AP/ September 20, 2011, 9:20 AM

As DADT ends, gay officer sheds his alias

U.S. Air Force 1st Lt. Josh Seefried poses for a photo in Philadelphia, Sept. 17, 2011. For several years, he operated under an alias J.D. Smith while organizing an underground network for gay military personnel, pushing the Pentagon to communicate with gay service members about the law that prevented them from serving openly. With "don't ask, don't tell" about to end, the pseudonym J.D. Smith will no longer exist.

U.S. Air Force 1st Lt. Josh Seefried poses for a photo in Philadelphia, Sept. 17, 2011. For several years, he operated under an alias J.D. Smith while organizing an underground network for gay military personnel, pushing the Pentagon to communicate with gay service members about the law that prevented them from serving openly. With "don't ask, don't tell" about to end, the pseudonym J.D. Smith will no longer exist. / AP Photo/Alex Brandon

SAN FRANCISCO — J.D. Smith was invented when a gay student group in upstate New York needed a speaker to talk about the U.S. military's ban on openly gay troops. In the 16 months since then, he advised the Pentagon on the policy, became an oft-quoted media commentator on the topic, and was a White House guest when President Barack Obama signed the bill paving the way for the ban's appeal.

On Tuesday, as the 18-year-old "don't ask, don't tell" policy goes away, so does J.D. Smith, the name a 25-year-old Air Force officer assumed to shield his identity as he engaged in high-wire activism that could have crashed down on his career. Even if no one asks, Air Force First Lt. Joshua David Seefried is telling.

"It's all about leading now," Seefried told The Associated Press as he prepared to come out to his superiors, put a picture of his Air Force pilot boyfriend on his office desk and update his personal Facebook profile to reflect his sexual orientation. "Those are things I feel like I should do because I guess that is what a leader would do. If we all stay in the closet and don't act brave, then the next generation won't have any progress."

"Don't ask, don't tell" consigned to history
Navy officer weds partner as gay ban ends
Military, gay rights groups prepare for the end of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

At Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey, Seefried works in finance, oversees a staff of 20 and is attached to the 87th Air Base Wing. Twice this year, he was set to deploy to the Middle East, and felt conflicted when his orders were canceled only because going overseas would have put J.D. Smith out of commission. A handful of friends at work know he is gay. Only one knows about OutServe, the underground network for gay military personnel he co-founded last year.

Although he expects only a fraction of the 65,000 gay men and lesbians estimated to be serving in the armed forces to reveal themselves at first, Seefried will not be alone. On Tuesday, his organization's magazine will publish an issue featuring photographs and biographies of him and 100 other gay service members. It will be available online and at Army and Air Force commissaries.

OutServe, which has grown to 4,300 members in more than 40 chapters from Alaska to Iraq, has had an exceptionally aggressive rise since its February 2010 launch. From the start, Seefried and a tech-savvy civilian friend, Ty Walrod, saw its mission as two-fold: to ease the isolation of gay service members and to educate the public about the price of requiring them to serve in silence.

They set up a private Facebook group for gay personnel, starting with a handful of Seefried's friends. Each new recruit was allowed to nominate others for membership — and the group grew.

The organization also seized the chance to exercise a unique niche as the voice of gays in the military after Defense Secretary Robert Gates appointed a working group to study the ramifications of a potential repeal.

OutServe released an open letter to Gates stating that the working group's research would be flawed as long as it lacked a conduit to gays with boots on the ground. While the ban on openly gay service remained in effect, the Pentagon acknowledged, active duty gay and lesbian troops could not be part of the conversations.

"Many of us have served, and will continue to serve, openly in our units across all branches of the military," the letter said. "These are the very units that should be studied the most, for they most clearly demonstrate the capacity for soldiers to serve with each other, regardless of sexual orientation."

Eventually channels to the Pentagon were opened. The working group's report in November specifically acknowledged the gay network for supplying information that only its members could provide.

While the policy remained in effect, though, Seefried lived a strange double-life. At first, only Walrod, and later, Jonathan Hopkins, an Army captain who was discharged under the policy last year, participated in talks and meetings with military officials at the Pentagon. As J.D. Smith, Seefried exchanged emails with civilians involved in the working group study.

His two lives converged unexpectedly on the day President Obama signed the repeal bill. To get into the ceremony, he underwent security clearance as Josh Seefried, "but they knew I was J.D. Smith."

Walrod said Seefried has always been respectful of the chain of command. "He has been mindful of his position as someone who is leading this organization, but also trying to follow the law of the land as it still governs him."

The alias J.D. Smith was an amalgam of Seefried's real initials and his mother's maiden name that he hastily created when a gay student group at State University New York at Oswego invited him to speak about "don't ask, don't tell" in advance of Army Secretary John McHugh's scheduled commencement speech.

Thanks in part to OutServe's expanding membership, J.D. Smith quickly found himself in demand. Each interview provided an opportunity and risk. He declined the use of voice alteration equipment, but made TV appearances in shadow.

"I always had the policy of not changing my voice. It would add too much creepiness to it," he said. "I got extremely lucky last year that no one ever found out in my office. If my commander had found out and approached me about it, I don't know what would have happened."

For more info:

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
40 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lubricano says:
JD would rather hear a fat soldier fart than a pretty girl sing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lubricano says:
JD would rather hear a fat soldier fart than a pretty girl sing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NoodleLike says:
...and after having nothing else to do, I'm certain they'll once again ramp up the witch hunt on cigarette smokers and coffee drinkers.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Larkztongue says:
Why does anyone want to join this murderous cartel called the US Military?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
believer8661 says:
Will someone please explain to me what's the big deal. If you think they will go to hell for being gay ok; you have the right as an American citizen to believe that. But regardless of if they can tell someone are not does not change who they are or what they do.

Besides, I have a brother in the Navy and my mother and husband served in the Armed Forces; they say that it doesn't matter if they can officially admit it or not for the most part you know who is gay and who isn't.

Get over yourselves people regardless of if these people are gay or not it doesn't affect you one way or another. You will not go to hell for there "transgressions", and just like straight people gays do not want everyone they see.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mottasa-2009 says:
The Pedophiles will be next....
reply
Cru09 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No.. They won't.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GenuineAmerican says:
Regardless that the DADT policy has been abolished, should anyone engage in any actions that violate the UCMJ... "All disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces"...should be court-martialed.

The abolishing of the DADT does not mean it's now grab-ass time and that all other disciplines and military laws have been relaxed.

Considering the bizarre actions, manner of dress, and displayed over-the-top sexual-type acts that always occur, marching in the "Gay Pride" parade and being identifiable as a member of any branch of service could be construed to bring discredit upon the armed forces and a particular branch of military.

I do hope the military members are closely watched and military discipline enforced.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DenverBroncofan says:
All you babble thunpers are complete joke.
reply
agnesdeo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DenverBroncofan You can't understand God's Moral Law, we can't expect you to understand. But we still should offer you compassion, respect, and show you integrity as a fellow-human being.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Torquemada_ says:
Well, I'm up now. And I could care less about "JD Smith" or any other gay serving in the military. They are just soldiers to me. Still, as long as you brought it up, isn't his job to serve and are we not currently engaged in two wars (three if you count Libya)? Or is the mission now to fight the pentagon on behalf of gays? Did the time he spent as "JD Smith" distract him from his duties at McGuire? Was he able to give his country and the people under him the 100 percent they deserve, or was he preoccupied with this other, unauthorized mission?

Only Lt. Seefried knows that and I'm not going to presume to critique his service. I'm sure he is a fine officer. Still these are valid questions.

The other question I have is will the media cover the whole war again, like they did under President Bush or just homosexual activism in the military. I'd really like to know about the progress on the ground in Afghanistan and I don't see it being reported very often.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unbeliveable2 says:
To all who believe that history repeats itself. This is the first day. Let sometime pass and soon a disgruntled recruit will be upset because he was not allowed to give his significant other that kiss on the cheek or pat on the butt without feeling persecuted. Its the homosexual way. Others react the same way when they want or need change. Its just this is change for the worst. I know many do not want to hear this but it is change for the worst. Being in the fox hole in a fire fight lends me to the illusion that no one is thinking about who or who is not gay but getting the people in the fox hole who can do the job is. Anyone who thinks this is not a problem must realize this is just the first day.
reply
Cru09 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You're implying that homosexuals can't be the ones in the foxhole.
See all 40 Comments