CBS/AP/ July 29, 2011, 11:04 AM

Mo. high school bans "Slaughterhouse-Five"

REPUBLIC, Mo. — Two books have been banned from the libraries and curriculum at Republic High School after a parent complained that their content taught principles contrary to the Bible.

The district's school board voted Monday to remove Kurt Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse-Five" and Sarah Ockler's "Twenty Boy Summer," but to allow Laurie Halse Anderson's "Speak" to be used in the district's high school, The Springfield News-Leader reported.

Superintendent Vern Minor said the board based its decision on whether the books were age-appropriate.

"We very clearly stayed out of discussion about moral issues," Minor said. "Our discussions from the get-go were age-appropriateness."

Wesley Scroggins of Republic, who had challenged the books and lesson plans last year, said he was mostly pleased with the decision.

"I congratulate them for doing what's right and removing the two books," said Scroggins. "It's unfortunate they chose to keep the other book."

It took a year to reach a decision because the complaint prompted the 4,500-student district to form a task force to develop book standards for all its schools, Minor said.

The panel considered existing policies and public rating systems that already exist for music, TV and video games before adopting new standards in April. Those standards were applied to the three books, Minor said.

Several people read the books and provided feedback.

"It was really good for us to have this discussion," Minor said. "Most schools stay away from this and they get on this rampage, the whole book-banning thing, and that's not the issue here. We're looking at it from a curriculum point of view."

Minor said most people supported keeping "Speak," which is taught in English I and II courses, because although it had one short description of a rape, it had a strong message at the end.

But he said those who read "Twenty Boy Summer," available in the library, thought it sensationalized sexual promiscuity and included questionable language, drunkenness, lying to parents and a lack of remorse. And he said "Slaughterhouse Five" contained crude language and adult themes that are more appropriate for college-age students.

Minor said students will be allowed to use those two books for extra class material if they have their parents' permission.

The Springfield News-Leader writes that Superintendent Minor will next propose a policy that blocks R-rated movies from being shown to high school students.

"That's on my list of other board policies," he told the school board earlier this week.

Minor's description of his proposal to the News-Leader - setting maximum MPAA rating levels for movies shown to elementary, middle and high school students - would prevent teachers from using such films as "Schindler's List," "Saving Private Ryan," "Glory" and Roman Polanski's "Macbeth" in their curriculum.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
88 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KCKenpo says:
Went to high school in Republic. Dropped out. Now you see why. The staffing at their schools is absurd and rife with self-importance. Also: Check the middle school link on the district's page; you'll see a girl reading "Breaking Dawn," which I guess is perfectly clean literature for middle school students.

PS: Republic kids smoke lots and lots of dope, and the girls are easy. Let them have the book.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
salrso says:
I went to school in Republic, and I have to agree that religion is a driving force within the community. I am not a religious person myself, I'm good with God, and I have no use for those who tell me that I'm not. However, religion aside, if there was no religious connection to this issue, would we still want our children accessing this book? I read this book in a high school, and I don't believe I was scarred by it, but looking back, I still ask this question; "Was it appropriate reading material?" By the way, the library also had a copy of Mein Kampf which I gave up on after a day...lol. In the end it's up to the parents, the kid's are going to be able to access this book whether in school, the public library, or in the local book store.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rmath12 says:
I just want everyone on this thread to know that the students and most of the citizens of Republic, Missouri think this is as stupid as all of you do. We had only 4 members of our school board vote on this issue, and only one of them had read the books. We aren't all as dumb as it sounds.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mjlewis6 says:
If we allow extremism to inhabit our public education system, we might as well bow to political interpretation of our personal rights, religious constriction of our public conduct and penal consequences for failure to adhere to the joint public servant/religious boards for hiding moral dissidents.

In short, we are subject to governmental/religous interpretation of our lives and subject to stoning for failure to conform. Thanks alot.

Think Republic can reconcile history of our country being about religious freedom and WHY so many colonists came to "America" to escape English persecution of their faith?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DRMidnite11 says:
Next...they'll be burning them...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imominous says:
These are public schools? What does religion have to do with a public school?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bartleby19 says:
I'll add a check mark to the imaginary column under "In favor of home schooling" in the debate I have been having in my head. There are many good reasons not to home school, like wanting my children to be properly socialized and to be exposed to the larger world in all of its diversity of ideas outside of just my experience and philosophy. But when I hear about this crap I have to put another vote in the home school column. Or at least I think if the school my kid went to did this the first thing I would do is make the book available to her and make sure she feels free to read it whenever she wants to.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
freechoice4all says:
"Minor said. "...We're looking at it from a curriculum point of view."

My @ss, the complaint was "their content taught principles contrary to the Bible" which is a religious complaint and nothing to do with curriculum.

They should have reviewed the Bible because "Song of Soloman" is very sexually graphic and oriented. It may lead high school students to have pre-marital sex or fornicate!
reply
imominous replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But...but...teaching abstinence has worked so well! Especially in Texas. <snicker>
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rf35 says:
Fortunately, they removed the books from the curriculum. The headline is incorrect; they did not actually ban the book. It is probably still on the library shelf where any student can check it out. In fact, the school board may have intended that more students read the two books they removed. They might just be smart enough to realize that their actions will likely get the students to read the books just to find out what all the hype is about. Of course, they are denied the classroom discussion that might bring about greater understanding of the underlying meanings, but at least they read the thing!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bearfoot33 says:
banning books, any book, is stooopid, PERIOD.
reply
See all 88 Comments