AP/ July 25, 2011, 3:08 AM

Pelosi urges ethics probe into David Wu

PORTLAND, Ore. - House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi Sunday called for an ethics panel investigation of Rep. David Wu following a published allegation that a young woman reported he'd engaged in "aggressive and unwanted sexual behavior."

The Oregon Democrat has been facing calls to resign, but he remained silent Sunday.

In a statement Sunday night, Pelosi asked the "Ethics Committee to initiate an investigation into the allegations against Congressman Wu."

Pelosi had a telephone conversation with Wu Saturday but neither politician disclosed any details.

The Democratic leader says she will send a letter to leaders of the Republican-led House Monday formally asking for the probe.

Wu's spokesman Erik Dorey said he couldn't comment immediately on Pelosi's statement and that Wu may make a statement Monday.

Earlier Sunday, Dorey said he couldn't disclose what Wu did during the day or who he might have consulted.

A Democrat who has challenged Wu in next year's primary, state Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian, said Wu should see Pelosi's calls for an ethics investigation as a signal to step down immediately.

"An ethics investigation would result in a long drawn-out distraction and prolong the public pain" for the unidentified woman who has accused Wu, Avakian said through his spokesman, Jake Weigler. "For the sake of our community and this young woman and her family, as well as his own family, David Wu should do the right thing and step aside now."

Another Wu challenger in the Democratic primary, state Rep. Brat Witt, said an ethics investigation is needed so "we get to the bottom of the allegations and determine what the facts are."

Wu's only response so far has been a brief statement late Friday: "This is very serious, and I have absolutely no desire to bring unwanted publicity, attention or stress to a young woman and her family."

Oregon Democrats have been waiting for word on how Wu plans to respond further to the allegation and the resignation calls.

Spokesmen for both Gov. John Kitzhaber and the statewide party organization said Wu hadn't reached out to top Democrats in Oregon.

"At this point, I don't believe those conversations have happened," said Trent Lutz, executive director of the state party.

Lutz and other party members said they hoped Wu would respond directly to the allegation reported by the Oregonian newspaper. The paper quoted sources who said a young woman left voicemail at Wu's Portland office earlier this year accusing him of an unwanted sexual encounter three weeks after last year's election.

Citing anonymous sources, The Oregonian reported that Wu told senior aides that the sexual encounter with the young woman in California was consensual. The paper reported Facebook notes indicate she graduated from high school in 2010 and that she registered to vote in California last August.

The paper said the woman decided not to press changes because there were no witnesses and it would have been her word against Wu's.

The newspaper said its information came from multiple sources familiar with the allegation.

In Wu's district stretching from downtown Portland to the Pacific Ocean in northwest Oregon, county-level leaders said they, too, were hoping for more from Wu.

"I'm waiting for more details to come out," said Cris Land, party chair in Columbia County.

The heart of the 1st Congressional District is Washington County, a center of high tech and suburban development and the home of David Robinson, a former Navy officer and municipal official who lost by a margin of 4-1 to Wu in the Democratic primary last year. Wu faces primary challengers next year, as well.

Robinson said Sunday he will ask fellow activists in Washington County on Wednesday to approve a vote of no confidence in Wu, calling the woman's allegation "just another in a long line of disappointments and improprieties."

Wu has won seven terms. In 2004, he won despite acknowledging a decades-old college incident in which he tried to force a former girlfriend to have sex. Voters said they disliked an opponent's attempt to use that against Wu.

In January this year, seven staffers resigned because of behavior that included sending a photo of himself in a tiger costume to a staff member and an angry public speech. Wu attributed those to a period of mental health challenges that began in 2008 as marital issues led to separation from his wife.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
23 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bloodhound4 says:
Oregon politics are controlled by a group funded with "foundation" money that floats around from small private foundations like "The Faye and Lucille Stewart Foundation" go to http://www2.guidestar.org/organizations/93-0800814/faye-lucille-stewart-foundation.aspx year 2007 page 30 lists $1,684,955,468 in US GOVERNMENT SECURITIES AS ASSETS. Requires GuideStar free registration to download 990 pdf, use "save link as" save file or click 990 link to view pdf in most browsers.

Housing Discrimination and abuse of the disabled sanctioned by State of Oregon and Rep. Peter DeFazio, with list of documentation.

At August 24, 2010 Coos Bay Oregon townhall meeting DeFazio attacks PTSD victim when her husband asks DeFazio to investigate $1.7 BILLION in US Government securities appearing in "The Faye and Lucille Stewart Foundation" IRS 990 2007 page 30 run by DeFazio friend Faye Hills Stewart II Lane County Commissioner Oregon.

DeFazio rushed towards a person he knew had PTSD waving his arms and yelling, "And this woman thinks her landlord shot at her 14 times, if you can believe that!!!" DeFazio refuses to release the video tape his staff made of the incident. PTSD victim is filing ADA complaint later this week, under federal hate crime statute.

see http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-eugene/housing-discrimination-and-abuse-of-the-disabled-sanctioned-by-state-of-oregon

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8601-250_162-20082778.html?assetTypeId=30&blogId=&tag=contentBody;commentWrapper#ixzz1TPXgrK00

Eventually someone will look into this, possibly CBSnews
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bloodhound4 says:
Housing Discrimination and abuse of the disabled sanctioned by State of Oregon and Rep. Peter DeFazio, with list of documentation.

At August 24, 2010 Coos Bay Oregon townhall meeting DeFazio attacks PTSD victim when her husband asks DeFazio to investigate $1.7 BILLION in US Government securities appearing in "The Faye and Lucille Stewart Foundation" IRS 990 2007 page 30 run by DeFazio friend Faye Hills Stewart II Lane County Commissioner Oregon.

DeFazio rushed towards a person he knew had PTSD waving his arms and yelling, "And this woman thinks her landlord shot at her 14 times, if you can believe that!!!" DeFazio refuses to release the video tape his staff made of the incident. PTSD victim is filing ADA complaint later this week, under federal hate crime statute.

see http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-eugene/housing-discrimination-and-abuse-of-the-disabled-sanctioned-by-state-of-oregon
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54 says:
It may well have been "consensual" and there's no law -- as far as I know -- against middle-aged men having sex with barely legal females. And, sadly, I don't have much difficulty imagining a woman involved in consensual sex with a middle-aged man later claiming his advances were unwanted, for a variety of reasons.

However, I think the majority of voters prefer their representatives to think with their big heads, not their little ones. Something Wu has repeatedly proven himself unable to do.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ksmit2 says:
These are the persons we choose for are leadership, and then
complain that we "can't trust politicians"..This behavior is OK
for a congressman, but condemned when someone from the trailer
park does the same thing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
magnumdr says:
What is it with all of these politicans and younger women. Do these guys think that they have some kind of power with these young women. Make these guys take salt peter so this wont happen again.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
I just do not understand how the folks in Oregon could re-elect this guy when has has such a checkered past. I guess it just doesn't matter to some folks. Just like the folks in New York who re-elected Charles Rangel when he admitted to criminal activity that most common folks would be thrown in jail for.
reply
endurorob_5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They re-elect these guys because all they care about is their ideaology being pushed. The ethics of their chosen politician does not matter to them.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ampsanne says:
Guilty or not, maybe she's just jealous because she wasn't the sexually assaulted one! I wasn't going to say it, but the devil made me do it!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
you_MAY_be_right says:
When will Gloria rear her head in this?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
X2670 July 25, 2011 8:56 AM EDT
Wu...you should have been a Republican. They look the other way and you stay (Vitter, Craig, etc.)
----------------------------------
He probably is a Republican. Did you hear about how the corporate special interest oligarchs put forward a bunch of PHONY democratics in the Wisconsin primaries to obstruct the recall of non-democratic corporate government cronies?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Threewarriors says:
Lets have an ethics investigation of Nancy Pelosi, if for nothing else, being FUGLY.
reply
notyrants replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I've never quite figured out what the right wing non-democratic corporate oligarchs propagandist smear machine hates so much about Nancy Pelosi.
Breeboo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@notyrants - really? *I'VE* never quite figured out why more Democrats aren't embarrassed by her. Let me help you out: for STARTERS, there was her trying to pass the monstrous 2,500 page healthcare bill without even knowing what was in it, then trying to justify her laziness by telling the American People that "we need to pass this bill so we can find out what's in it." I would think that level of condescension and double-speak would be offensive to ALL Americans, regardless of what your political leanings are.
See all 23 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right