The 10th anniversary of 9/11 is next month. And one big reason there hasn't been another major attack on the U.S. since then is a series of preventive measures taken by the FBI, according to New York Times best-selling author Ronald Kessler, who reveals some of them in his latest book, "The Secrets of the FBI."
Kessler spoke with FBI director Robert Mullen who, "Early Show" co-anchor Chris Wragge noted, doesn't give many interviews. He spoke with Kessler on the record.
On "The Early Show," Kessler said Mullen attributes the lack of any major attack since 9/11 to a major shift in direction at the bureau.
"(They've changed into a) prevention agency, rather than one that emphasizes prosecution and putting people in jail," Kessler said. "Of course, the CIA also has been very important. What he says, even though al Qaeda has been degraded, what keeps him up at night is still the possibility of a WMD (weapon of mass destruction) attack or attack on airplanes, because it really doesn't take a whole lot to pull off one of these attacks."
Kessler learned about a group known as Tactical Operations, or TacOps. Kessler explained the group is top-secret and staffed with seven teams comprised of 10 agents each.
"(They are), essentially, court-sanctioned burglars, as they describe themselves," Kessler said. "They break into homes, offices, even embassies, to plant bugging devices and snoop into computers. Could be terrorists, could be Mafia figures, and all secret, of course. They will check out the premises for weeks. They'll find out if there are any dogs. If there are, they'll have a veterinarian prescribe the right amount of tranquilizer based on a photograph; they'll shoot the dog with a dart gun with a tranquilizer and put him out. And then at the end, they'll wake him up. They will actually create false fronts to homes or offices, and then, behind those false fronts, in the middle of the night, they will pick the locks."
Wragge said, "That's how they were able to bring down John Gotti, too, using some of those false fronts, correct?"
Kessler said, "In that case, they installed electrical outlets that actually were bugging devices. The FBI actually showed me a real bug. It's the size of a postage stamp, and when this particular agent, who's executive assistant director of the FBI and used to be on TacOps ... was beginning to tell me some of these secrets, I actually thought to myself, 'Am I going to be arrested? Or is he going to be arrested?' Actually, the ... public affairs person sitting in, interjected and said, 'Is this something that we can be telling him?' So, really, unprecedented that these secrets would come out."
I feel less safe after reading the article than before I read it.
Perhaps these legalized housebreakers might remember that advanced electronics are available to anybody. The kind of people the agency is going after may be the type to bug and security cam their property to keep an eye on what happens when they're not around.
If there's an advantage in the FBI secretly searching and bugging a place then there's an advantage in secretly KNOWING the FBI secretly searched a bugged a place.
With the right kind of money or connections, I'm sure it's possible to get devices every bit as advanced as those the FBI uses or even the very instruments they use.
Come to that, no matter how good the equipment there is always another device which can detect it. So the whole thing could become a pjssing contest to see who has the best tech. :-)
...USING THIS AS A METHOD TO ENGAGE IN TRADITIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IS SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY!
Most organized crime investigations have nothing to do with terrorism and have been conducted via traditional law enforcement means for decades. It sounds like the FBI has taken advantage of the 9/11 tragedy to come up with a whole new scope of police powers to do as they please. Not all of these types of operations are undertaken with prior judicial approval.
So what other types of investigations\operations are conducted in this manner? What types of crimes are involved?
This is one of the things that civil libertarians were so concerned about...and they are right to be concerned. It has repeatedly been demonstrated that the FBI will be misused for political purposes in the past and there is no reason to trust the Government's bland assurances that this won't happen again in the future.