CBS/AP/ September 12, 2011, 7:52 AM

"SpongeBob" hinders kids' minds, quickly: study

CHICAGO -- The cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants is in hot water from a study suggesting that watching just nine minutes of that program can cause short-term attention and learning problems in 4-year-olds.

The problems were seen in a study of 60 children randomly assigned to either watch "SpongeBob," or the slower-paced PBS cartoon "Caillou," or assigned to draw pictures. Immediately after these nine-minute assignments, the kids took mental function tests; those who had watched "SpongeBob" did measurably worse than the others.

Previous research has linked TV-watching with long-term attention problems in children, but the new study suggests more immediate problems can occur after very little exposure — results that parents of young kids should be alert to, the study authors said.

Kids' cartoon shows typically feature about 22 minutes of action, so watching a full program "could be more detrimental," the researchers speculated. But they said more evidence is needed to confirm that.

The results should be interpreted cautiously because of the study's small size, but the data seem robust and bolster the idea that media exposure is a public health issue, said Dr. Dimitri Christakis. He is a child development specialist at Seattle Children's Hospital who wrote an editorial accompanying the study published online Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

Christakis said parents need to realize that fast-paced programming may not be appropriate for very young children. "What kids watch matters, it's not just how much they watch," he said.

University of Virginia psychology professor Angeline Lillard, the lead author, said Nickelodeon's "SpongeBob" shouldn't be singled out. She found similar problems in kids who watched other fast-paced cartoon programming.

She said parents should realize that young children are compromised in their ability to learn and use self-control immediately after watching such shows. "I wouldn't advise watching such shows on the way to school or any time they're expected to pay attention and learn," she said.

Nickelodeon spokesman David Bittler disputed the findings and said "SpongeBob SquarePants" is aimed at kids aged 6-11, not 4-year-olds.

"Having 60 non-diverse kids, who are not part of the show's targeted (audience), watch nine minutes of programming is questionable methodology and could not possibly provide the basis for any valid findings that parents could trust," he said.

Asked aboput the Nickelodeon statement, Dr. Alanna Levine, a pediatrician and spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told ""Early Show" co-anchor Jeff Glor that, "From my point of view, the idea of the study is to look at specific effects of media on children. It doesn't matter specifically which television show it is. It's the qualities the television show has and what that does to children. So, I think there's a broader perspective here, and there actually is something we can learn from it."

But, she said, "We really need more studies to look at precisely what effect it is that these cartoons are having."

"The recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics," Levine noted, "is that children under two watch no television at all, and for children older than two, you want to limit their combined media use, which includes computers and video games, to two hours a day. And we also want to be careful about the type of programming our children are watching. It's not just the quantity, but the type, too."

Lillard said 4-year-olds were chosen because that age "is the heart of the period during which you see the most development" in certain self-control abilities. Whether children of other ages would be similarly affected can't be determined from this study.

Most kids were white and from middle-class or wealthy families. They were given common mental function tests after watching cartoons or drawing. The SpongeBob kids scored on average 12 points lower than the other two groups, whose scores were nearly identical.

In another test, measuring self-control and impulsiveness, kids were rated on how long they could wait before eating snacks presented when the researcher left the room. "SpongeBob" kids waited about 2 1/2 minutes on average, versus at least four minutes for the other two groups.

The study has several limitations. For one thing, the kids weren't tested before they watched TV. But Lillard said none of the children had diagnosed attention problems and all got similar scores on parent evaluations of their behavior.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
31 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
TV and video games are the reason that kids get bored and act up if they are not entertained every 3 seconds.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sherry1029 says:
You can not say how a child will turn out by what cartoon they watched when they were young!!!! That is crazy!!!!! Last I knew we live in free world but lately it seems like everyone wants to change that by telling us what to eat, and what to watch, Crazy!!! Find something that really needs to be fixed, like our Economy and quit picking on Sponge Bob!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Fatesrider says:
Here's the problem: Create a scientific "study", then release the results to writers who blow it all out of proportion. The writers scream to the world "SPONGE BOB IS BAD FOR YOUR KIDS!!!!" in the headline and every nut-job with a preconception reads just the headline, then posts some idiotic remark about how they always knew that.

Well guess what? You didn't.

"University of Virginia psychology professor Angeline Lillard, the lead author, said Nickelodeon's "SpongeBob" shouldn't be singled out. She found similar problems in kids who watched other fast-paced cartoon programming."

So, fast-paced cartoons are bad for kids. Duh. Not just SpongeBob, folks. Did you know THAT? Hardly...

People are SO ready to say "YES! I KNEW THAT!" to any drivel about which they have already formed an opinion. WAY too few people ever bother to look at the study - the parameters, the raw data, the actual purpose, who funds it, who benefits from it and the procedures they used to carry it out - with a jaundiced eye and discern for themselves if it's even remotely valid.

In this case, it isn't what the headline says. There are intriguing trends, and the article said there are no conclusions. But no, people jump on SpongeBob. The headline should have said, "Fast-Paced Cartoons Hinders Kids' Minds, Quickly: Study"

It should have added: Effect Temporary.

So the next time you turn off SpongeBob and turn on something else, you might want to make sure it's not fast-paced, too. That way little Johnny or Janie doesn't go off on an ADD-inspired rant deserving of a spanking, but probably ending up with a much less effective "time out".
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pr_boxer says:
Bull $hit! One hour of church makes them blithering idiots!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Skruffy1 says:
I guess that's not so bad. Some religious whackos not long ago wanted us to believe that Sponge Bob was gay and that watching it would turn our kids gay. And I fully agree with other commenters who commented that watching just about ANY mass media, especially that made for kids (with some exceptions) will dull kids' minds.
reply
rsmik replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Patrick is gay, not SpongeBob.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UForgotPoland says:
The show is complete mindlessness and meant for younger marijuana users.
reply
rsmik replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And children of all ages!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A_smart_guy says:
Let your kids watch Sponge Bob and in 20 years when they are calling my kid "boss" don't be surprised.
Ok so I do admit some kids are probably smart enough to overcome the "enormous disadvantage" of being exposed to Sponge Bob (and other garbage TV programing). For those commenting in support of Sponge Bob why don't you just call it like it is... you are a busy parent that has so much going on in your life that you have to "pick your battles". Be honest... you are too busy and tired to micro manage every single aspect of your child's life so that every stimuli that your child is exposed to is to EDIFY them (look that up you Sponge Bobers). Stop justifying your lack of doing the right thing as a parent by shooting holes in the study, leave that to the foolish looking Nickelodeon executives.
reply
rsmik replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I believe the term should be SpongeBobbers, not Sponge Bobers. But maybe your kid will grow up to be smarter than you.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
onechimpanzee says:
BFD. Let the kids watch "Family Guy"~ it's more Real World, dispite the usual cartoonish distortions.
"SpongeBob" prolly appeals to the same IQ demographic as "Gilligan's Island" did back in the day.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bikerb54 says:
I just want to know why a child has to be "learning" 24-7? What ever happened to good, old fashioned entertainment. My son grew up watching Bugs Bunny with me on his "down time" and still managed to read and learn at a much higher level than his age. Children need down time, time to use their imagination and just to "veg out". That's the problem with our youth today, no time for themselves. Parents fill all the kids' free time with more activities to "keep them busy"! Let them be kids, let them enjoy their childhood and quit trying to make them super geniuses. Our children today have no idea what it's like to just be a kid and enjoy the simple pleasures of being a kid.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
squarebird says:
So - give the kids the same tests IMMEDIATELY following a birthday party .. or after getting off a ride at Disney World. Nothing to see here, move along.
reply
See all 31 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right