Mom gets probation in son's jaywalking death

Raquel Nelson hugs an attorney after being sentenced to a year of probation July 26, 2011, in a Georgia courtroom. / WGCL-TV
MARIETTA, Ga. - A Georgia woman received a year of probation on Tuesday in the jaywalking death of her 4-year-old son, but the judge also made the unusual move of offering her a chance to clear her name at a new trial. The mother of two surviving children says she's satisfied with the outcome of the hearing.
Raquel Nelson was convicted by a jury this month of vehicular homicide for allowing her son to dart into the busy street north of Atlanta in April. She could have received as many as three years in prison which would have been a much longer sentence than the one for the hit-and-run driver who struck the boy.
The driver, Jerry Guy, was sentenced to six months after pleading guilty to hit-and-run.
Guy has been jailed nine times, mostly on traffic charges, CBS News affiliate WGCL-TV reports. In the late '90s, he was sentenced to two years in prison for two hit-and-run accidents, neither of which were fatal.
Nelson appeared happy as she left the court and thanked those who had helped and supported her.
"I'm walking out of here. I don't feel like I can be more satisfied," she said. "I'm ready to go home."
Judge Kathryn Tanksley gave the 30-year-old woman a sentence that also includes 40 hours of community service, but she made the surprising offer of a new trial. If Nelson is found innocent, her record would be cleared. Her attorney David Savoy said they plan to take the judge up on the offer.
The death happened as Nelson was attempting to cross a busy five-lane street in Cobb County to get to her apartment after getting off a local bus, Savoy said.
The stop is about three-tenths of a mile from the nearest crosswalk, so Nelson and her family routinely crossed the middle of the street. She led her family to a median in the middle of the road and as they waited for traffic to die down, her daughter bolted across the street and her son followed. She chased after them when a van struck.
Some have expressed outrage at the handling of the case. It's rare for someone to be tried and convicted on the homicide charge for crossing the street away from the crosswalk, a pedestrian advocate said.
"It's really cruel and a big waste of taxpayer money," said Sally Flocks, founder of PEDS, an Atlanta pedestrian advocacy group. "What is anybody going to learn from this? Raquel lost her precious son. The lesson she learned already is quit using transit and buy a car to get around. It's too dangerous to cross the streets here."
Popular on CBSNews.com
- No fatalities in I-5 bridge collapse in NW Wash. 132 Comments
- Authorities find cause of Wash. bridge collapse 75 Comments
- Washington state bridge collapses 20 Photos
- Kansas reporters run for tornado shelter during newscast
- Boy Scouts approve plan to accept openly gay boys 613 Comments
- Clean-up efforts underway in Okla. 29 Photos
- Shelton, Underwood coming to aid of Oklahomans
- Kids, teachers from destroyed Okla. school reunite














This whole thing was a waste of taxpayer money, just like the Clemens trial. Society doesn't stand to gain relative to the investment, so don't waste our taxpayer money.
Ticks me off that we have to raise our debt or taxes to pay for court time, lawyers, etc. for this nonsense.
And then I read the comments posted here and sadly understood. It is truly disgusting that so many dismissed the injustice this woman has suffered at the hands of the justice system.
Instead of being angry or outraged that an American mother had to bury her child because of the actions of a drunk driver then defend her life and actual liberty because of the decisions of an over zealous prosecutor..... many of the comments focused on her deserving the punishment, stress, anguish, grief and pain of losing a child because she jaywalked. Not to mention the impact to her livihood for the rest of her life with a vehicular homicide conviction on her record.
Where is the empathy for our fellow human beings? Where is the outrage that a drunk driver a murderer was not charged with vehicular homicide but the person he hit that was not even in a car was?
People who are out at night, I don't know if they realize how hard it is to sometimes see people, even in well-lit areas. Especially if they're wearing dark clothing. Because you're not oftentimes expecting people to be out at night - and jaywalking in the middle of nowhere.
Maybe people who do things like this could add reflective gear to their clothes - there have been times where people took risks jaywalking and I didn't see them, and when I did, this feeling of alarm coursed through me, like wow, what if I hadn't seen them and accidentally hit them.
Nobody wants things like this to ever happen - it's just so sad :(
That's just sad ...
The cross walk is 3/10s of a mile from the bus stop. She had to walk there and then back the same distance to get to her apartment - WITH THREE KIDS IN TOW.
I understand why she tried to take the easy way but she is punished for the rest of her life.
I also want her to pursue the new trial. YOU SHOULD NOT BE CHARGED WITH VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER FOR JAYWALKING.
Does this man not deserve any of the blame for killing an innocent child?
Does the state not add insult to injust by charging her and not the driver with vehiclar homicide?
Something is very wrong in this world when someone hears the details of this case and focus on her jaywalking.
Thou shalt not jaywalk is not in the ten commandments. Thou shalt not kill is.
Yes, that takes more time, but is far, far safer... and responsible.
well, too numerous to correct....until next time...
The same is true in this story - the driver got six months for leaving the scene of an accident, but the person who jaywalked - essentially walked her 4 year old child in front of a moving car - at night, with low visibility.
The driver is responsible for what he did after the accident - he didn't cause this accident.
He got six months for that.
The person responsible for the death of a child - got probation. And yet some of you managed to be outraged.
This story is a lie - I do take public transportation all the time, and I would have convicted her of being guilty - because she is guilty.
Did she take the crosswalk? No. Did she jaywalk? yes. Did it mom and dad just lose a child because of what mom did - absolutely.
Women walk into court, demand full custody, and then get their children killed - it happens all the time in America. It's sickening.
And you want to be outraged about probably, well lets see if you want probation when your ex gets your children killed because of their own negligence.
Holy cow, sounds like communism---she lost a child!!!!
Who hasn't jaywalked at some time or another????
Children dart!!!
Good lord, give this grieving woman a break--she isn't a criminal the justice system in GA is disgusting!!!!
What a bunch of jerks, and the driver will be driving as soon as he gets out ---why doesn't SHE sue the county for not keeping this idiot out from behind the wheel of a car?????