Dozens more arrested in oil pipeline protest

A U.S. Park Police officer handcuffs and arrests a protester over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. / AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta
WASHINGTON - Arrests are beginning anew outside the White House as police remove dozens of protesters who are hoping to convince President Barack Obama to block TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline.
Fifty protesters remain in jail after being arrested outside the White House on Saturday, the opening day of a two-week civil disobedience campaign.
They're expected to be released Monday night.
By noon today, police began arresting more demonstrators, including 68-year-old Patricia Warwick of Toronto.
A 65-year-old woman from Massachusetts who's celebrating her birthday was also arrested.
Protest organizers say a total of 46 will be arrested and will join their colleagues in jail by day's end.
Background on proposed Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline
Dozens were arrested outside the White House on Saturday after staging a sit-in to protest the proposed $7 billion pipeline that would boost U.S. dependence on Canadian oil sands.
Thousands of opponents of the pipeline plan to get arrested, in protests over the next two weeks that they hope will help persuade the Obama administration to kill the project.
The State Department is set to issue a final environmental impact report this month on the Keystone XL pipeline project that would bring oil sands petroleum from Alberta to Texas refineries. The department hopes to make a final decision on the TransCanada Corp line by the end of the year.
The pipeline would provide thousands of construction jobs, which could make it hard for the Obama administration to kill the project.
Opponents want the administration to stop the pipeline, which would deliver up to 700,000 barrels per day of oil to Gulf Coast refineries, because it would cross water sources that could be vulnerable to spills. Also, oil sands petroleum emits more carbon dioxide than average crude oils.
If President Obama approves the pipeline, environmentally minded voters who cast their ballots for him in 2008 may not be as inclined to back him next year, especially after the failure of a climate change bill, and after the administration opened up a large section of Wyoming for mining coal in May.
Holding a sign that read "Obama, will you stand up to big oil?", protesters lingered outside the White House even after police announced they would be arrested if they did not move.
One by one, police called protesters out of the crowd, placed them under arrest and led them into a police vehicle.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Young victims of deadly Okla. tornado 8 Photos
- Tsarnaev friend implicates dead brother, self in murders 163 Comments
- Clean-up efforts underway in Okla. 29 Photos
- Boy Scouts to vote on allowing openly gay members 71 Comments
- Hard recovery in store after Okla. tornado's devastation
- Minn. park landslide leaves 1 child dead, 1 missing
- Body of child recovered from deadly Minn. landslide
- Up-close video of Moore, Okla., tornado Play Video














I believe independent citizen oversight is needed to ensure that oil stays IN THE PIPE and is safely transport. If you agree, please consider signing the petition to Congress asking for the creation of a regional citizen advisory council for the Alaska Pipeline: http://www.change.org/petitions/dont-let-an-oil-spill-ruin-the-copper-river-salmon-run
By the way, calling a black man "boy" hasn't been acceptable for decades. It's called "racism".
Right now, we have to sacrifice to stop climate change. The increased storms, heat waves, and droughts are bad enough already. We are headed for mass extinctions, famine, and floods. We need to cut carbon emissions before it gets worse, because it will take a long time to turn the climate around.
Here's a fact for you:
Total Cdn. Oilsands CO2 emissions = 0.1% of global CO2 emissions = the largest coal fired power plant in China. Now do a little thinking and figure out where it might be best to concentrate efforts to reduce CO2 emissions (if that is your goal). Coal fired power plants???? There was a large # of forest fires in Alberta this summer - burned more of the Boreal forest (2.3 MM acres) than you can ever dream of being disturbed by oilsands operations.... - probably released a lot of CO2 too....