CBS/AP/ August 17, 2011, 5:58 AM

Brits get 4 years prison for Facebook riot posts

Jordan Blackshaw (at left) and Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, both sentenced to four years in prison for inciting disorder on Facebook.

Jordan Blackshaw (at left) and Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, both sentenced to four years in prison for inciting disorder on Facebook. / Chesire Police

LONDON - About 1,400 people have already been charged with riot-related offenses after the chaos which gripped Britain last week.

More than 1,200 have appeared in court — often in chaotic, round-the clock-sessions dispensing justice that is swifter, and harsher, than usual.

Although public opinion currently favors stern punishment for anyone involved in the riots and looting, a few cases have made headlines and sparked debate.

Late Tuesday, two men in northwestern England were handed stiff jail terms for inciting disorder through social networking sites. Cheshire Police said Jordan Blackshaw, 20, and Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, 22, both received 4-year sentences for using Facebook to "organize and orchestrate" disorder.

Social media to blame for London riots?
Photos: Riots in the U.K.
Is social media turning socially dangerous?

Blackshaw used the social networking site to create an event — with a date, time and location — for "massive Northwich lootin."'

Sutcliffe created a page on Facebook called "Warrington Riots" which listed a time and date for anyone who wished to be involved in a riot.

Prison sentences as long as four years have typically been handed down in Britain for serious crimes such as grievous bodily harm, sexual assault and other forms of assault or attempted assault.

Most of the convicted suspects have been sent for sentencing to higher courts which have the power to impose longer terms of imprisonment. Two-thirds of the accused have not been granted bail.

Some of the harsher sentences are expected to be appealed, and legal and human rights activists in Britain have expressed concern that the punishments may be reactionary and serve only to clog up the court system with appeals for years to come.

"The public disturbances are seen as an aggravating factor and that is fair enough," Andrew Neilson from the Howard League for Penal Reform told CBS News partner network Sky News. "But there seems to be a complete lack of proportionality to some of the sentences...These make a mockery of proportionality, which is a key principle of the justice system."

The maximum sentence for a conviction of inciting disorder in the U.K. is 10 years, however, and a representative of Britain's Crown Prosecution Service said the two young mens' Facebook posts, "caused significant panic and revulsion in local communities as rumors of anticipated violence spread."

That backing for tough sentences was echoed by a senior police officer from one of the hard-hit areas in England.

"The sentences passed down recognize how technology can be abused to incite criminal activity and sends a strong message to potential troublemakers," Assistant Chief Constable of Cheshire Police, Phil Thompson, told Sky.

Although Prime Minister David Cameron said last week that those who participated in the riots should go to prison, the government denied trying to influence the judiciary.

The courts service said "sentencing is a matter for the independent judiciary," though it acknowledged that magistrates in London were being told by their legal advisers "to consider whether their powers of punishment are sufficient in dealing with some cases arising from the recent disorder."

May, the home secretary, said she had pressed prosecutors to lift anonymity from underage defendants convicted of riot-related offenses. Defendants under 18 are customarily offered anonymity by law, even if they are convicted.

Other examples of contentious sentences in the wake of the riots include a London man who received six months in jail for stealing a case of water worth about $5 from a looted supermarket. A Manchester mother of two who did not take part in the riots was sentenced to five months for wearing a pair of looted shorts her roommate had brought home.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
28 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dr_taam says:
oh my. really? 4 years for typing?
okay, listen up people: please murder someone.
er, did I just cause a murder? did someone watch a television show that incited murder? did playing a video game really incite a murder? did listening to ozzy osborne make you kill yourself?
aren't we past that yet? aren't we growing up yet as a species?
this is shameful beyond all. locking people up for typing. really? wow. I am just stunned.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Law_Report says:
It doesn't surprise me that every one has lost site of what caused all this in the first place: the murder of an unarmed citizen by the police. Instead of arresting one police officer who gunned down an unarmed man they instead chose to arrest hundreds of citizens who were angered by the oppression of the police. Don't be foolish enough to think this is over. The issue of police oppression is still there and it exists all over the world. Go to www.LawReport.org
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AnnieDanny says:
Why are they trying to downplay what these two guys did? What happened in Great Britain was horrible and these two apparently tried to stir it up even more. The flash mob crime that's been going on is the stuff of horrors, it's called ANARCHY which is the worst thing that can happen: it's a sign of the complete breakdown of society.

Throw the book at 'em, it's the only possible solution. They could have gotten 10 years, they only got 4 so they got off easy. Freedom of speech is one thing, but looting, rioting, destroying, stealing and even some killing that went on in the UK for nearly a week: that has nothing to do with freedom of speech. It's all too easy to pull that out of the bag but it's ridiculous to compare basic freedoms with the violent mobs that overwhelmed the UK.

Is this article deliberately trying to make people angry? The flash mob phenomena are being organized via social media, that's what I've read. If it's true then such posts as these young men made need to be taken seriously. And to incite mayhem via Facebook is nothing less than Domestic Terrorism, IMO.
reply
wardove replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
what ever happened happened because ppl. did what they did .Where these ppl. forced to riot no they wanted too.So now everyone you better keep your opinion to your selves , freedom is a illusion now days.shhhh they might hear you and blame you for the next riot, how lame
linkicon reporticon emailicon
voshnarenek says:
Shshshhs. They can hear you.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ibsteve2u says:
There are stunning parallels between the decay and fall of the British empire, its current final dissolution, and the path the United States is on. We, of course, insist on doing everything faster...but the American right - their base, rather - should pay close attention to Britain...particularly to the speed with which the apparatus of a police state unfolds.

The right's base has always laughed in derision when I tell them that it will be the American right that takes away America's guns...that is the way it always works: Those who have taken the economic mobility and future away from a nation ALWAYS eventually move to ensure that the people will not be able to gain redress the old-fashioned way. I.e., those who have it all will work to keep it all. And as our inequality curve points out, it is our right who is taking it all.

loll...but they'll still be able to get mileage out of manipulating their base with the NRA for a half-dozen years to a decade or so.
reply
onebrickshy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I believe in freedom of speech but use common sense, using the internet to start a riot by thugs to steal while under the guise of rioting because the police killed a thug friend is pushing the limits. I know by your broad general use of term Freedom of speech you think its ok to email a group of friends and run down and flash rob a 7/11. Darn I forgot again liberals have their common sense removed at birth.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HiTor15 says:
Freedom of speech means just that. I would urge that the people being persecuted here, organize again, and give the brits more problems, till they learn. Those that vandalized and perhaps hurt people are different. If you robbed someone, or hurt someone or vandalized someone's property then frankly you are a criminal but if all you did was to post and carried out no illegal actions the idea of your being jailed is absurd and should be met with vehement protest again. These riots were caused by the stupidity of the governments handling of the economy. A stupidity that is on going and will cause yet more pain to many more people for many year. Today the jobless rate in Britain went up. How long do you think the British people are going to tolerate this incompetence? Why should they? Scapegoating two people on the net is asking for worse problems and worse reactions! If Cameron's gov wants to stop the riots, he should do something to be fairer to the ordinary people of that nation! Prime minister Brown before him gave away the house, and now this guy, from what I have heard wants to make the poor pay for it all being that he is representing the wealthy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
amyecurtis says:
I most definitely agree with this sentence, but with more years added, especially since their actions caused others harm and even death because of the rioting. I think punishment should be given for such crimes, but for those with minor involvement...all those thugs should be put on years of probation, have to do community service work, and pay for the damages by docking their pay; If they're on welfare, it should be taken from that. Thousands have lost their homes and businesses and have been seriously injured or killed because of social terrorist like this...all those involved with these hate crimes should be held accountable!
reply
antoniof123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Did you read this or are you a moron they actions didn't cause any harm there was never a riot.

That is the problem with right wing nut facists they don't read they don't have a clue.

Go back to idiot school.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WeHappyFew says:
No, helloall34,

How exactly does one use facebook as a tool without posting?

Oh yes, organizing looting went on on Facebook but predominantly BBM. But not in this case. No looting in Northwich, no rioting, no massive social network activity to suggest there was any appetite for mass civil unrest in this town. Meanwhile London, Birmingham, Bristol, Salford, Manchester all looking like the the battle of Stalingrad.No convictions there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2 says:
Four years is too light of a sentence. These punks, thugs and mental defectives caused violence, destruction, looting, etc. Civilized society is better off with these types doing hard time.
reply
wardove replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2- 4 years for posting hmm what a crazy world we live in.Peace to the world , i will pray for this.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dantom39 says:
I am very happy for them good vacation.
reply
See all 28 Comments