, they will have to compete with new graduates for entry-level career positions when the job market eventually does improve.

"Their really high levels of underemployment and unemployment will haunt young people for at least another decade," Sum said.

Poverty continues to rise in U.S., now 15.1%
South, West lead U.S. in marriage and divorce
New data shows soaring wealth gap among races

Richard Freeman, an economist at Harvard University, added, "These people will be scarred, and they will be called the 'lost generation' — in that their careers would not be the same way if we had avoided this economic disaster."

Beyond the economy's impact, the new figures also show a rebound in the foreign-born population to 40 million, or 12.9 percent, the highest share since 1920. The 1.4 million increase from 2009 was the biggest since the mid-decade housing boom and could fuel debate in this election season about U.S. immigration strategy.

Most immigrants continue to be low-skilled workers from Latin America, with growing numbers from Asia also arriving on the bet that U.S. jobs await. An estimated 11.2 million immigrants are here illegally.

Seniors 65 and older tended to return to or stay put in their jobs, accounting for the few U.S. employment gains in recent months. About 1 in 6 older Americans is now in the labor force — the highest level since the 1960s, before more generous Social Security and Medicare benefits made it more attractive to retire.

Nationwide, employment among young adults 16-29 stood at 55.3 percent, down from 67.3 percent in 2000 and the lowest since the end of World War II. Young males who lacked a college degree — typically black and Hispanic — were most likely to lose jobs due to reduced demand for blue-collar jobs in construction, manufacturing and transportation during the downturn. Among teens, employment was less than 30 percent.

(Earlier this year, CBS' "60 Minutes" broadcast a report on the legal but controversial practice of employing children to work on America's fields.)

Farm labor: Children in the fields
Video: Watch the full segment
Video: Living in the migrant camp

In all, the employment-to-population ratio for all age groups from 2007-2010 dropped faster than for any similar period since the government began tracking the data in 1948. In the past year, 43 of the 50 largest U.S. metropolitan areas continued to post declines in employment, led by Charlotte, N.C., Jacksonville, Fla., Las Vegas, Phoenix, Los Angeles and Detroit, all cities experiencing a severe housing bust, budget deficits or meltdowns in industries such as banking or manufacturing.

Without work, young adults aren't starting careers and lives in new cities, instead hanging out with their parents.

Among adults 18-34, the share of long-distance moves across state lines fell last year to roughly 3.2 million people, or 4.4 percent, the lowest level since World War II. For college graduates, who historically are more likely to relocate out of state, long-distance moves dipped to 2.4 percent.

Opting to stay put, roughly 5.9 million Americans 25-34 last year lived with their parents, an increase of 25 percent from before the recession. Driven by a record 1 in 5 young men who doubled up in households, men are now nearly twice as likely as women to live with their parents.

Marriages fell to a record low last year of just 51.4 percent among adults 18 and over, compared with 57 percent in 2000. Among young adults 25-34, marriage was at 44.2 percent, also a new low.

Broken down by race and ethnicity, 31 percent of young black men lived in their parents' homes, compared with 21 percent of young Latino men and 15 percent of young white men. At the state level, New York had the highest share of young men living with their parents at 21 percent, followed by New Jersey and Hawaii, all states with higher costs of living. Most of the cities with low percentages of young adults living at home were in the Midwest.

Homeownership declined for a fourth consecutive year, to 65.4 percent, following a peak of 67.3 percent in 2006.

"Many young adults are essentially postponing adulthood and all of the family responsibilities and extra costs that go along with it," said Mark Mather, an associate vice president at the private Population Reference Bureau. He described a shift toward a new U.S. norm — commonly seen in Europe — in which more people wait until their 30s to leave the parental nest.

"Some of these changes started before the recession but now they are accelerating, with effects on families that could be long term," Mather said.

1/2

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
132 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nottellin1 says:
kangus8 hit on the real 'crux' of this issue yesterday, written as:

"Every job I have applied to ( and it is in the hundreds at this point) has replied (if they do reply) with we are going with someone else."

I am willing to bet that every one of the jobs applied to has been via the internet and I can assure you that unless they are also picking up the phone, calling the hiring manager and building a relationship, they will continue to be denied. It is a known fact that for every internet job posting, an employer receives 100's of electronic applications. Unless the applicant finds a way to distingish themselves, they are highly unlikely to be picked from the bunch.
reply
judderwocky replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WOW. No way? You mean everyone would just get hired if they called the place back?

OMG. The thought never occurred to me. I'm sure that someone who had sent out over 200 applications never even thought to do that!

Wow You should be president! Just think you could go on national television, and tell all the unemployed to call people back, and then they would be hired.

I'm sorry. Your comment was the dumbest thing I have ever read.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nottellin1 says:
by realtimecoffee September 22, 2011 11:49 AM EDT
Indeed, the crux of the biscuit and Frank Zappa used to say

Is the Apostrophy - Wow, thanks realtime, I know the verse by heart but never truly understood until yesterday.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Samlv says:
I think we live in a plutocracy where the rich get what they want at everyone else's expense. Call it class warfare if you like, but all evidence points to money as the driver behind our leaders, and that needs to stop. How? Create a Congressional Operations Office which tracks, weekly, who visits our leaders, why, every change to every bill everyone makes, who WROTE the bills they are changing, and every phone call. After all, it is OUR government, so we deserve to know what is going on.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YLTL says:
We are not a lost generation! If anything, the generation that led us into this mess and squandered the opportunities of the 90s is the lost generation! I discussed it further in my blog:

http://www.yourlifetheirlife.com/blog/retort-lost-generation-09232011
reply
Samlv replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Nice SPAM. A 'generation' does not run a country. Our system is coin-operated now, with money and those who have it getting whatever they want. As evidence, look at the banking scandal, and the repeal of banking regulations, along with the fracking used to get natural gas on public lands with zero restriction, or the fact that oil companies get tax credits. Couple that with a flawed notion that free trade with China and India is fair trade, and there you have the major issues.
judderwocky replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@Samiv

An excellent point Samiv. For instance, you can see clearly the number of people in their 20's that hold political office. Clearly they are the ones running things.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
askagain says:
This article could actually describe the year I graduated college, 1971. That year, there were three college graduates for each job available. Kids were living at home and taking jobs as waiters and waitresses. The smart ones postphoned working and went to graduate school to become doctors, lawyers, scientists, and engineers. They did very well. Eventually the economy improved and jobs opened up for the next thirty-five or so years. My biggest concern is with young people having children out of wedlock and has nothing to do with morality. It is difficult enough raising children with two parents who are settled with jobs. When a young person has children on a very limited income, it becomes even more difficult to provide for children.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nohaj says:
To all the boomers here:

Making vicious comments about struggling young people on the internet does not make you more mature. It is pathetic.
reply
judderwocky replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LOL. Most of these people had children for the express purpose of being able to blame all their problems on them later in life.

They are getting their money's worth.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nohaj says:
To all the boomers here:

Making vicious comments about struggling young people on the internet does not make you more mature. It is pathetic.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileyccc says:
Technology cause this generation that has it's head in a computer to either work with a computer or not work at all.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kaylag04 says:
Cool! We're almost Europe!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oldman67 says:
Obama recieved 68% of the young voters vote. I hope they don't make that mistake again.
reply
baileyccc replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As long as they don't vote for the failed gop party that is wrecking the nation.
hairynews replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bush did not even get 49% of the vote and he was elected by the supreme court. Please do some research!
See all 132 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right