Dow plunges 512 points; Worst fall since 2008
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Aug. 4, 2011, in New York. / AP Photo
Updated 6:53 p.m. ET
NEW YORK - Fears about the global economy led to the biggest panic in financial markets since the 2008 financial crisis.
The Dow plunged nearly 513 points Thursday, its biggest point decline since falling 677 on Dec. 1, 2008 in the midst of the financial crisis. The last time the market recorded a larger percentage drop was in early 2009.
Only three of the 500 stocks in the Standard & Poor's 500 index had gains. Oil fell by 6 percent. The yield on the two-year Treasury note hit a record low as investors sought out relatively stable investments.
All three major stock indexes are down 10 percent or more from their previous highs, a drop-off that is considered to be a market correction. A drop of 20 percent or more signifies the start of a bear market, an extended period of stock declines.
The Dow Jones industrial average was down 512.76 points, or 4.3 percent, to 11,383.68. Thursday's losses turned the blue-chip stock index negative for the year.
The S&P 500 — the benchmark for most mutual funds — lost 60.20, or 4.8 percent, to 1,200.14. It is now down 12 percent from its recent high of 1,363 reached on April 29. The Nasdaq composite shed 136.68, or 5.1 percent, to 2,556.39.
Investors are increasingly concerned about the possibility of another recession in the U.S. and a debt crisis in Europe.
"We are continuing to be bombarded by worries about the global economy," said Bill Stone, chief investment strategist at PNC Financial.
The Vix, a measure of investor fear, shot up 36 percent. It is up 92.6 percent for the quarter, which began July 1.
Oil dipped to $87 a barrel on worries demand will fall because of the slowing economy. It had traded over $100 as recently as June 9.
Nearly 20 stocks fell for every one that rose on the New York Stock Exchange.
European stocks also fell broadly because of concerns that Italy or Spain may need help from the European Union. The benchmark stock indexes in Italy, Germany and England each fell 3 percent.
Stock trading has been volatile this week because of concerns that the U.S. economy is weakening. Manufacturing, consumer spending and hiring by private companies are below levels that are consistent with a healthy economy. Those reports have called into question estimates from economists, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, that the economy will grow more quickly in the second half of the year.
Money poured into investments that are seen as relatively safe when markets are turbulent. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell to 2.42 percent, its lowest level of the year. The yield on the 2-year Treasury note hit a record low of 0.26 percent. Bond yields fall when demand for them increases.
Mark Luschini, chief investment strategist for Janney Montgomery Scott, an investment firm in Philadelphia, said some clients are moving to cash "as a parking lot to sort things out."
"With the scars of 2008 still fresh, some clients don't want to miss the chance to pre-empt further damage should it come," Luschini said.
Large investors have moved so much money into cash accounts at Bank of New York that on Thursday the bank said it would begin charging some clients a 0.13 percent fee to hold their cash.
"In the past month, we have seen a growing level of deposits on our balance sheet from clients seeking a safe-haven in light of the global interest rate and credit environment," the bank said in a statement to The Associated Press. Bank of New York clients include pension funds and large investment houses.
"Investors are deciding that now is the time to take risk off the table," said Brian Gendreau, market strategist for Cetera Financial Group. Gendreau said that some investors are now wondering whether stocks will have a prolonged slump similar to the aftermath of the Great Depression.
Technical trading, a term used to signify buying or selling based on the S&P 500's prior highs and lows, also helped push stocks downward. The S&P 500 fell below 1,222, a so-called support level, early in the day. That signified to some traders that the stock market would continue to slide.
"Traders are respecting the technical levels even if they're not technicians," said Quincy Krosby, market strategist at Prudential Financial. "Even if you're what we call a conviction buyer, you have to respect those levels."
Companies that outperform when the global economy expands fell the most. Alcoa fell the most, with a 9 percent drop. Bank of America and Caterpillar were down 7 percent. Boeing ended down 6 percent.
Some traders are selling ahead of Friday's employment report, which is expected to show that unemployment remained at 9.2 percent last month. A rise in the unemployment number would likely push stocks lower again.
The U.S. government said before the market opened that the number of people who applied for unemployment benefits for the first time was only slightly lower last week to 400,000. That's still above the 375,000 level that economist say indicates a healthy job market. It was the latest indication of weakness in the U.S. economy.
All 10 industry groups in the S&P index fell. Energy, materials and industrial companies each lost 5 percent or more.
The sell-off comes at a time when corporate profits are growing. The forward price to earnings ratio of the S&P 500 has fallen to about 12, well below its long-term average of 16. That means that investors who buy now are paying less for each dollar in profits.
Based on what an investor now pays for corporate profits, stocks are now trading at their lowest levels in 20 years, said Tim Courtney, chief investment officer of Burns Advisory Group in Oklahoma City.
Few companies were spared in the sell-off. Just 3 of the 500 stocks in the S&P 500 moved higher. General Motors Co. fell 4 percent despite beating analyst's earnings estimates.
The stock market as a whole had its biggest fall since the start of the current bull market in March 2009. The drop in the S&P was the largest since a 45-point decline on January 20, 2009. The Dow is down 1.7 percent for the year. The S&P 500 is down 4.6 percent. And the Nasdaq is down 3.6 percent. The Russell 2000, an index made up of small companies, has fared the worst. It was down 5.6 percent Thursday and is down 7.3 percent for the year.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Chrysler expected to make Jeep recall refusal official
- Chrysler agrees to recall of Jeeps at risk of fire
- Why geniuses don't have jobs
- 6 ways to pay off your student loans
- Chrysler continues its refusal to issue a Jeep recall
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- The Internship: 6 real-life lessons from the movie
No one is dealing with the world wide paucity of leadership to get the world economy out of this
China's call for a new reserve currency is throwing their toys out of the pram but India's weighing now. I will say Those who imagined Reagan WON the cold war must be feeling pretty foolish right about now.
S&P haven't a great record for foresight or insight but splitting hairs on the level of fallout over the next decade is beside the point.
Thanks to the swingeing cuts agreed in US debt ceiling settlement the European markets,heavily invested in the Eurozone bailout, are in tail spin given the likelihood of an American double dip recession. The Dow might be bloodied but the FTSE's in free fall.
Clueless idiots who presume that the Tea Party are doing anything other than wrecking a lot if things they have no understanding of, need to butt out.
Well, it's knocking on for quarter to two in the wee hours so I'm going to bed.
Damage was already done because of
a) the faff over the debt ceiling and
b) the market reckons with the attendant spending cuts and failure to revenue raise the US is destined to both go into recession and have no compensatory revenue raising exercise.
That is NOT nice.
The average American citizen have NOT deserved this.
First there is widespread job losses and the economy is going downwards, then YOU come and add insult to injury.
Not nice at all.
Shame on you !
This isn't Mayberry, after all.
Your own words, stating you only watch the lefwing news sites.....
It's pretty pathetic to lie to someone about what they said, while you're trying to interject YOUR WORDS, into the other person's mouth - like I'm going to forget what I SAID just 40 minutes ago.
I don't see in this statement, where I make the claim that I "only watch or read left wing news sources", do you?
by starving1968-3 August 5, 2011 3:48 PM EDT
I WILL NOT accept NRO, Weekly Standard, Fox News, etc as "sources".
Fox is as extremist as MSNBC, if not more. They sell fear, and the gullible are buying it by the barrel.
Starving I suppose you have an issue with receiving news from multiple view points and disseminating it all for a less BIASED better understanding, a better overall picture of the truth. Your own words, stating you only watch the lefwing news sites makes you a blindingly ignorant partisan, good luck with that strategy, it explains alot about your blather.
I don't watch "left wing news sites" exclusivley - that's YOUR lie, not MY statement.
I said that I readily disregard the EXTREME RIGHT WING points of view, because they have repeatedly proven to be untrustworthy, full of lies, and they regularly fabricate the "news" that their readers want to hear and see - which is rarely in conjunction with the truth.
starving1968-3, I find science and my religion are in perfect harmony.....thank you very much
You say "science can be proven" ?
are theories proven ? or are they educated guesses ?
Science and your religion are in perfect harmony?
Care to explain ANY scientific discovery that is also proven in your bible?
Try "where did all the water go after God flooded the world"?
Or maybe you can prove how the only four people on the planet where Adam, Eve, Seth, and Cain (after he killed Abel of course), Cain left and returned with a "bride". Where did she come from?
And the Democrats in the Senate could have said NO to any of that. If they thought the Republicans were about to ruin the country they were pretty gutless to have not stoped them. Why the cowardice?
how could the democrats have stopped the republicans, when the republicans had majorities in the senate, congress, and also held the White House?
That nonsense should be outlawed.
get it now ???? of course you don't...your dumb
-------------
ALWAYS funny watching someone screw up English when trying to call someone else dumb!
Classic!
--------
I was just pointing out that you could use some education in your native language.
Which way does CBS lean? LOL!
by EmpireGeorge-_ August 5, 2011 4:14 PM EDT
nottblu, lean ? they are fully horizontal, facing left.
So why post here then?
Sorry, but I'm almost resolved to the fact that this great nation is going the way of the Roman Empire. Once the politicians started spending all of their time trying to game the political system, the game was over. It's the same thing here - history is repeating itself.